420 likes | 796 Views
Dalian Water Supply Project. February 26, 2004 Alyona Dubrovina Jim Horiuchi Henning Hummervoll. Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion. Context. China, 1994 Asian Development Bank considers $160 M investment in a water supply project. 17% Infant mortality rate Cambodia.
E N D
Dalian Water Supply Project February 26, 2004 Alyona Dubrovina Jim Horiuchi Henning Hummervoll
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Context • China, 1994 • Asian Development Bank considers $160 M investment in a water supply project
Problem definition • Which project should be financed?
Agenda • Background • Project description • Analysis • Conclusion
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion China • 1.17 billion people (1994) • Steady reforms since 1978 • GDP growth of 9% per annum • Infrastructure bottlenecks • Tight political controls • Pressures for reforms • Increased trade • WTO
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Dalian Municipality • Important seaport • Technology Development Area • Growing population • 4.7 million in 1997 growing at 3% pa • Water supply shortage • Lowest average supply • Static water tariff level 1952-1992
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Project description
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Scope of Project • Increase water supply • 220 lpcd per person • 2.2 million residents, farming and industry • Project goals • Alleviate water shortage • Improve public health • Support regional growth • Increase water treatment capacity
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Project Mechanism • Transport water • Biliuhe Reservoir Dalian (160 km or 100 miles) • Total project cost: $379.7 million • Project components: • Water conveyor (68 km) • Two pipelines (94 km and 79 km) • Two new pumping stations • Water treatment plant near Dalian • Distribution lines + storage tanks • Project completion by September of 1998
Biliuhe Reservoir • Part B: • Southern Conveyor (2 pipelines of 68 km and 79 km) • Conveying raw water to pumping stations and water treatment plant • Transport treated water through water distribution lines Part A: Northern Conveyor (68 km) Transporting raw water to Wazidian Reservoir Wazidian Pumping Station: Sales of raw water to DWSC takes place Dalian City Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Project Location
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Stakeholders • Executing Agencies • Dalian Water Supply Company • Northern Water Supply Company • Debt holders • Dalian Municipality Government • Asian Development Bank • China Construction Bank and other commercial banks • Other stakeholders • Dalian population, farming community and industries
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusionv Financial Structure: Use of Cash • Total project cost: $379.9 million
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Financial Structure • Sources of Cash • Loans: • ADB • Local commercial banks (China Construction Bank) • PRC government • Ministry of Water Resources • State Planning Commission • Gant from PRC government • Dalian municipality’s own resources
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Financial Structure (continued) • Effectively “all-PRC” funding other than ADB Loan • Enhancement of credibility Local Commercial Banks ADB Debt Service • Execution Agents • Dalian Water Supply Company • Northern Water Supply Company Disbursement Debt Service • Ministry of Water Resources • State Planning Commission Disbursement Loan relent under separate loan agreements Dalian Municipal Government Grant Debt Service Central Government Project Execution & Management
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion ADB Loan: Terms & Conditions • Summary of terms and conditions
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Investment Criteria
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Project cost of capital • Cost of debt 8.51% • US 30-year treasury 7.37% • 1994 Chinese government bonds spread 1.14% • Risk mitigation factors (discussed later) • Cost of equity 15.82% • Market risk premium 3.5% • Sovereign risk premium 8.51% • Equity beta 0.3 • Risk mitigation factors (discussed later) • WACC 10.5% • Capital structure: 53% equity, 47% debt
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Project risk analysis • Dependence on completion of environmental protection and wastewater programs • Agency risks associated with large project and no direct foreign involvement • Availability of inputs • Size and sustainability of reservoir • Stability and cost of power supply • Dependence on tariff increases for profitability • Currency risk • Possible floating of Yuan could result in devaluation and difficulties in repayment of loans in USD as income is in Yuan
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Results of financial analysis • Negative NPV $(474.9)M • IRR 8.9% • Growth rate and discount rate sensitivity: • Base case: Growth rate 9%, discount rate 10.5% Project most likely not attractive to private investors
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Sensitivity Analysis: Key Variables • Key variables: • Water Sales • Water Tariff • Raw water expense • Power expense
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Sensitivity analysis: NPV • Expected NPV $(723) • Less than 2% probability of positive NPV
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Sensitivity analysis: IRR Expected IRR 7.93%
ADB’s perspective • Returns to ADB equal interest rate • Variable interest rate exceeding cost of capital • High probability of default on debt payments 83% • ADB’s debt is expected to be honored at the expense of other debt holders
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Alternative sources of financing • Corporate finance • Municipality owned operating agencies: inefficiencies and agency problems • Illiquid assets Private sources: Highly unlikely • Limited recourse project finance • Elimination of agency problem • Local and state government resistance • Not a Greenfield development • More expensive Private sources: Highly unlikely
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Economic analysis • Benefits: High • Increase GDP, productivity, foreign investment • Improve public health • Eliminate inefficiencies in water sector • Costs: Low • Wastewater treatment • Additional subsidy • Opportunity costs • Risks: Low • In case of operational success economic benefits will be achieved
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion Conclusion • Financial analysis should be enhanced by economic analysis • Unconvincing financial projections • Strong economic benefits and low risks • We recommend to invest in the project
Background Project Description Analysis Conclusion What happened • Loan approved for $160 million • Reappraisal in 1997 extended scope • 2 subprojects implemented to utilize northern conveyor • Economic internal rate of return estimated at 13.4% • Projected completed on time • Knowledge and project skill transfer deemed successful • Opened up for 8 more water supply and wastewater management projects including BOT and international investments