280 likes | 375 Views
Joe Sharkey Structural Option Christiana Hospital 2010 Project Newark, DE. Introduction Structural Overview Proposed Changes Effects of Sectioning Structure on the Lateral System Post-Tensioned Slab Design Cost/Schedule Comparison Acoustical Design Conclusions. Scope of Presentation.
E N D
Joe SharkeyStructural OptionChristiana Hospital2010 ProjectNewark, DE
Introduction Structural Overview Proposed Changes Effects of Sectioning Structure on the Lateral System Post-Tensioned Slab Design Cost/Schedule Comparison Acoustical Design Conclusions Scope of Presentation
Introduction • Occupant – Christiana Care • Project Cost - $126 Million • 360,000 ft2 addition • Design-Bid-Build • 8 Story Hospital • 2 Story Conference Wing Creates additional: • 216 Beds • Operating Rooms • Catheterization Labs • Emergency Exam Rooms
Structural Overview Hospital (Main Tower) • 42” thick mat foundation • 9 ½” two-way reinforced concrete slab • 5 ½” drop panels around columns • 24”x24” concrete columns • (11) 12” thick concrete shear walls
Structural Overview Conference Wing • Spread Footings • Steel Framing • 3 ¼” lightweight concrete over 2” metal deck • 4 concentrically braced frames • Large 63’ span at the center
Proposed Changes • Divide Main Tower into two independent structures • Create a more symmetrical building • Reduce lateral load due to torsional effects on shear walls • Reduce size/number of shear walls for cost/schedule savings • Create a post-tensioned design • Deletion of drop panels • Save on formwork/labor • Compare cost and schedule
Effects of Sectioning Structure CM2 CM1 CR2 CR1
Effects of Sectioning Structure ASCE7-02 (9.5.2.8 & 9.5.5.7.1)Seismic Use Group: IIII=1.5 Cd=4.5∆amplified=(Cd*∆)/I ∆allowable=0.01h=0.01(118’)=14.16” A C
Post-Tensioned Slab Design Main Tower (First Floor) • Class U (uncracked concrete): ft < 7.5√f’c • 10” Slab • 5000 psi concrete • Largest Span = 30’ • Tendons in groups of 4 @ 6’ o.c. Exterior Span Interior Span 1¼” 1¼” 10” 5” 1¼” 1¼”
Uniformly Spaced Tendons Main Tower (First Floor) ½”Ф – 270 ksi unbonded tendons in groups of 4 @ 6’ o.c. Stressing Pockets Expansion Joint
Banded Tendons Main Tower (First Floor) Banded Tendons # Tendons 22 20 18 16 14 12 8 In-Plane Curve > 6:1
Sustained Service Load Deflection Plan ∆max = L/360 = 1”
Uniformly Spaced Tendons Main Tower (Typical Floors) ½”Ф – 270 ksi unbonded tendons in groups of 3 @ 3¾’ o.c. Expansion Joint
Banded Tendons Main Tower (Typical Floors)
Conference Wing (Typical Floor) Prestressed Beam 24x42 w/ 30 Tendons RC Beam 24x42 8#6 T&B 15” Slab Slab Tendons in groups of 3 @ 4 ½’ o.c. RC Beam 16x42 4#7 T&B Prestressed Beam 18x42 w/ 15 Tendons
Acoustics 12’ Ceiling Height Materials Used: 63’ • 5/8” Gypsum 61’ • 4’x4’ Armstrong Optima Ceiling Tiles • Softwall ½” Acousticotton • Carpeting • Upholstered Seats
Acoustics • Benefits: • Target Reverberation Time Met • Cost Savings of $12,591
Conclusions Sectioning Structure into two Independent Structures: • Increased Forces • Required Additional Walls • Increased Both Cost and Schedule Post-Tensioned Design: • Created a Lighter Building • Allowed for Deletion of Drop Panels • Decreased Both Cost and Schedule in Main Tower • Increased Schedule in Conference Wing Acoustical Redesign: • Target Reverberation Time Met • Decreased Cost of Conference Room by $12,591
Acknowledgments • Cagley & Associates • Suncoast Post-Tension • Acoustical Panel Resources • Armstrong • Frank Malits • Joe Ajello • James Lakey • Wilmot Sanz • Sheila Williams • Marjam Supply • AE Faculty • Dr. Memari • Dr. Lepage • Professor Parfitt