1 / 6

Securing ARC Grants: Insights and Strategies by Prof. Greg Ivey

Gain valuable insights on winning ARC grants from Prof. Greg Ivey, sharing a personal perspective and analysis based on his 20-year experience (1988-2008). Explore key factors affecting grant success, from track record to proposal readership. Learn practical tips on crafting engaging proposals, forming partnerships, and more. Join this panel to enhance your grant application skills and increase your chances of success.

nicholasf
Download Presentation

Securing ARC Grants: Insights and Strategies by Prof. Greg Ivey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. How to win friends and influence people (in the ARC process) Panel 1: Water and Resources Professor Greg Ivey, School of Environmental Systems Engineering, UWA

  2. ARC Grants - a personal perspective and analysis • In 20 year period 1988-2008, wrote 21 ARC proposals as either sole or co-CI. Mainly DP, but also LP(2), RIEFF(1) and LIEFF(1). • Of total, 2 DP proposals were not funded. Why? • Initial appointment in 1988 was as Lecturer. First 10 proposals were successful.

  3. Main factors influencing these results • Track record prior to first grant application • Proposal readership (the friends to “influence”) : reviewers will typically be mid or late career in closely-related fields; panel typically late career and probably not closely-related fields. Either group is busy with diverse strengths. • Good idea takes time - planning process (eg timeline for drafts - 2 week deadline) • proposal should be: very succinct, even simple (never “fill” 10 pages; interesting and engaging for reader; have an argumentative edge, be persuasive.

  4. Main factors (contd) • First couple of pages of E2 is crucial - “the hook”. • Remainder is the “reeling in”. • Get review by others (eg 2 week timeline in SESE). • Partnerships - ECR ?. • In summary: “hook, then reel in”. Happy fishing!

  5. Example - opening

  6. Example - closing (E2)

More Related