210 likes | 527 Views
ASTYM and Graston Applications. Dustin Lind Tasi Kelemete Keelan McCaffrey. Intro to Graston & ASTYM. Form of tissue massage Instruments used to achieve Relaxation of muscle Increased Range of Motion (ROM) Decreased pain during activity Combined with other therapy. Our stance.
E N D
ASTYM and Graston Applications Dustin Lind Tasi Kelemete Keelan McCaffrey
Intro to Graston & ASTYM Form of tissue massage Instruments used to achieve Relaxation of muscle Increased Range of Motion (ROM) Decreased pain during activity Combined with other therapy
Our stance Both methods are approved for all ages Graston is not appropriate for: Young populations (Pain tolerance) Sedentary populations (No research) The elderly (Easy bruising)
Graston Technique What is it? • Six Stainless Steel Instruments • Weekend course completion • M1 Basic- 12 hours $550 • M2 Advanced- 14 hours $695
Graston Technique • Who Uses It? • 16,775 clinicians (Graston, 2013). • Physical Therapist • Athletic Trainers • Occupational Therapist
Issues with Graston • Bruising of the area • Pain tolerance
Personal Interview • Course not hard, hands on • All ages are acceptable • Scar tissue, lasting, post surgery • Couple times a week • Depends on person’s pain tolerance
ASTYM Technique • Soft tissue therapy • Benefits • Quick and effective • Non-invasive • Reduced therapy sessions (ASTYM, 2012)
ASTYM Technique • Who can be certified? • Three day certification course • Upper extremity 15.75 hours • Lower extremity 8 hours (ASTYM, 2012)
ASTYM Technique Cont. • Video example • Personal experience
Issues Related to ASTYM • Harsh form of therapy • Other forms of therapy without pain
Applications of ASTYM and Graston When is Graston appropriate to use? • Approved for all ages (Graston, 2013) • Professionals don’t use on children (Wotowey, 2013) • Research limited to athletic populations • Positive results in research studies (Looney, B., Srokose, T., Penas, C., & Cleland, J. 2010)
Graston Use Cont. • Very good results with athletes (Wotowey, 2013) • Better results with active patients (Looney, B., Srokose, T., Penas, C., & Cleland, J. 2010)
Conclusion • Graston/ASTYM are useful techniques • ASTYM suitable for widespread use • Virtually all populations can benefit (Humphrey, 2013) • Graston is not suitable for: • Infants, children, elderly, sedentary populations
Conclusion Cont. • Graston needs more research on: • Infants, children, elderly, and sedentary populations • Graston use should be with: • Athletic/active populations
References McCormack, J. R. (2012). The Management of Mid-portion Achilles Tendinopathy with ASTYM and Eccentric Exercise. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 7(6), pp. 672-677. Papa, J. A. (2012). Two cases of work-related lateral epicondylopathy treated with Graston Technique and conservative rehabilitation. Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association,56(3),192-200. Schaefer, J. L., & Sandrey, M. A. (2012). Effects of a 4-week Dynamic-balance-training program supplemented with Graston instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization for chronic ankle Instability. Journal of Sport Rehabilation, 21(4), 313-326.
References Silbugh, K. (2009). The validity of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization for detecting myofascial adhesions through secondary diagnostic ultrasound analysis. Applied Medicine and Rehabilitation. 5(4), pp. 124-128. Stow, R. (2011). Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization. International Journal of Athletic Therapy &Training, 16(3), 5-8.