1 / 40

JOLANTA BRODZICKA

Doubly charmed B decays. B  D(*)D(*)K. ( for ~140 fb -1 ). November 05, 2003. JOLANTA BRODZICKA. Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow. Plan. b  c c s transition “ wrong-sign” D production physics motivations analysis details

moswen
Download Presentation

JOLANTA BRODZICKA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Doubly charmed B decays B D(*)D(*)K ( for ~140 fb-1 ) November 05, 2003 JOLANTA BRODZICKA Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow

  2. Plan • b  c c stransition “wrong-sign” D production • physics motivations • analysis details • preliminary results ( for ~140 fb-1 ) • Dalitz-plot analysis • summary JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*) D(*) K November 05, 2003

  3. Mechanisms of BD(*)D(*)K decays b  cW - c c s + dd (uu) pair creation ( I ) through external W-emission amplitudes B+ D(*)0 D(*)+ K0 B0 D(*)- D(*)0 K+ ( II ) internal W-emission amplitudes (color-suppressed) B+ D(*)+ D(*)- K+ B0 D(*)0 D(*)0 K0 ( III ) external +internal W-emission amplitudes B+ D(*)0 D(*)0 K+ B0 D(*)- D(*)+ K0 22 decay modes + c.c JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*) D(*) K November 05, 2003

  4. B  D(*)D(*)K : good place to explore spectroscopy: X  DD • cc-bar states above DD threshold scarcely known((3770) (4040) …) • molecular charmonia ( X(3872) ? ) , ccqq states, ccg hybrid states… Y  D(*)K from W-vertex • c s : L= 0 0-Ds(1970) 1-D*s(2112) well known L= 1 jP = 1/2+0+ DsJ± (2317) 1+ DsJ± (2457) seen, do not decay to DK ( chiral doublet toDs± Ds*± ) jP = 3/2+1+ Ds1± (2536) 2+ DsJ± (2573) not seen in B decays ( do chiral partners exist?) • charm deficit B  D(*) D(*) K : significant (~1/2) contribution to b ccs transitions precise BF’s measurements needed • B0 D(*)+ D(*)- K0Sto probe both sin2 and cos2 Physics motivations JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*) D(*) K November 05, 2003

  5. Analysis details • at least 5 good tracks with abs(IP_dz)< 5cm abs(IP_dr)< 0.4cm • R2< 0.3 • K± : P(K/) > 0.4± : P(/K) > 0.1 electron veto: el_id < 0.95 • K0Sabs( M(+ -) - MKs ) < 15 MeV only good_Ks • 0 E > 50 MeV abs( M( ) -M0 ) < 15MeV • D±, D0 and D*±, D*0 reconstruction (N(D)>1 : p(D) < 2. GeVin (4S) system ) • B±, B0 reconstruction : all possible (22 + c.c) physical combinationsD(*)D(*)K B vertex fit: with IP and B lifetime constraints Mbc > 5.2 GeV -0.40 < E < 0.35 GeV JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*) D(*) K November 05, 2003

  6. D(*) plots for ~ 11fb-1 (exp17) D0reconstruction for skimmed sample (with DDK candidate ) BF ~ 28% • vertex fit (refit 0 ) • M (DREC) cut: ± 20MeV • (D0 K0 : - 50MeV) • constraint_mass fit D0 K D0 K3 D0 K0 (doesn`t applied for these plots) D0 KsKK D0 Ks D0 KK JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*) D(*) K November 05, 2003

  7. D(*) plots for ~ 11fb-1 (exp17) D± reconstruction BF ~ 15% • reconstruction procedure • like in D0 case D±Ks D±K D±KsK D±KK D±Ks0 D± JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*) D(*) K November 05, 2003

  8. D(*) plots for ~ 11fb-1 (exp17) D*± reconstruction D*±  D0± BF ~ 68% (D*±  D± 0hopeless ) • vertex fit • (constraints :IP, B) • abs(M(D*)-M(D)-mPDG)< 2.5MeV D0 K D0 K3 D0 K0 D0 KsKK D0 KK D0 Ks JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*) D(*) K November 05, 2003

  9. D(*) plots for ~ 11fb-1 (exp17) D*0 reconstruction • vertex fit • (constraints :IP, B) • refit 0 (vtx_constraint) • abs(M(D*)-M(D)-mPDG)< 5MeV D*0  D00 BF ~ 62% D0 Ks D0 K0 D0 K JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*) D(*) K November 05, 2003

  10. Multi-candidates events treatment • more than 1 candidates in the same B sub-mode • multi D(*) candidates per event • D(*)D(*) combinations with different K`s ~3. B cand per event ( all sub-modes ) D, D* probabilities (LR): S(MD) S(MD), B(MD) parameterization from MD fit LR_D (MD) = + S(MD) B(MD) S(MD*) S(MD*), B(MD*) parameterization from MD*fit LR_D*(MD*) = + S(MD*) B(MD*) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*) D(*) K November 05, 2003

  11. Choice of the best B candidate B probability (LR_B) ( for each B decay sub-mode separately ) LR_B = LR_D(*) × LR_D(*) • best B candidate : with max LR_B • equal LR_B case ( B`s differ only in K ) : • larger K±_ID or better K0S mass candidate chosen S/(S+B) choice method “combines” both criteria: (M-MPDG)/ and S/B ratio LR_B used also for background discrimination ( very efficient ) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*) D(*) K November 05, 2003

  12. (external+internal W-emission) B+ D0D0K+ LR > 0.04 N/7.5MeV N/2MeV Plot for Mbc>5.27 GeV plot for abs(E)<25MeV E Mbc Fully reconstructed signal (from 2dimlikelihood fit) S=94.4 ± 13.0 eff= ( 4.80 ± 0.14 ) *10-4 BF = ( 1 .30 ± 0.18 ± 0.21 ) * 10-3 XNSIG_1 94.4±12.9 XE0_1 -0.32E-02± 0.11E-02 XEW_1 0.59E-02± 0.07E-02 XM0_1 5.2815± 0.28E-03 XMW_1 0.25E-02 ± 0.04E-02 JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  13. (external W-emission) B0 D-D0K+ LR > 0.01 Plot for Mbc>5.27 GeV N/7.5MeV N/2MeV plot for abs(E)<25MeV E Mbc Fully reconstructed signal (from 2dimlikelihood fit) S= 127.6 ± 15.3 eff= ( 5.70 ± 0.14 ) *10-4 BF = ( 1 .75 ± 0.21 ± 0.29 ) * 10-3 XNSIG_1 127.6±15.3 XE0_1 -0.19E-02± 0.09E-02 XEW_1 0.55E-02± 0.07E-02 XM0_1 5.2812± 0.39E-03 XMW_1 0.26E-02 ± 0.03E-02 JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  14. (external W-emission) B0 D*-D0 K+LR > 0.05 Plot for Mbc>5.27GeV Fully reconstructed signal (from 2-dim Mbc vs.E likelihood fit) N/7.5MeV XNSIG_1 86.9 ±10.6 XE0_1 -0.19E-02 ± 0.09E-02 XEW_1 0.69E-02 ± 0.09E-02 XM0_1 5.2807± 0.41E-03 XMW_1 0.30E-02 ± 0.03E-02 E Plot for abs(E)<25MeV N/2MeV eff= ( 2.84 ± 0.07 ) *10-4 BF = ( 2.02 ± 0.25 ± 0.34 ) * 10-3 S = 86.9 ± 10.6 Mbc JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  15. B+ D0D*0K+( right D*K flavor comb.)LR > 0.01 (ext+int) Plot for Mbc>5.265GeV N/7.5MeV Fully reconstructed signal (from 2-dimlikelihood fit) XNSIG_1 49.4±11.6 XE0_1 0.104E-02± 0.43E-02 XEW_1 0.18E-01 ± 0.04E-01 XM0_1 5.2819± 0.98E-03 XMW_1 0.40E-02 ± 0.08E-02 E Plot for abs(E)<45MeV N/2MeV S = 49.4 ± 11.6 Signif.= 7.0 eff= ( 0.64 ± 0.03) *10-4 BF = ( 5 .30 ± 0.93 ± 0.87) * 10-3 Mbc JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  16. B+ D0D*+K0sLR > 0.005 (ext) Plot for Mbc>5.27GeV Fit results for directly reconstr. signal (from 2-dim Mbc vs.E likelihood fit) N/7.5MeV XNSIG_1 40.2±10.1 XE0_1 -0.13E-02± 0.25E-02 XEW_1 0.11E-01± 0.03E-01 XM0_1 5.2808± 0.80E-03 XMW_1 0.28E-02 ± 0.07E-02 E Plot for abs(E)<25MeV N/2MeV S = 40.2 ± 10.1 Signif. = 7.5 eff= ( 1.48 ± 0.06) *10-4 BF = ( 1 .79 ± 0.45 ± 0.25) * 10-3 Mbc JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  17. B0 D*-D*0K+ LR > 0.0 (ext) Plot for Mbc>5.27GeV Fitting results (2dim fit) XNSIG_1 43.4±10.1 XE0_1 -0.34E-02 ± 0.74E-02 XEW_1 0.31E-01 ± 0.07E-02 XM0_1 5.2814± 0.84E-03 XMW_1 0.32E-02 ± 0.07E-02 E Plot for abs(E)<45MeV S = 49.4 ± 11.6 Signif.= 7.1 eff= ( 0.49± 0.03) *10-4 BF = ( 5 .82 ± 1.35 ± 0.96) * 10-3 Mbc JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  18. B0 D*-D*+K0s LR > 0.0 (ext+int) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  19. Dalitz plot for B+ D0D0K+ LR > 0.04 forsignal-box events:abs(E)<25MeV Mbc>5.27GeV Hatched histogram: Mbc sideband events abs(E+0.16)<50MeV Mbc<5.26GeV normalized to backgr. in pion_lost signal box M2 ( D0B D0 ) M2 ( D0K+ ) right M ( D0K+ ) right (3770) N/10MeV M ( D0B K+ ) wrong M ( D0B D0 ) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  20. mass distr. for B+ D0D0K++missing for lostsignal-box events:abs(E+0.16)<50MeV Mbc>5.265GeV LR > 0.1 Hatched histogram: Mbc sideband events abs(E+0.16)<50MeV Mbc<5.26GeV normalized to backgr. in pion_lost signal box M ( D0K+ ) right N/10MeV M ( D0B D0 ) M ( D0B K+ ) wrong JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  21. B+ D0D0K+ (3770) • fitting B signal in DD, DK invariant mass bins inv. massdistributions without background • fitted B yield • PhaseSpace distr. (3-body MC) N / 25MeV M ( D0B D0 ) N / 50MeV N / 50MeV M ( D0K+ ) M ( D0BK+ ) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  22. Dalitz plot for B0 D-D0K+ LR > 0.04 forsignal-box events:abs(E)<25MeV Mbc>5.27GeV Hatched histogram: Mbc sideband events abs(E+0.16)<50MeV Mbc<5.26GeV normalized to backgr. in pion_lost signal box M2 ( D0D-) M2 ( D0K+ ) M ( D0K+ ) N/10MeV M ( D0D- ) M ( D-K+ ) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  23. B0 D-D0K+ DsJ± (2573) ? DsJchiral partner??? N / 50MeV N / 50MeV M ( D0K+ ) SIG_1 15.3±5.6 M0_1 2.577± 0.014 MW_1 0.025± 0.007 SIG_2 32.5 ± 7.1 M0_2 2.717± 0.008 MW_2 0.029± 0.006 M ( D0K+ ) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  24. Dalitz plot for B0 D*-D0 K+ forsignal-box events:abs(E)<25MeV Mbc>5.27GeV LR > 0.005 Hatched histogram: Mbc sideband events abs(E)<80MeV Mbc<5.26GeV normalized to backgr. in signal box M2 ( D0K+) M2 ( D*-D0 ) M ( D0K+ ) also for LR > 0.01 ? N/10MeV M ( D*-K+ ) M ( D*-D0 ) M ( D*-K+ ) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  25. mass distr. for +missing for lostsignal-box events:abs(E+0.16)<50MeV Mbc>5.265GeV B0 D*-D0 K+ LR > 0.05 Ds1 ? Hatched histogram: Mbc sideband events abs(E+0.16)<50MeV Mbc<5.26GeV normalized to backgr. in pion_lost signal box M ( D0K+ ) N/10MeV M ( D*-D0 ) M ( D*-K+ ) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  26. B0 D*-D0K+ N / 50MeV M ( D*-D0 ) N / 50MeV N / 50MeV M ( D*-K+ ) M ( D0K+ ) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  27. Dalitz plot for B+ D0D*+K0s LR > 0.002 forsignal-box events:abs(E)<25MeV Mbc>5.27GeV Hatched histogram: Mbc sideband events abs(E)<80MeV Mbc<5.26GeV normalized to background in signal box M2 ( D*+K0s ) M2 ( D*+D0B ) M ( D*+K0s ) N/10MeV M ( D*+D0B ) M ( D0K0s ) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  28. mass distr. for +missing for lostsignal-box events:abs(E+0.16)<50MeV Mbc>5.265GeV B+ D0D*+K0s LR > 0.05 Hatched histogram: Mbc sideband events abs(E+0.16)<50MeV Mbc<5.26GeV normalized to backgr. in pion_lost signal box Ds1 ? M ( D*+K0s ) N/10MeV M ( D*+D0B ) M ( D0B K0s ) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  29. B+ D0D*+K0s N / 100MeV N / 50MeV M ( D*+K0s ) M ( D*+D0B ) for  signal lost box N / 50MeV N /150MeV M ( D*+K0s ) M ( D0Ks ) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  30. Dalitz plot for B+ D0D*0K+ ( both D*0K flavor comb.) forsignal-box events:abs(E)<45MeV Mbc>5.265 GeV LR > 0.01 Hatched histogram: Mbc sideband events abs(E)<80MeV Mbc<5.26GeV normalized to backgr. in signal box M2 ( D*0K+ ) M2 ( D*0 D0B ) M ( D*0K+ ) right N/10MeV 3.87GeV M ( D*0 D0B ) M ( D0K+ ) right JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  31. mass distr. for B+ D0D*0K++missing for lostsignal-box events:abs(E+0.16)<50MeV Mbc>5.265GeV LR > 0.01 Hatched histogram: Mbc sideband events abs(E+0.16)<50MeV Mbc<5.26GeV normalized to backgr. in pion_lost signal box M ( D*0K+ ) right N/10MeV M ( D*0D0B ) M ( D0K+ ) right JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  32. B+ D0D*0K+ N / 50MeV N / 50MeV M ( D*0 K+ ) M ( D0B D*0 ) for  signal lost box N / 50MeV N / 50MeV M ( D0K+ ) M ( D*0 K+ ) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  33. Dalitz plot for B0 D*-D*0K+ LR > 0.0 for signal box: Mbc>5.27GeV abs(E)<45MeV ~10 events at the threshold at 2.54 GeV come from Ds1± (2536)-> D*0K± ? M2 ( D*0K+) M2 ( D*-D*0 ) M ( D*0K+ ) M ( D*-D*0 ) M ( D*-K+ ) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  34. B0 D*-D*0K+ N / 100MeV N / 50MeV M ( D*-D*0 ) M ( D*0K+ ) N / 50MeV M ( D*-K+ ) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K November 05, 2003

  35. LR_D*± vs. M plots LR_D0 vs. D_mass plots D0 K D0 K3 D0 K0 D0 Ks D0 KK D0 KsKK JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*) D(*) K November 05, 2003

  36. S(MD) LR_D (MD) = + S(MD) B(MD) best B candidate choice method (see my December ICPV talk for more details) S(MD), B(MD) parameterization from MD fit D probability : LR_B = LR_D1× LR_D2 B probability for B± D0D0BK± : • best B candidate : with max LR_B LR_D1vs. LR_D2 plots choice method efficiency(for (kpi)(kpi) ) best = 82 % (estimated from rejected MC events DE, Mbc distributions and correlations between accepted and rejected B candidates ) for B± D0D0BK± (kpi)(kpi) reconstr. eff is 15% efficiency lost due to B_best choice method is 0.9% (kpi)(kpi) (kpi)(no kpi) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  DDK March 12, 2003

  37. LR_B cut (good for bckg reduction and s/b improvement) S / B S / sqrt (S + B ) LR_D1 * LR_D2 cut LR_D1 * LR_D2 cut Signal MC: B±  D0 D0B K± ( for BF = 1.5 * 10-3 ) Background: B±  D0 D0B K± data sideband JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  DDK March 12, 2003

  38. LR_B cut efficiency LR_B cut: good for background reduction and s /b ratio improvement Background reduction (DATA) all Efficiency reduction (signal MC ) LR_D1 * LR_D2 cut LR_D1 * LR_D2 cut Background: B±  D0 D0B K± sideband Signal MC: B±  D0 D0B K± for all D0D0B combinations JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*) D(*) K December 12, 2002

  39. Possibility of Ds1+(2536) detection Generated 20K MC decays: B+ Ds1+(2536) D0B(Ds1)=5MeV Ds1+(2536)  D*0 K+ D0,D0B K LR > 0.01 For directly reconstr. signal: B+ D*0 K+ D0B For partially reconstr. signal: B+ D0 K+ D0B + missing pion N140 M0 2536  7.1 N1420 M0 2393  5.0 N/1MeV N/1MeV M ( D*0K±) M ( D0K±) -143MeV shift JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K October 10, 2003

  40. Possibility of X(3872) detection (if any  ) Generated 20K MC decays: B+ X(3872) K+(X)=5MeV Mmin=M(D*0+D0) X(3872)  D*0D0B D0,D0B K LR > 0.01 For directly reconstr. signal: B+ D*0 D0B K+ For partially reconstr. signal: B+ D0 D0BK+ + missing pion N/1MeV N1100 N3400 N/1MeV M ( D*0D0B) M ( D*0D0B) JOLANTA BRODZICKA B  D(*)D(*)K October 10, 2003

More Related