210 likes | 423 Views
A control method of distributed generators in smart distribution system considering system loss and voltage. Pyeongik Hwang School of Electrical Engineering Seoul National University Korea. Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324. Introduction.
E N D
A control method of distributed generators in smart distribution system considering system loss and voltage Pyeongik Hwang School of Electrical Engineering Seoul National University Korea Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
Introduction • Increased installation of distributed generations(DGs) • The characteristics of the distribution system is changed • Voltage profile, system loss, power flow, etc. • Introduction of the smart distribution system • The status of the distribution system can be measured and calculated more accurately • The power output of DGs can be controlled using the communication infrastructures. Chance to more effective operation using DGs Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
DG control problem formulation • The objectives of the proposed method • Minimize the system loss • Maintain the system voltage within its limit - Minimize - Subject to Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
Sequential Linear Programming • Relationship among loss, voltage, and output of DGs is highly non-linear • Formulated DG control problem is a non-linear optimization problem • Sequential Linear Programming(SLP) method is adopted • Optimal solution is calculated by solving series of linear programming (LP) problem linearized at the operation point • Operation point is determined at the previous iteration Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
SLP application to DG control • Sub-functions of SLP • LP formulation • Step size adjustment • Convergence test • Decision variable for LP Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
LP formulation Loss sensitivity matrix • Linearized Optimization problem -Minimize -Subject to Voltage sensitivity matrix Injection power sensitivity matrix Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
LP formulation • Differences between distribution system and transmission system • Existence of mutual impedance in line parameter • Unbalanced connection of DGs • Bus admittance matrix with mutual line impedance • Used for calculation of loss and voltage sensitivity matrices A : bus incidence matrix, [y] : primitive admittance matrix. Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
LP formulation • Differences between distribution system and transmission system • Existence of mutual impedance in line parameter • Unbalanced connection of DGs • Bus admittance matrix with mutual line impedance • Used for calculation of loss and voltage sensitivity matrices A : bus incidence matrix, [y] : primitive admittance matrix. Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
LP formulation • Injection power sensitivity matrix calculation method Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
SLP application to DG control • Step size adjustment • Prevent oscillation in SLP • Convergence test Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
Proposed method • Flow chart of the proposed method Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
Case Study • IEEE 37 node test feeder system with three DGs DG 1 A-B-C phase DG 2 A-B phase DG 3 B-C phase Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
Initial voltage vs. voltage limit • Under voltage violation is occurred in case 2 and case 3 Under Voltage Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
Performance of the proposed method • The proposed method is implemented as a Matlab code • Matlab provided function “linprog” is utilized as the LP solver • Comparing with results of the function “fmincon” • Maximum error is less than 0.1% • Proposed method is at least 90 times faster than fmincon Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
Case 1 ( Vmin = 0.97 p.u., Vmax = 1.03 p.u. ) • The system loss is reduced about 19 %(97kW 78 kW) Operation cost can be reduced by minimizing the loss Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
Case 2 ( Vmin=0.98 p.u., Vmax=1.02 p.u.) • Without proposed method, tap position of OLTC must be changed to eliminate the voltage violation • Increasing operation cost • With proposed method, Under violation is eliminated without tap changing System operation cost can be reduced by preventing the tap changing of OLTC System stability can be improved by maintaining system voltage within its limit Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
Case 2 ( Vmin=0.98 p.u., Vmax=1.02 p.u.) • System voltage Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
Case 3 ( Vmin=0.985 p.u., Vmax=1.015 p.u.) • Tap changing to eliminate the under voltage violation New over voltage violation is occurred Over voltage Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
Case 3 ( Vmin=0.985 p.u., Vmax=1.015 p.u.) • System voltage can be maintained within its limit Power quality can be enhanced by controlling the voltage more tightly Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
Conclusions • DGs control problem was formulated as a non-linear optimization problem. • Sequential Linear Programming (SLP) based DGs control method was proposed • Effects of the proposed method were identified • Operation cost reduction • System stability improvement • Power quality enhancement Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324
Thank You ! (hpi@powerlab.snu.ac.kr) Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324