1 / 68

*"Covered Roadways in Urban Settings - Reflections of a Structural Engineer"

*"Covered Roadways in Urban Settings - Reflections of a Structural Engineer" . Harry A Capers, Jr. P.E. . Issues of structural engineering related to public policy specifically dealing with context sensitive design issues in the design of structures.

nyx
Download Presentation

*"Covered Roadways in Urban Settings - Reflections of a Structural Engineer"

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. *"Covered Roadways in Urban Settings - Reflections of a Structural Engineer" Harry A Capers, Jr. P.E.

  2. Issues of structural engineering related to public policy specifically dealing with context sensitive design issues in the design of structures. Focus will be on individual experiences during the planning, design and construction of two urban covered roadway projects built in new jersey around 2000. Comments will reflect concept development, planning of the project, funding issues and determination of architectural and structural scheme Topics to be discussed

  3. Thinking beyond the pavement conference in maryland in 1998 Outcomes - core principles about CSS product and process that can be applied to both project implementation and evaluation. The definition of css was defined by "qualities that characterize excellence in transportation design," "characteristics of the process that yield excellence." These "qualities" and "characteristics" are goals for any css project, and can also be used as evaluation criteria upon its completion. Core Principles of CSS

  4. The project satisfies the purpose and needs as agreed to by a full range of stakeholders. This agreement is forged in the earliest phase of the project and amended as warranted as the project develops. The project is a safe facility for both the user and the community. The project is in harmony with the community, and it preserves environmental, scenic, aesthetic, historic, and natural resource values of the area, i.e., exhibits context sensitive design. The project exceeds the expectations of both designers and stakeholders and achieves a level of excellence in people's minds. The project involves efficient and effective use of the resources (time, budget, community) of all involved parties. The project is designed and built with minimal disruption to the community. The project is seen as having added lasting value to the community. "Qualities that Characterize Excellence in Transportation Design"

  5. Communication with all stakeholders is open, honest, early, and continuous. A multidisciplinary team is established early, with disciplines based on the needs of the specific project, and with the inclusion of the public. A full range of stakeholders is involved with transportation officials in the scoping phase. The purposes of the project are clearly defined, and consensus on the scope is forged before proceeding. The highway development process is tailored to meet the circumstances. This process should examine multiple alternatives that will result in a consensus of approach methods. A commitment to the process from top agency officials and local leaders is secured. The public involvement process, which includes informal meetings, is tailored to the project. The landscape, the community, and valued resources are understood before engineering design is started. A full range of tools for communication about project alternatives is used (e.g., visualization). The Characteristics of the Process that will Yield Excellence in Transportation Design"

  6. NCHRP Report 480: A Guide to Best Practices for Achieving Context Sensitive Solutions http://www.contextsensitivesolutions.org/content/reading/nchrp-report/ http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_480.pdf

  7. Large Project Details for Atlantic City Brigantine Connector • Atlantic City Brigantine ConnectorAtlantic City, NJProject Start: 1997 Project Complete: 2001Project Value: $190,595,000Joint Venture Company:Yonkers/GCCOClient: New Jersey Dept. of TransportationSouth Jersey Transportation AuthorityAtlandia Design & Furnishings, Inc.(A Mirage Resorts Inc. Co.) c/oParsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. 506 Carnegie Center Blvd., 2nd FloorPrinceton, NJ 08540

  8. Project Description: • The joint venture team of Yonkers Contracting Co., Inc. and Granite Construction Company also constructed a 2,900-foot cut and cover tunnel with open depressed roadway sections on either end. The tunnel, which goes under Route 30 and a residential area, included storm water pump stations, ventilation and related electrical/mechanical systems. • The fast-paced project allowed 13 months for design and 28 months for construction and was expected to spur development in the city’s expanding casino area, where three new casino-hotels were to be built.

  9. 72,000 linear feet permanent piling 116,000 cubic yards structural concrete 74,000 tons asphalt pavement 7,400 linear feet AASHTO bridge girders 1,060 tons bridge structural steel 7,300 tons sheetpile shoring 4,330 tons excavation steel bracing 580,000 cubic yards excavation 650,000 cubic yards embankment 50,000 square feet MSE walls 17,000,000 pounds rebar 20,000 linear feet reinforced concrete pipe 24,840 linear feet permanent concrete barrier rail 630,000 square feet waterproofing Work Items:

  10. Bids for the design/build contract on the Atlantic City/Brigantine Connector project were received by Atlandia Design, a subsidiary of Mirage Resorts Incorporated (MRI), The low bid of $190,595,000 was submitted by Yonkers Contracting Company/Granite Construction Company in association with URS Grenier Consultants, Golder Associates, and Schlessinger Associates. Bids of $229,775,000 from Perini Corporation/Slattery Associates in association with E.E. Cruz & Co., and Howard Needles Tammen and Bergendoff, Bids of $329,710,000 from Schiavone Construction Co./Buckley & Company, Inc./Parsons Transportation Group in association with Gannett Fleming, Converse Consultants East, and Parsons Engineering Science Bids Received On A.C./Brigantine Connector Project

  11. NJDOT contributed $95 million from the Transportation Trust Fund. $65 million was donated from the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority $60 million was donated from the SJTA. Payoffs The project permited the development of Marina lands, which when combined with the roadway construction, were estimated to have generated 63,000 construction and supply industry jobs and 33,000 other related jobs. Three proposed casinos slated to be developed on Marina lands were estimated to generate 16,500 permanent jobs and result in $275 million a year in new state and local tax revenues. Borgata opened shortly after the roadway was completed Funding

  12. Construction of the 3000 foot long cut and cover tunnel section of this project for NJDOT required significant groundwater lowering for cuts as deep as 40 feet directly along side the Penrose Canal. The presence of widespread organic silt deposits throughout the this area of Atlantic City raised the concern about settlement due to widespread groundwater lowering that would be expected with conventional dewatering in highly permeable soils. The contractor installed a system of 100 deep wells within the tight interlocking steel sheeting that was driven to a 60-foot depth to provide a partial groundwater cut-off. The installed dewatering system provided dry sub grade down to elevation –30 for a period of 16 months. The project was completed with no interruption in groundwater lowering or subsequent excavation and structural work. No settlement was experienced. Design/Build DewateringProgram for the BrigantineConnector, Atlantic City, NJ

  13. BUILDING THE CONNECTOR: • The tunnel, which has a 14-foot clearance, travels under a landscaped park and a residential area. • It parallels a canal where the excavation ranged between 10 and 35 feet deep, and extends into loose sands some 30 feet below the water table. • Supporting the sub-grade structure are storm water pump stations (one of which is 45 feet deep), ventilation systems, and related electrical and mechanical systems.

  14. DESIGN COMPROMISES: The Atlantic City-Brigantine Connector has four 12-foot-wide lanes (two lanes in each direction), with each carriageway separated by a three-foot-high concrete ("Jersey") barrier. There are no shoulders along the section near Brigantine Boulevard, and limited-width shoulders on the elevated section and in the tunnel itself (only on the curves).

  15. Other Design Compromises: In order to have the ramps for Bacharach Boulevard placed without having steep grades from either the Atlantic City Expressway or the Marina Tunnel, a two-track railroad grade crossing was constructed at this location. Advance warning signals alert motorists of trains approximately one-quarter mile before the crossing. Nevertheless, one pro-transit group, the Delaware Valley Association of Rail Passengers, raised questions about the railroad crossing located near the Atlantic City-New Jersey Transit rail terminal.

  16. And More Compromises • The ramp from Bacharach Boulevard to the eastbound connector lacks an acceleration lane; all traffic entering the connector must come to a full stop. Construction of such a lane would have required a prohibitively expensive relocation of the Atlantic Energy power facility. • Owing to these design compromises, the speed limit along the length of the connector is 35 MPH. Also owing to the design of the roadway, vehicles carrying hazardous materials are prohibited from using the connector.

  17. Route 29 Waterfront ImprovementsTrenton, Mercer County

  18. Project Start: 1998 Project Complete: 2003Project Value: $71 million (Roadway only) $15 Million for Deck Park Contractor: Joint Venture Company:PKF Mark III/NCI joint venture Designer DMJM+Harris Client: New Jersey Dept. of Transportation Route 29 Waterfront ImprovementsTrenton, Mercer County

  19. The long-time residents of historic Lamberton Street in downtown TrentonN.J., live in 100-year-old brick row houses that are surrounded by mature trees. Lamberton Street connected State Route 29, primarily a four- to six-lane freeway running along the Delaware River, with Interstate 295. In the mid-1990s, the New Jersey Department of Transportation recognized that the situation was unacceptable from the traffic, environmental and human perspective, and undertook the Route 29 tunnel and its companion deck park project to ensure efficient traffic operations and improve the quality of life in the area. Project Need

  20. Community Cooperation - CSD • NJDOT began working with the community in 1996 Original proposal was to expand Route 29 into a six-lane highway. • The meetings outcomes included • a park on the deck over the Route 29 tunnel • input in the design, safety, maintenance, recreation and historical and architectural elements for the deck park. • Construction on the deck park, South River Walk, began in the Summer of 2002 with construction completed in December 2003. • Community Partnering Team was established and meetings continue

  21. Context Sensitive Design • NJDOT formally incorporated it into its procedures in 1999. • Community Partnering Team Goals were identified and sub-committees formed to address: • Steering • Landscape and design • Project coordination - Natural resources • Bikepath - Pedestrian - Multimodal • Safety - Security - Maintenance • Funding • Local issues • Parking

  22. Community Partnering Team • The Community Partnering Team focus: • Shoreline mitigation at Duck Island • Boat docks and pedestrian access at Waterfront Park • Parking garage for the stadium and office buildings • South River Walk Park • Bike path from Stacy Park to the Assumpink Creek • North River Walk

  23. All of the facilities will be linked by a continuous bicyclist and pedestrian path from Stacy Park to Duck Island. Signs will direct bicyclists and pedestrians to other waterfront amenities. Will link to the Trenton Marriott Hotel, the Heritage Trails to the Philadelphia East Coast Greenway to Newark, the capital to coast connecting the shore trails to the east and the Delaware & Raritan Canal to Lambertville/New Hope to the north. Bike Path

  24. Boat Docks • The Mercer County docks, located on the Delaware River starting in front of the Waterfront Park Baseball Stadium, will add 1,000 feet of access to the Trenton waterfront on the Delaware River. • A second phase of this project will include an amphitheater for programmed or informal events, an interactive fountain for family fun and a waterside plaza that will be a focal point for the north and south river walks.

  25. North River Walk • A fishing wharf, is located immediately south of the Northeast Corridor railroad bridge. This area will accommodate fishing and passive recreational activities. • The southern portion will be a landscaped esplanade with benches. The northern section has been designed with fishermen in mind.

  26. Shoreline Mitigation • NJDOT's Open Water Mitigation Project created a shallow water habitat along the eastern bank of the Delaware River in the vicinity of Duck Island. The habitat area is twice the size of the original habitat located at the foot of the tunnel.The enlarged shallow water marsh is incorporated as part of the Hamilton-Trenton Marsh and will provide additional habitat diversity for the approximately 234 species of birds found in this area.This work is in keeping with NJDOT's mission to build transportation projects in an environmentally responsible manner. It also satisfies the permit requirements set forth by the Army Corps of Engineers and the NJ Department of Environmental Protection for the construction for the Route 29 tunnel.

  27. The Roadway Project • The NJ 29 project included construction of four 12ft-wide lanes (two lanes in each direction), 12ft wide shoulders and a concrete ('Jersey') barrier to separate opposing traffic flows. • The NJ Route 29 project was included as part of the 1998 'TEA-21' Federal transportation bill. The contractor's bid for the project was $71 million. • The entire project was completed in 20 months.

  28. Route 29 Tunnel • The design build contract was awarded to PKF mark III/NCI joint venture • DMJM+Harris designed a bonded post-tensioned solution • The contractor was able to increase the pours from 50’ to 100’ thus reducing the overall project schedule by 50% using mass concrete placement methods • Longitudinal PT was used in the tunnel base slab, walls and roof slab. Additional transverse PT was added to the roof slab to provide reinforcement for the 3’ soil backfill for a community park. • The multistrand PT system consisted of 3 strand tendons in the center wall, 12 strand tendons in the east wall and 17 strand tendons in the base slab. Larger, 31 strand tendons were used in the roof slab where the tunnel reached a maximum width of 110’. The tunnel west side was designed with equally spaced 3’ columns creating an open view of the Delaware river.

  29. RIVERFRONT PARK • The engineering consulting firm Vollmer Associates, the NJDOT built a $15 million, 6.5-acre park atop the deck of the NJ 29 tunnel. • Completed in 2003, the park features trees, landscaping and an interpretive area highlighting the history of the South Trenton waterfront.

  30. South River Walk • A 6.5-acre urban park was constructed over the tunnel section of Route 29. The park offers a bicyclist and pedestrian walkway, lawn areas, pavilions, a children's playground, an historic interpretive area and an urban streetscape plan along Lamberton Street.

  31. Park Design • The park features • permanent historic exhibits composed of sculptural arches representing five centuries of Trenton area history, • a timeline of date stones, • informative bronze plaques and signs commemorating the history of the Trenton area. • The project involved complex, multi-faceted historical and archaeological issues, significant research, subsurface testing, data recovery and monitoring during construction.

  32. Underground Transportation Systems Safety, Operations & Emergency Response by Harry A. Capers, Jr. PE Office of Transportation Security International Technology Scanning Program NCHRP National Cooperative Highway Research Program American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Federal Highway Administration

  33. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards NFPA 130 Standard for Fixed Guideway Transit and Passenger Rail Systems NFPA 502 Standard for Road Tunnels, Bridges, and Other Limited Access Highways No AASHTO Standards exist Current US Practice

  34. UTS Scan Countries Rome September 23 – October 9, 2005

  35. 34 technologies of interest 9 for further consideration Key: Innovative design and emergency management Used for both natural and man-made disasters Findings

  36. Human Factors video

  37. Gotthard Tunnel Fire on October 24, 2001

  38. Gotthard Tunnel Fire on October 24, 2001

  39. Escape Route Signs that are Universal and Consistent – Visual, Audible, Tactile Widespread uniformity promotes understanding. In an incident, confusion is minimized. Use of combined senses (visual, audible, tactile) increases effectiveness. U.S - National Fire Protection Association codes should include human factors considerations. Findings - 1

  40. Visual AudibleTactile

  41. Escape Routeand Signage Universal and Consistent Signs in Mont Blanc Tunnel

  42. Universal and Consistent Signs

  43. Guidelines for Existing and New Tunnels Need AASHTO tunnel guidelines Planning, design, construction, maintenance, inspection, and operations Note: AASHTO Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures created Technical Committee for Tunnels, T-20 Findings - 2

  44. Scope – “This committee is concerned with all factors pertinent to the design and construction of highway tunnels and their components, including design, construction, inspection, maintenance, and security, including designing for and responding to manmade and natural hazards. Highway tunnels as recognized by this committee include covered roadways confined on both edges equal to or greater than ? feet in length along centerline of roadway regardless of type of structure or method of construction.” T-20 Technical Committee on Tunnels - Scope

  45. Development and maintenance of design, inspection and construction specifications specifically related to highway tunnels. Coordination with other AASHTO Committees as necessary on cross cut issues. Deployment of and AASHTO approved Highway Tunnel Management System. Identification of research needs and development, review of and recommend for committee consideration research problem statements related to highway tunnels. Represent the SCOBS as necessary to other agencies on matters pertaining to highway tunnels. T-20 Technical Committee on Tunnels - Responsibilities

  46. Issues to consider: Emergency pull-out areas and variable message signs

More Related