1 / 17

Mark Taylor Manager SLIP Emergency Management Program FESA April 2007

E mergency M anagement Status April 2007. Mark Taylor Manager SLIP Emergency Management Program FESA April 2007. Establishing an Emergency Management Spatial Capability for WA “Same Information at the Same Time”. Agency Incident Management System i.e. WebEOC.

noble-kidd
Download Presentation

Mark Taylor Manager SLIP Emergency Management Program FESA April 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Emergency Management Status April 2007 Mark Taylor Manager SLIP Emergency Management Program FESA April 2007

  2. Establishing an Emergency Management Spatial Capability for WA“Same Information at the Same Time” Agency Incident Management System i.e. WebEOC Agency Incident Management System i.e. WebEOC Public Notification i.e. APECS SLIP-EM Mapping Agency Computer Aided Dispatch SLIP Enabling Framework Agency GIS

  3. Achievements • Governance under SEMC • Detailed user requirements • Data requirements, • Data capture and sharing protocols • Common operating picture(s) • Pilot system trialed for 3 of (23) State Hazards • Bushfire (FESA, DEC and Local Government) • HAZMAT (FESA) • Land Search and Rescue (WA Police) • CT and CIP coordinated national development • Emergency Services Directory

  4. Achievements • Governance under SEMC • Detailed user requirements • Data requirements, • Data capture and sharing protocols • Common operating picture(s) • Pilot system trialed for 3 of (23) State Hazards • Bushfire (FESA, DEC and Local Government) • HAZMAT (FESA) • Land Search and Rescue (WA Police) • CT and CIP coordinated national development • Emergency Services Directory

  5. Achievements • Governance under SEMC • Detailed user requirements • Data requirements, • Data capture and sharing protocols • Common operating picture(s) • Pilot system trialed for 3 of (23) State Hazards • Bushfire (FESA, DEC and Local Government) • HAZMAT (FESA) • Land Search and Rescue (WA Police) • CT and CIP coordinated national development • Emergency Services Directory

  6. Common Operating Picture a) Consistent Symbology

  7. Common Operating Picture a) Consistent Symbology b) Customised views/products for specific hazards & roles

  8. Data (via SLIP) a) Consistent terminology b) Authoritative Source c) Consistent Currency d) Fit for purpose / best available

  9. Integration/Seamless interoperability a) Modelling software (plume, fire spread, weather forecast, etc) b) ICS (Incident Management System, Public Alert Communication)

  10. BEST-Care Site Plan Integration/Seamless interoperability a) Modelling software (plume, fire spread, weather forecast, etc) b) ICS (Incident Management System, Public Alert Communication) c) Spatially linking operational documentation

  11. Common Toolsets a) Consistency b) Simplicity

  12. Processes Near-real time incident data sharing (aerial surveillance, field surveys, agency based GIS services, etc)

  13. Processes Near-real time incident data sharing (aerial surveillance, field surveys, agency based GIS services, etc) Alignment with AIMS (authorisation, authentication, auditing)

  14. Operational staff, management media, support agencies, stakeholders can view the information via a standard web browser using the role based login viewing information that is pertinent, customised and authorised for release

  15. Success Reliant on Availability of Information Hazardous Risks Special Risk and Dangerous Good Sites Risk Mitigation Plans Environmental Risks Flora, Fauna, Water Catchments, Contaminated Sites Social Risks Schools, Day and Aged Care, Sporting, Retail and Cultural Centres Base Mapping Imagery, Street Directory, ESD’s Contours Operational Mapping Hospital, Hydrants, Community and Welfare Centres, Airfields, EM Offices Infrastructure Power, Gas, Water “Benefit from Real Time Sharing of Information” • Incident Data • Fire Shapes, Chemical/Smoke Plumes, Road Blocks, Containment Zones • Environmental Data • Weather Forecasts, Lightning Strikes, River Monitoring

  16. Current Status • Funding Submission unsuccessful (incl. ESD) • Existing funds to maintain service 2007/08 • Existing three scenarios with limited deployment • Develop 3rd ESD over South Coast • Expectation for Operational Use • Need to ensure long term reliability and extension • Requires formal training programs and exercise regime • Support and resourcing to build into operations • Issues • Staff secondments (WALIS, DoIR and DOW) • Long term sustainability of ESD

  17. Current Status • Operational strength for SLIP-EM services • Operational Deployment of SLIP-EM • Field operations • Coordination (response and recovery) • Briefing/Debriefing (operations and exercises) • Cross agency coordinated sharing (operational protocol) • Establishment of Formal Training Programs and Testing • Data Improvement programs (i.e. ESD) • Establishment of SLIP Data Access Agreements and Data Improvements • SLIP-EM • Agencies systems (CAD/GIS/IMS) • Linkage to Agency Incident Management Systems • Remote Data Access (offline and partial online)

More Related