90 likes | 197 Views
Academic Principles and Regulations. Periodic Review 2009-10 Quality, Standards, Review and Enhancement. Agenda. Context Overview of Changes Periodic Review Further information and documentation Questions. Overview of Changes. Updating Review of Section B
E N D
Academic Principles and Regulations Periodic Review 2009-10 Quality, Standards, Review and Enhancement
Agenda • Context • Overview of Changes • Periodic Review • Further information and documentation • Questions
Overview of Changes • Updating • Review of Section B • Review of Academic Principles and Regulations for implementation in 2010-11 (to include section B)
Periodic Review • See process flow chart
Periodic Review - changes • Periodic Review must take place within 5 years of approval or last periodic review • Annual Review takes place alongside periodic review • The Chair of the Approval Panel must be drawn from the approved RSO list and training is mandatory for all new Chairs • Student meeting with panel • The Dean/Associate Dean signs off and submits documentation to RSO 8 weeks prior to the event • Feedback from RSO is provided within 2 weeks of receipt and must be reported to Faculty Board or its sub-committees • Post Event definitive documentation must be sent electronically to RSO for audit purposes
Lead Faculty Quality Contacts • FBL: Matthew Froggatt • INN: Justin Thomas • Intl: Ian Richardson • Arts: Nick Waters • FHE: Carol Blackall • CSE: Louise Allen
Documentation • Templates, guidance and regulations to each Faculty Quality Team • http://www.leedsmet.ac.uk/metoffice/aqs/index_Quality_manual.htm • Staff Development