1 / 16

Design of a Head Mounted Display for Image-Guided Surgery

Design of a Head Mounted Display for Image-Guided Surgery. Bo Bai Stephanie Dalquist Megan Galbraith 16 May 2002. Introduction. Develop HMD for surgeons Projects diagnostic images on patient Compare digital X-Rays, NMR Overlay text plans High resolution and accuracy

nili
Download Presentation

Design of a Head Mounted Display for Image-Guided Surgery

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Design of a Head Mounted Display for Image-Guided Surgery Bo Bai Stephanie Dalquist Megan Galbraith 16 May 2002

  2. Introduction • Develop HMD for surgeons • Projects diagnostic images on patient • Compare digital X-Rays, NMR • Overlay text plans • High resolution and accuracy • Design micro-display for image source

  3. Technology goals • Full color, 4 bits/color grey scale • Minimum frame rate of 100 Hz • High resolution – 1280 x 1024 • Pixel pitch at most 24 μm • High contrast ratio, at least 100:1 • Design for hospital environment, 100 Cd•m-2 • Minimum brightness 60,000 Cd•m-2

  4. Display technology • Active Matrix Organic LED • Fast response time of 3 μs • Pixel pitch down to around 12 μm • Can reach brightness levels up to 106 Cd•m-2 • Reliable to 106 hours • Preferred over other technologies • AMEPD: color difficulties • AMLCD: less bright • AMELD: not very bright (23 Cd/m2 at 60 V)

  5. Grey scale method • Sub-framing • Allows for 16 shades from black to white • Minimizes flicker at high ν (1600 Hz) • Other options • Patterning: Too much flicker, too few greys • Voltage modulation: • Requires high sensitivity to ΔV • More complicated drivers

  6. Pixel structure • Stacked OLED • True color • High contrast • Bright, emissive • Flexible • Makes pitch spec

  7. Pixel structure • Stacked OLED preferred • Other options: • Side-by-side monochrome • Large pitch or lower resolution • Many have decreased viewing angles • Color filters • Absorption loss • Need efficient blue dyes

  8. Pixel circuit • Diode equivalent for each color • Single line addressing • Voltage across rows • Data down columns • High frequency • Simpler, cheaper drivers

  9. OLED requirements • 9V to reach 60,000 Cd•m-2 • Current Density of 50 mA/cm2 • Area = Apixel - Atransistors = 570 μm2 • Current =2.87 x 10-4 mA

  10. CMOS specification • Choose n-doped CMOS: Kn > Kp • Lowers power consumption • VGS = 0.6V • ID = 0.5Kn(VGS-VTn)2 • VG1 = VGS+Vdiode = 0.6+9 = 9.6V • VG2 = VG1+VTn = 9.6+0.5 = 10.1V • Column voltage = VG1 = 9.6V • Row voltage = VG2 = 10.1V

  11. Driver specifications • Generic driver circuit • Can be used with OLED, ELD, LCD, etc. • Row driver draws 10.1 V • Column draws 9.6 V

  12. I/O data rate for drivers • Row data rate • Selects a row to update • Consider 16 sub-frames for grey scaling • 1.6 MHz or 205 Kbps • Column data rate • Sends color information • 6.29 GHz or 786 Mbps • Much more data, much faster data rate needed

  13. Power consumption • Total power consumption of 4 W • 2 x 10-6 W per pixel • Ppixel = VI = 9V x 2.87x10-4 mA • Display requires 4 W • Ptotal = PpixelNrowsNcolumns • Conservative estimate assuming all pixels on

  14. Overall efficiency • Display efficiency ηdisplay= 27% • 4 lumens/Watt power efficiency at 9 V • Input Power Pin = 4 W • Output Power Pout = 60,000 Cd/m2 • Area/(4 lm/W • 4π Cd/lm) = 0.9 W • ηdipslay = Pout/Pin • Optical subsystem ηoptics = 15% • Overall ηdisplay •ηoptics= 4%

  15. Conclusions • Meet target specifications at low cost with current technology • Not power hungry • Safe (low voltage, amperage, etc.) • Take it to the lab for prototyping • Revolutionize health-care by 2010

  16. questions?

More Related