1 / 28

Joe Sharkey Structural Option Christiana Hospital 2010 Project Newark, DE

Joe Sharkey Structural Option Christiana Hospital 2010 Project Newark, DE. Introduction Structural Overview Proposed Changes Effects of Sectioning Structure on the Lateral System Post-Tensioned Slab Design Cost/Schedule Comparison Acoustical Design Conclusions. Scope of Presentation.

nola
Download Presentation

Joe Sharkey Structural Option Christiana Hospital 2010 Project Newark, DE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Joe SharkeyStructural OptionChristiana Hospital2010 ProjectNewark, DE

  2. Introduction Structural Overview Proposed Changes Effects of Sectioning Structure on the Lateral System Post-Tensioned Slab Design Cost/Schedule Comparison Acoustical Design Conclusions Scope of Presentation

  3. Introduction • Occupant – Christiana Care • Project Cost - $126 Million • 360,000 ft2 addition • Design-Bid-Build • 8 Story Hospital • 2 Story Conference Wing Creates additional: • 216 Beds • Operating Rooms • Catheterization Labs • Emergency Exam Rooms

  4. Structural Overview Hospital (Main Tower) • 42” thick mat foundation • 9 ½” two-way reinforced concrete slab • 5 ½” drop panels around columns • 24”x24” concrete columns • (11) 12” thick concrete shear walls

  5. Structural Overview Conference Wing • Spread Footings • Steel Framing • 3 ¼” lightweight concrete over 2” metal deck • 4 concentrically braced frames • Large 63’ span at the center

  6. Proposed Changes • Divide Main Tower into two independent structures • Create a more symmetrical building • Reduce lateral load due to torsional effects on shear walls • Reduce size/number of shear walls for cost/schedule savings • Create a post-tensioned design • Deletion of drop panels • Save on formwork/labor • Compare cost and schedule

  7. Effects of Sectioning Structure M 65

  8. Effects of Sectioning Structure CM2 CM1 CR2 CR1

  9. Effects of Sectioning Structure

  10. Effects of Sectioning Structure ASCE7-02 (9.5.2.8 & 9.5.5.7.1)Seismic Use Group: IIII=1.5 Cd=4.5∆amplified=(Cd*∆)/I ∆allowable=0.01h=0.01(118’)=14.16” A C

  11. Effects of Sectioning Structure 65

  12. Post-Tensioned Slab Design Main Tower (First Floor) • Class U (uncracked concrete): ft < 7.5√f’c • 10” Slab • 5000 psi concrete • Largest Span = 30’ • Tendons in groups of 4 @ 6’ o.c. Exterior Span Interior Span 1¼” 1¼” 10” 5” 1¼” 1¼”

  13. Post-Tensioned Slab Design

  14. Uniformly Spaced Tendons Main Tower (First Floor) ½”Ф – 270 ksi unbonded tendons in groups of 4 @ 6’ o.c. Stressing Pockets Expansion Joint

  15. Banded Tendons Main Tower (First Floor) Banded Tendons # Tendons 22 20 18 16 14 12 8 In-Plane Curve > 6:1

  16. Sustained Service Load Deflection Plan ∆max = L/360 = 1”

  17. Uniformly Spaced Tendons Main Tower (Typical Floors) ½”Ф – 270 ksi unbonded tendons in groups of 3 @ 3¾’ o.c. Expansion Joint

  18. Banded Tendons Main Tower (Typical Floors)

  19. Conference Wing (Typical Floor) Prestressed Beam 24x42 w/ 30 Tendons RC Beam 24x42 8#6 T&B 15” Slab Slab Tendons in groups of 3 @ 4 ½’ o.c. RC Beam 16x42 4#7 T&B Prestressed Beam 18x42 w/ 15 Tendons

  20. Construction Management

  21. Construction Management

  22. Acoustics 12’ Ceiling Height Materials Used: 63’ • 5/8” Gypsum 61’ • 4’x4’ Armstrong Optima Ceiling Tiles • Softwall ½” Acousticotton • Carpeting • Upholstered Seats

  23. Acoustics

  24. Acoustics

  25. Acoustics • Benefits: • Target Reverberation Time Met • Cost Savings of $12,591

  26. Conclusions Sectioning Structure into two Independent Structures: • Increased Forces • Required Additional Walls • Increased Both Cost and Schedule Post-Tensioned Design: • Created a Lighter Building • Allowed for Deletion of Drop Panels • Decreased Both Cost and Schedule in Main Tower • Increased Schedule in Conference Wing Acoustical Redesign: • Target Reverberation Time Met • Decreased Cost of Conference Room by $12,591

  27. Acknowledgments • Cagley & Associates • Suncoast Post-Tension • Acoustical Panel Resources • Armstrong • Frank Malits • Joe Ajello • James Lakey • Wilmot Sanz • Sheila Williams • Marjam Supply • AE Faculty • Dr. Memari • Dr. Lepage • Professor Parfitt

  28. Questions

More Related