1 / 29

Simulating the dispersion of rotor-wash entrained dust

Simulating the dispersion of rotor-wash entrained dust. J.D. McAlpine Atms 790 seminar April 2, 2007. Collaborators: Dr. D. Koracin Dr. J. Gillies Dr. D. Boyle. Introduction. Forecasting Desert Terrain Project sponsored: Army Research Office

nellie
Download Presentation

Simulating the dispersion of rotor-wash entrained dust

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Simulating the dispersion of rotor-wash entrained dust J.D. McAlpine Atms 790 seminar April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Dr. D. Koracin Dr. J. Gillies Dr. D. Boyle

  2. Introduction • Forecasting Desert Terrain Project sponsored:Army Research Office project coordinator: Dr. Eric McDonald • Our Aspect: - Exploring the flow field around a helicopter in ground effect - What aspects of the flow field contribute the most to dust emission? - Developing a method to simulate dust entrainment due to the helicopter flow field - Coupled modeling of various scales mesoscale  microscale

  3. Developing a modeling method: outline • Why is helicopter dust emission a significant concern? • Modeling plan outline: - Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)- rotor wake simulation - Dust entrainment simulation - Particle modeling simulation • Upcoming Desert Terrain Rotorcraft Experiment - Measurement of helicopter flow features and dust dispersion

  4. Why is dust entrainment a concern? Regulation: • PM emission inventories • Clean air act: U.S. base operations • Regional Haze Rule Operation: • Training simulation • Visibility • Equipment damage

  5. Unknowns: flow field and dust source • Rotor jet • distribution and • impingement • Turbulent burst • 3. Surface jet • Vortex shedding • Re-entrainment • of dust

  6. Modeling Scheme Elements

  7. Proposed Modeling Scheme • Computational Fluid Dynamics (FLUENT) • Virtual Blade Model (VBM): • DRI Lagrangian Particle Model • Dust source term Post-processor: Filterer Shear stress CAD Model CFD & VBM DRI LPM Atmospheric simulation scheme Dust source term

  8. Fluent CFD simulations: • Equations of motion solved over a discretized domain: • Continuity equation • Conservations of momentum • Energy equation • Equation of state • Turbulence parameterization scheme (K-eps, LES…) initialization iteration solution

  9. Virtual Blade Model vs. Full blade modeling VBM: momentum source • only time-averaged flow field needed • effects of flow on individual blades irrelevant • VBM: sophisticated technique- heli. specific

  10. Virtual Blade Model: Blade Physics Blade Element Theory: Force= lift(L) – drag(D): • Lift & drag coefficients (CL and CD): f(angle) • U: function of blade orientation

  11. Virtual Blade Model: in action • Model accounts for: trimming, twist, chord var., flapping, coning • Source evolves with solution: numerically stable • Example: static pressure of validation case: Untrimmed Trimmed

  12. Atmospheric simulation • 1st case: steady state neutral atmosphere • Desert Measurement Project Comparisons: -steady state profiles - unsteady real-time • Final Product: - Coupled mesoscale-LES boundary layer model

  13. Atmospheric simulation: 1st case - Neutral atmosphere, k-epsilon turbulence model • 1st: validate: • - TKE profile • - epsilon profile • - wind profile • 2nd: rotor simulation • Blackhawk heli. • 3rd: LPM input • Adapt CFD results • -Ensure same atmos. • conditions INPUTS: -surface roughness -wind profile: -TKE profile and source term: -epsilon profile:

  14. Results: in progress • 1st case: • Light winds • -Blackhawk dimensions • Current work: • -Simplified Blackhawk • Geometry • -Proper rotor variables • -Validation of pressure • Distribution • TKE, wind dist. validation

  15. Dust Source Term • Physics of particle entrainment: Shear Stress: Aerodynamic Lift: -determined from shear stress, velocity -overcome sliding friction 1st -overcome gravity next

  16. Dust Source Term • “Lifting potential” of a shearing flow at the surface: • Factors: vegetation, surface consistency, supply, saltation

  17. Dust Source Term Helicopter case: more sophisticated method needed? Why? • Highly turbulent: varying friction velocity • Significant local pressure gradients • Significant vertical velocities • Rapid saltation, source depletion

  18. Lagrangian Particle Model Many Particles: Statistical Dispersion Modeling Drift term Stochastic term Gaussian Random Acceleration

  19. Lagrangian Particle Model

  20. Review of modeling scheme Post-processor: Filterer Shear stress 1.CFD & VBM 4. LPM 3. Dust Source Term 2.Atmospheric simulation scheme Comparison to Measurement Study: #1: Correct Helicopter config. #1: Correct surface variables #2: Correct profiles #2: Real time simulation? #3: Shear stresses vs. mass #4: Downwind dispersion conc compared to measurements

  21. Desert Rotor Entrainment Study • Military Helicopter in ground • effect over desert terrain • Optical Remote Sensing- • PM concentrations: • -LIDAR • -FTIR • Irwin sensors • -Shear Stress • Sonic Anemometer • -Heli. flow and TKE • Standard meteorological • measurements for background In planning: Summer 2007

  22. PM concentrations: • Optical Remote Sensing method: • FTIRs • (OP-LTs) • MPL

  23. PM concentrations

  24. Shear Stresses Helicopter Flight over Irwin sensors

  25. Modeling validation

  26. Model Validation • Significant variations? - source decay handling? - instrument error? - simulation errors? - atmospheric setup - shear stress calculation - landing/take-off cycle • More sophisticated model runs - non steady state vs. steady state solution?

  27. Conclusion: Scientific Value of this Project: - Better understanding of perturbation dynamics through experimental observations and modeling - Better understanding of the perturbation dynamics relationship to dust entrainment - Computer Modeling: Simulation of the dust source and dispersion - Coupling of models of various scales: Mesoscale  CFD  LPM

  28. Future work • Reassessment of the LPM turbulence schemes • Improvement of the LPM algorithm • Validation of improved model • Coupled WRF-LES microscale model for atmospheric input • Other sources: artillery, fixed-wing, tracked vehicles, wheeled vehicles

  29. Questions? • Thank you to: • Army Research Office • Sierra Pacific

More Related