210 likes | 222 Views
Explore STF360 results and perspectives on dynamic management, user expectations, and proposed enhancements for E2E QoS provisioning using Enhanced SIP. Learn about the user-centric approach, innovative points, and seamless service continuity across networks. Discover how E2E QoS continuity and session binding support a personalized end-to-end service experience based on user profiles and preferences. Dive into the proposed work for enhancing SIP to support personalized service composition, service layer importance, and new opportunities for operators and partners. Understand the goal of achieving end-to-end QoS in a user-centric context with a top-down approach, service composition, and user preferences integration.
E N D
STF 360Mains Results and perspectives 1 TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
User centric E2E session TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
User expectations • Any terminal or any access to use any service in a heterogeneous environment. • Continuous comprehensive service throughout the whole session while moving or changing terminal • During this session, service connectivity is considered as a composition of elements in each layer (User, Terminal, Network and Service). TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
Dynamic Management Conception E2E QoS Provisioning Transfer Management Instrumentation Monitoring Lifecycle of QoS management (Convergence of planes) Innovative points of STF 360 • User centric approach (Personalization: E2E Service Composition, User profile) • E2E QoS continuity according to user’s preference (QoS model). • Dynamic QoS management at every network interface (Home network, Access network, Core network and Service network) Context: One multiservice session considering heterogeneous and mobility environment (User mobility, terminal mobility, service mobility and network mobility) TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
SE52 SE53 SE4 SE3 SE2 SE1 SE51 SE8 Service node QoS SE9 SE10 Service node QoS VPSN Network QoS Network QoS Equipement QoS Equipement QoS E2E QoS Continuity End-to-end User centric Session binding E2E QoS signaling Core Network Core Network Access Network 3 Access Network 2 Access Network 1 Infosphere AmbientGrid Seamless Userware TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
Profils 1 Operator N Subscription 1 Subscribes Belong to 1 has 1 N User Service profile Service • User profile • General • information • Preferences/ • Locations • Activities • Role Network 1 has 1 Terminal Network profile User • Real-time • Profile • QoS model: • Availability • Delay • Fidelity • Capacity Terminal Profile Interaction TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
Proposed WI for enhancement: “Enhanced SIP for personalized composition of services supporting E2E QoS expected from a user centric point of view”
Scope of work to be undertaken • Service layer plays an important role in the end-to-end QoS. • But today, this is not taken into consideration and most of all, the services do not account for it. • The user centric session is the mean to choose the component of services in order to have the overall personalized service, from the terminal level to the service level, through the network level. • Today SIP supports network resource allocation. It seems as well to be a good candidate for resource allocation at service level. • Also, from a user centric point of view, QoS could be enhanced by using service composition, for which SIP could also be useful.. • Moreover, such possibility could be seen as a new opportunity for operators to provide new offers with their partners. • A standardized approach for the composition of services supporting E2E QoS should facilitate the convergence of Telco and IT services. TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
Goal • What : End to End QoS in User Centric Context • Why : Because each level contributes at this QoS • Equipment : Computing delivery (CPU and memory) • Network : Media delivery • Service (components and platform) : Service delivery • How : With top down* approach (through SIP), service composition (SoA) and user preferences *versus IN that are bottom-up (BCP/PoI/PoR) TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
SE2 CA3 CA4 CA1 CA2 Why : E2E QoS (traceability) SE1 SE3 SE1 PoP PoP PoP PoP TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
How : Proposed Platform TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
USE CASE 12 TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
QoS E2E dynamic management (Terminal, Access Network, Core Network, Service Level) + Service Composition (Service Level Using SIP) • Community = Component of service functionally equivalent and QoS equivalent. Community A SE Community B SE Community C SE Community D SE SE7 Community E SE SE12 SE10 SE8 SE8 SE1 SE9 SE11 SE2 SE3 SE12 SE4 SE6 SE5 Service Level Core Network IMS Service composition regarding User Needs = SE4+SE6+SE8 Access Network TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives 13 Service Request
Session Continuity Session regarding User request Session after SE4 deterioration Session after mobility SE10 Community A SE12 SE Community B SE7 SE8 SE SE8 SE1 SE9 SE2 Community C SE3 SE SE11 SE12 Community D SE4 SE6 SE Community E SE5 SE Serviceware Core Network IMS Community Management => Dynamic Provisioning per functional or equivalent QoS = SE2+SE6+SE8 E2E QoS Maintaining Control => Dynamic re provisioning after mobility = SE3+SE6+SE8 Access Network Access Network TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives 14 Service Request
What : The User Centric context • New Approach ≠ Network or Application Centric • A unique session with the services continuity • Personalization through Service Composition • Environment discovery (P2P) • Ambient Networks • Trans-organizational User Mobility Network Mobility Terminal Mobility A Service Mobility A : Temporal Mobility TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
CA1 CA4 CA3 SE2 CA2 The visibility levels User level Users (the demand), commercial (the offer) VO : virtual organization Service level Services providers VPSN (Virtual Private Service Network SE: service element SE1 SE3 SE1 Network level Network operator Access provider CA : Access Switch PoP PoP PoP PoP Equipment level TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
New Vision • Future Internet, Internet of services • Cooperation between heterogeneous networks • Convergence of fix-mobile (Networks) • Convergence of services (Telco, Web, IT) • Convergence of three planes (interfaces) • Autonomous and autonomic management Service network NGN/NGS Middleware Core Network Fixed network Access Network 1 Wireless network Access Network 2 Wired network Access Network 3 Wireless network Seamless Userware TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
Conclusions • The strategic issues • Exposable Services: likely to create value • Value share: Trans-organizational • Fulfill the “User Centric” approach • Architectures Engineering : E2E QoS • ROI and TTM • End to end dynamic and flexible Session TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives
More information • ETSI for STF 360 http://portal.etsi.org/Portal_Common/home.asp • Documents available or soon to be • DTR/USER-00029-3 (TR 102 805-3) • DTR/USER-00029-1 (TR 102 805-1) • DTR/USER-00029-2 (TR 102 805-2) • DTR/USER-00031 (TR 102 806) TR CRESTEL 26/1/2010 - STF360 results and perspectives