200 likes | 371 Views
ANNETTE ENEMARK Director of Tetraplan (DK). You are …. … familiar with the S.U.M.P planning process Stand up . …an experienced S.U.M.P’er Keep standing Otherwise: Sit right back . 38% of citizens encounter problems when traveling within cities.
E N D
ANNETTE ENEMARK Director of Tetraplan (DK)
Youare… …familiar with the S.U.M.P planningprocess Stand up …an experiencedS.U.M.P’er Keepstanding Otherwise: Sit right back
38% of citizens encounter problems when traveling within cities One-thirdof the memberstates feel theiraccessin citiesarebeeinglimited In more thanhalfthe memberstatescongestionis an important urban problem Will mobility conditions change? 24% belive it will improve 37% belive it willbeworse 35% belive it willbe the same Special European Barometer: Attitudes of European towards Urban Mobility, 2013
Who should fix the problems.. 56% City authorities 52% Citizens themselves 28% Regional authorities 27% National Government 3% Private companies Special European Barometer: Attitudes of European towards Urban Mobility, 2013
The story of S.U.M.P. Action Plan on Urban Mobility (2009) White Paper (2011) Urban Mobility Package (2013) Funding options Horizon 2020 INTEREG Civitas Activity Fund ...
SUMP vs. traditional planning Adapted with pride from: Mobility researchers from Aalborg University, The SUMP manual , Can Less sometimes be more? Integrating land use and transport, 2013,
Scenario of 100 families Changes in modal split if... Scenario Based on the Urban Planner Model, VEMA. Formelm.dk Modalsplit 100 single Family Houses
The many devils … Finding the funding The siloes The outreach to internal and external partners The active engagement with the public Time consuming Securing political backing Setting targets and evaluating effects
Interactions in the mobility management sector: new coopera-tions, techniques, solutions, ECOMM 1999.Regional aspects of MM, ECOMM 2000.Responsible mobility - active partnerships, ECOMM 2002.Managing transport demand to attain sustainable development and economic effectiveness, ECOMM 2003.Transition toward a sustainable urban mobility: demonstrate to convince, ECOMM 2004. Delivering attractive options for sustainable travel in different stages of life – current demands shapingthe future of travel, ECOMM 2005.Accessibilityand attractivenessof cities, ECOMM 2006.The futureand MM, ECOMM 2007.TDM - Tackling Climate Change, ECOMM 2008. Cost/benefitand evaluation of MM, ECOMM 2009. Moving people- bridging spaces, ECOMM 2010. EconomicRecession: A new dawn for MM, ECOMM 2011. MM - Key Factor for European development, ECOMM 2012. Smart choices require easy access – the challenge of making MM a part of every day life, ECOMM 2013. Creating the bridge to a green, fairand prosperousmobility future, ECOMM 2014.
GOOD PRACTICE S.U.M.P. Dresden– stakeholderandcitizeninvolvement Vienna– quality-controlled urban mobilitystrategy Copenhagen– visionandgoalsetting Birmingham – integratingenergyandmobilityplanning West of Englandpartnership– institutionalcooperation Gent– consequentsustainable urban mobilityplanning Borrowed - with thanks - from Dr. Susanne Böhler-Baedeker, Rupprecht Consult
Is S.U.M.P. the new black?