210 likes | 414 Views
Yu Wang, C. K. Shum , Yuchan Yi, Ohio State Univ. Koji Matsumoto, National Astronomical Obs., Japan Yoshihiro Niwa, University of Tokyo Yi Chao, Xiaochun Wang, NASA/JPL Venice, 13–18 March 2006. Coastal Tide Modeling Using Multiple Satellite Altimetry.
E N D
Yu Wang, C. K. Shum, Yuchan Yi, Ohio State Univ.Koji Matsumoto, National Astronomical Obs., JapanYoshihiro Niwa, University of Tokyo Yi Chao, Xiaochun Wang, NASA/JPLVenice, 13–18 March 2006 Coastal Tide Modeling Using Multiple Satellite Altimetry
Coastal Tide Modeling Using Multiple Satellite Altimetry • • Tides are still largely unknown in coastal and polar regions • Approach: empirical solutions using multiple satellite altimetry (T/P, JASON, GFO, ENVISAT) to improve spatial resolution and reduce tidal aliasing (not shown), followed by assimilated (hydrodynamic) tide modeling • T/P cycles 4-364, 369-479; JASON cycles 1-135; GFO, cycles 37-140; ENVISAT cycles 10-38 • Preliminary solutions & evaluations in the Yellow Sea and NW Pacific regions (comparing with JPL ROM derived tides)
TOPEX tracks (black line) and multiple satellite data points (T/P, JASON, ENVISAT, GFO; red) at Yellow Sea (top) and NW Pacific regions (right)
Empirical Tide Modeling in Yellow Sea • Performance of recent global models 8 major constituent RSS differences (left: FES04 & GOT; middle: TPXO06 & GOT00; right: TPXO06 & FES04)
Empirical tide modeling in the Northwest Pacific The amplitude of 4 major tides using T/P crossovers
Empirical tide modeling in the Northwest Pacific The amplitude of 4 major tides usiing ERS-2 crossovers
Empirical tide modeling in the Northwest Pacific The amplitude of 4 major tides using ERS-2 and TOPEX dual-satellite crossovers
Empirical Tide Modeling in the Yellow Sea M2 K1 1/40x1/40
Assimilated (Preliminary) Tide Modeling in Yellow Sea M2 K1 Multiple altimetry data used, no tide gauge data used
M2 vector differences (L: FES2004, M: GOT00.2, R: TPXO.6.2) K1 vector differences (L: FES2004, M: GOT00.2, R: TPXO.6.2)
Empirical Tide Modeling in the Yellow Sea • Comparison with coastal tide gauges M2 K1
Empirical Tide Modeling in the Yellow Sea • Tide gauge evaluations (vector RMS difference, cm) Edit criteria = 50 cm Edit criteria = 25 cm Only 1 tide gauge used (37.5N, 122.167E)
Northwest Pacific: M2 Empirical Solution ROMS (X. Wang & Y. Chao)
Northwest Pacific: K1 Empirical Solution ROMS (X. Wang & Y. Chao)
Comparison of Empirical Solution with ROMS Model • RMS summary for 8 major tides (cm)
CONCLUSION • Altimetry data from 4 satellites are used in the empirical tide modeling, which gives a better spatial resolution than using TOPEX data only. • The empirical solution for the Yellow Sea area using multiple satellite altimetry data is comparable with most recent global models, with the best consistency with GOT00 model • Tide gauge evaluations of the Yellow Sea empirical and the assimilated solutions and other models are inconclusive because of lack of tide gauges • Multi-satellite empirical tide solution compares well with tide solution from the fine-resolution JPL ROMS in the NW Pacific