1 / 7

SRDTOOLS Tools for Evaluating Cohesion Policies for S ustainable R egional D evelopment

SRDTOOLS Tools for Evaluating Cohesion Policies for S ustainable R egional D evelopment. James Medhurst, Project Director Brussels, 11 th November, 2004.

norman-henson
Download Presentation

SRDTOOLS Tools for Evaluating Cohesion Policies for S ustainable R egional D evelopment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SRDTOOLSTools for Evaluating Cohesion Policies for Sustainable Regional Development James Medhurst, Project Director Brussels, 11th November, 2004

  2. European Commission: DG Research incooperation with DG ECFIN and DG ESTAT Framework Programme 6Priority 8.3.1 Task 11 RegioUnderpinning European Integration, Sustainable Development, Competitiveness and Trade PoliciesSpecific Targeted Research or Innovation ProjectProject period:1.1.2005 – 31.12.2007EC contribution: 0.65 M€

  3. Aims of the project - 1 • 1. Build on the ‘four capitals’ model - elaborate the principle linkages and feedback mechanisms, with a view to extending beyond a heuristic framework • 2. Clarify the idea of social welfare used by the model - elaborate the nature of SRD objectives, including the influence of multi-level governance and the use of indicators to measure SRD • 3. Examine the measurement of trade-offs and critical thresholds - especially that between manufactured capital and natural capital, and between manufactured capital and social capital

  4. Aims of the project - 2 • 4. Examine and test the application of spatial planning tools- as a means of integrating policy choices • 5. Explicitly address the requirement for aggregation & weighting of policy impacts - by testing the deliberation matrix approach in selected regional policy and political contexts • 6. Confirm the utility and methods of application of the various evaluation tools - with recommendations to support SRD.

  5. WP1: Research and Workplan Development WP2: Review of the ‘4’ Capitals Model as an WP3: Review of Social Applied Model Welfare & SRD Objectives in EU and MENT Accession Countries WP4: Review of Tradeoffs & Critical Thresholds in EU and WP9: PEER REVIEW Accession Countries WP8: PROJECT MANAGE WP6: Testing of the Deliberation Matrix to WP5: Review and Selected Policy & Testing of Spatial Political Contexts Planning Tools WP7: Confirmation, Recommendation & Dissemination of Tools for SRD

  6. Workshops, Case Studies & Deliverables • Three Team Workshops • Six Case Studies (UK, FR, DE, ES, CZ, SL, PL) • Objectives • Trade-offs • Evaluation • Training Workshops for Decision Makers & Policy Makers • Final Report • Research Publications

  7. Participants • GHK Consulting Ltd (Lead Partner) - UK • Policy Studies Institute (PSI) – UK • University of Versailles (UVSQ) – FR • Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) – UK • Technical University of Darmstadt (TUD) – DE • University of Alcala de Henares (UAH) – ES • Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science – CZ • Regionalna razvojna agencija Mura d.o.o. – SL • Euroreg - University of Warsaw – PL

More Related