1 / 27

SENEGAL I.W.R.M. PLANNING PROCESS Tokyo, December 2004

SENEGAL I.W.R.M. PLANNING PROCESS Tokyo, December 2004. CONTENT. Background Organization Achievements First Lessons. BACKGROUND. Geographical Location. SENEGAL. Geographical Location. Background 1/4. Global context: MDGs and WSSD

neal
Download Presentation

SENEGAL I.W.R.M. PLANNING PROCESS Tokyo, December 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SENEGAL I.W.R.M. PLANNING PROCESS Tokyo, December 2004

  2. CONTENT • Background • Organization • Achievements • First Lessons

  3. BACKGROUND

  4. Geographical Location SENEGAL

  5. Geographical Location

  6. Background 1/4 • Global context: MDGs and WSSD • African Context: NEPAD, AMCOW, and various initiatves for Africa: EUWI Canadian,Dutch and German Initiatives

  7. Background 2/4 • West African Context: • Sahel context : water scarcity • WAW Partnership since 2002 • ECOWAS / WRCU • Many shared RB: Senegal, Niger, Gambia

  8. Background 3/4 • Senegal context : • Political will developed for several years • SWP since 2002, with government’s support • Clear options of Water policy: focused on WR development and promotion of Sanitation • Two ministries (Sanitation and Hydraulic ) • Strengthening our willingness of cooperation with other countriesin the framework of OMVS (senegal RBO) and OMVG (Gambia RBO)

  9. Background 4/4 • Senegal context : main water problems • Water Quality: particularly for Groundwater, risks of pollution in Surface Water by agro-industry, • gaps in sanitation • High Running Costs because of obligation to use groundwater from deep aquifers • Maintenance / renewal of Hydraulical Infrastructures: no financial capacity for critical invests

  10. ORGANIZATION IWRM PLan Process

  11. Organization • Process initiated in the framework of Canadian Initiative • Process under control of Government • Important role of SWP

  12. Organization SWP Senegal Water Partnership General Assembly 8 Interest Groups 12 Steering Committee Ex. Sec. T. S. Committee 11 Local SWP

  13. Government - Relevant Ministries Driver : M.A.H. Steering Committee Chair: Min. Agric. Hydraulic DGPRE 66 members – Administrations, Local authorities, NGOs, Professional Organisations, University, Private sector, RBOs, Research institutes, SWP SWP

  14. Government - Relevant Ministries Driver : M.A.H. Steering Committee Chair: Min. Agric. Hydraulic DGPRE Following Committee 3 Min- SWP SWP

  15. Government - Relevant Ministries Driver : M.A.H. Steering Committee Chair: Min. Agric. Hydraulic DGPRE Following Committee 3 Min- SWP SWP Team Project 19 members Coordination Cel 2 RFP 2 RFP 2 RFP 2 RFP 2 RFP 2 RFP

  16. ACHIEVEMENTS

  17. Achievements • MOU signed (Minister & GWPO) • Early, IWRM in relation with MDGs • Close collaboration between Gov. and SWP • Team building workshop (May) : 60 people – identification of Team Members – creation of a ”network” between participants • Work plan Awareness that it is Long term process

  18. Achievements .Team building workshop (May) : 60 people – identification of Team Members – creation of a ”network” between participants • Work plan

  19. Additional studies Additional studies Surveys Surveys 2 WS consultation 5 Regional WS information 5 Regional WS on inventory LFA Meeting WPlan Appoint project staff Team building M O U Adoption process Inventory report Preparation 1st & 2nd version CWP WS Creation of SC & FC Inventory Road Map Training Plan Training Action Comm. Plan Comm. Action Comm. Action 2006 15/01/2004 05/2004 12/2004

  20. Achievements • First Regional Workshops (2/5 realised) • Idenditification and lauchning of 5 studies in relation with MDGs: • Communication plan • Water resources • Uses and needs • Institutionnal framework • Financial matters

  21. NEXT

  22. Next • Prepare all structures to be effective in the Implementation phase (IWRM Plan is not an end itself) • SWP: role to play in: • Training sector • Conflict resolution system between users • Mission of prevention beside national and local authorities • Provide to governmental Institutions advice and opinion about policies

  23. LESSONS

  24. Lessons To involve maximum of people .. And give means for doing that (ex : Wolof language) • Do not forget that the objective is the implementation not the Plan itself (L Term) • To get very early the political will (takes time) • To imply Donors during the planning phase • To be able to reply to the expectation from population, which ”WE” have created • Awareness that it is Long term process

  25. ”Penthio Ndokhmi” for all and Everywhere ARIGATO GOZAIMASS DIUREUDIUF MERCI

More Related