1 / 7

Cargo Clearance Authority (CCA) Integrated Process Team (IPT)

Cargo Clearance Authority (CCA) Integrated Process Team (IPT). Purpose. Summarize the results of the Frustrated Freight study at Dover AFB and Distribution Depot Susquehanna, Pennsylvania (DDSP) Obtain DSG concurrence to realign the current CCA IPT. Background.

muhammed
Download Presentation

Cargo Clearance Authority (CCA) Integrated Process Team (IPT)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cargo Clearance Authority (CCA) Integrated Process Team (IPT)

  2. Purpose • Summarize the results of the Frustrated Freight study at Dover AFB and Distribution Depot Susquehanna, Pennsylvania (DDSP) • Obtain DSG concurrence to realign the current CCA IPT

  3. Background • Problem statement: significant amount of cargo entering ports is not cleared for air shipment • Impact: significant frustrated cargo and delayed cargo processing • Assertions and contributing factors • ACA process not in synch with depot requirements to move stock or port hold time standards • Too much low priority cargo in air sustainment system • Widely variant Service challenge criteria • Not all shipments go through FACTS • Don’t have simple, standardized challenge/auto divert rules

  4. Issues • CCP frustrated freight observed ~2% of shipments • Cause is documentation related • Majority (51%) from NIB/NISH* vendors • APOE frustrated freight excluding ‘No Hits’ observed at ~4% • Cause is documentation related • Largest single contributor (45%) hazmat documentation • ~63% were from DoD depots • APOE ‘No-Hit’ frustrated freight observed at ~14% • Multiple causes - not necessarily process or system Issue • Substantial GPC contribution likely • Majority government ‘No-Hits’ (51%) from DDSP (includes CCP) • DLA is the largest shipper (~51%) to APOEs • Only ~10% DLA shipments classified ‘No-Hits’ … less than 16% avg • DLA has lowest percentage of ‘No-Hits’ relative to their shipments than any other DoD shipper * National Institute for the Blind/National Institute for the Severely Handicapped

  5. Recommendation • Disband IPT…assign following as OCRs: • CCP frustrated freight • OSD, BTA and DLA to work with NIB/NISH to resolve • APOE frustrated freight (excluding ‘No Hits’) • DLA to work with DDC and AMC to resolve • APOE ‘No Hit’ frustrated freight • Assign ‘Air Clearance’ process responsibility to TRANSCOM • Coordinate with Service/Agency shareholders • Identify/resolve functional and system issues • OSD Frustrated Freight IPT continue research on impact of GPCs…

  6. Questions?

  7. Backup • DSG Air Clearance IPT • Seeks validation / solutions to root cause of frustrated freight • Seeks improvement to this process • OSD Frustrated Freight IPT • Seeks to identify the root causes • AMC Frustrated Cargo Lean Event(s) • Seeks process improvement of resolving frustrated cargo after-the-fact • GSA Frustrated Freight Study • Seeks to identify the root causes Joined Forces with BTA for Study

More Related