1 / 17

Ohio GRF Tax Revenue FY10-13 Overview

Ohio GRF Tax Revenue FY10-13 Overview. Dr. Howard Fleeter Education Tax Policy Institute OSBA Capital Conference November 16, 2011. GRF Tax Revenues, FY03-FY11. Source: OBM. Effects of the Recession on GRF Tax Revenues.

misu
Download Presentation

Ohio GRF Tax Revenue FY10-13 Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ohio GRF Tax Revenue FY10-13 Overview Dr. Howard Fleeter Education Tax Policy Institute OSBA Capital Conference November 16, 2011

  2. GRF Tax Revenues, FY03-FY11 Source: OBM

  3. Effects of the Recession on GRF Tax Revenues • The previous graph showed that Ohio’s GRF tax revenues fell by nearly $3.2 million from FY08 to FY10 as a result of the recession. • FY10 tax revenues were less than FY03 tax revenues. • GRF tax revenues in FY11 increased by nearly $1.5 billion from FY10, but were still less than the tax revenues of FY04.

  4. Actual and Estimated FY10 GRF Tax Revenues Source: OBM July 2010 Monthly Financial Report

  5. Actual and Estimated FY11 GRF Tax Revenues Source: OBM July 2011 Monthly Financial Report

  6. Actual and Estimated FY10 & FY11 Commercial Activity Tax (CAT) Revenues Source: OBM July 2011 Monthly Financial Report

  7. OBM Estimated FY12 & FY13 GRF Tax Revenues Source: Tim Keen OBM HB 153 Conference Committee Testimony, June 15, 2011

  8. FY12-13 Tax Revenue Estimates • FY12 GRF tax revenues are forecast to increase by $926 million from FY11 levels. • However, FY12 tax revenue estimates are still below FY05 levels. • FY13 GRF tax revenues are forecast to increase by an additional $1.7 billion from FY12 levels. • The FY13 GRF tax revenue estimate of $20.339 billion is higher than any prior year GRF tax revenues.

  9. Actual and Estimated GRF Tax Revenues FY03-FY13 Source: OBM

  10. Estimated Baseline Changes to FY12 & FY13 GRF Tax Revenues Source: FY12-13 Executive Budget - Section B “Economic Forecast” and calculations by Driscoll & Fleeter

  11. Estimated Policy Changes to FY12 & FY13 GRF Tax Revenues Source: FY12-13 Executive Budget - Section B “Economic Forecast” and calculations by Driscoll & Fleeter

  12. Baseline GRF Tax Revenue Changes vs. Policy Change Tax Revenue Changes • In FY12, “baseline” growth in GRF taxes is estimated to comprise only $56 million (6%) of total forecast revenue growth of $926 million from FY11. • GRF tax revenue growth resulting from tax policy changes is responsible for the remaining $870 million in estimated growth. • In FY13, baseline revenue growth is responsible for $1,027 million (60%) of estimated $1.707 billion in growth from FY12. • FY13 baseline GRF tax revenues (not including tax revenues from policy changes) are lower than FY05 GRF tax revenues.

  13. Actual FY03-FY11GRF Tax Revenues & Estimated FY12-FY13 Baseline Taxes Source: OBM, FY12-13 Budget Section B “Economic Forecast” and Calculations by Driscoll & Fleeter

  14. HB 153 K-12 Education Appropriations FY11-FY13 Source: HB 153 Lines 136725 through 136827 for FY12-13, Budget Blue Book for FY11

  15. FY12-13 K-12 Education Funding • While Foundation funding increase from FY11 to FY12 and again in FY13, total state funding for K-12 education falls from $9.35 billion in FY11 to $8.911 billion in FY13. • The reason for the decrease in overall state funding ($679 million over the biennium) is the reduction in TPP and PUTTP replacement payments. • When $914 million of lost SFSF stimulus funding is included, total reductions in general purpose education funding is $1.593 billion over the biennium. • Reductions in other Federal funds, including non-SFSF stimulus, account for an additional $1.225 billion, bringing the total reduction in K1-2 funding over the biennium to $2.818 billion from FY11 levels.

  16. Another View of HB 153 K-12 Education Appropriations Source: Calculations by Driscoll & Fleeter

More Related