1 / 11

ATRAS: WP3 Survey of barriers to acceptance of ATs

ATRAS: WP3 Survey of barriers to acceptance of ATs. Jane Burridge, Caroline Ellis-Hill, Ann-Marie Hughes, Sara Demain and Lucy Yardley. WP 3 - Objectives. To explore: Participants’ perceptions of how AT addresses their needs Participants’ perceptions of the barriers to using ATs

neviah
Download Presentation

ATRAS: WP3 Survey of barriers to acceptance of ATs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ATRAS: WP3Survey of barriers to acceptance of ATs Jane Burridge, Caroline Ellis-Hill, Ann-Marie Hughes, Sara Demain and Lucy Yardley

  2. WP 3 - Objectives To explore: • Participants’ perceptions of how AT addresses their needs • Participants’ perceptions of the barriers to using ATs • Positive and negative aspects of including ATs within a clinical service

  3. Overview WP3 • Interactive Exhibition • Focus groups • Questionnaire • Field studies

  4. Progress to date • WP3 monthly team meetings • Protocol design for focus groups • Interactive Exhibition - design and preparation • Ethics and research governance submissions for the focus groups

  5. Ethics and Governance • IRAS application • Cover letter, Invitation letters (*2), reply slips, PIS, consent forms, IRGA forms, risk assessment, rejection letters, protocols, focus group schedules *6) IRAS form and insurance forms • Ethics committee meeting Fri 18th Sept – no concerns raised • University Southampton (insurance) • Salisbury NHS trust (sponsor)

  6. Exhibition companies • Commercial companies identified • Expression of interest designed, sent out and responses processed • Exhibitors prospectus designed, sent out and responses processed • Bioness, Ectron, Hocoma, Odstock medical limited, Ottobock, Peacocks, Saebo • Logistics – identification of venue, parking, catering • Photos and text re: products obtained

  7. Exhibition attendees • Publicity • Day 1- Health care professionals: NHS trusts, ACPIN, WP2, private rehabilitation providers, colleagues in ATRAS work packages • Days 2&3 - Patients and carers: radio, press, voluntary sector, private rehabilitation providers, participant data bases, colleagues in ATRAS work packages • Admin support – Jo (phone calls) and Rachel (emails) • Story Boards – images, typical usage, pros and cons • Patient and therapist interaction with technologies (days 2 & 3) • Delegate responses • Organisation of days

  8. Exhibition Outputs • Memory jogger sheets – inform focus group discussion schedules • List of potential participants for focus groups • Report to inform WP 4 • Dissemination

  9. Focus Groups • Participants • People attending the exhibition (WP1 workshop, ACPIN personal contact if required) • Purposive sampling to ensure representation • Six Focus Groups • Patients who have used UL ATs • Patients who have NOT used UL ATs • Carers of people with stroke • Multi-disciplinary healthcare professionals (stroke rehab) • Service Managers and budgets holders in stroke rehabilitation • People responsible for commissioning stroke services (?interviewed separately)

  10. Focus Groups - Timetable • Focus groups - November / December 2009 • Data Analysis – January to April 2010 • Questionnaire designed and validated by May 2010 • All ahead of schedule (Gantt chart)

  11. WP3 Gantt chart Focus groups Nov / Dec 09 Analysis beginning Jan 10

More Related