Interactive Gaming Council Board Meeting I-Gaming Legal status

1. THIBAULT VERBIEST Attorney-at-law at the Brussels and Paris Bars Founding Partner of ULYS LawFirm www.ulys.net Professor at the University of Paris I Sorbonne London, 26 January 2004 Thibault.verbiest@ulys.net Interactive Gaming Council Board MeetingI-Gaming Legal status

2. no : EC Law not applicable art :49 freedom to provide services 1)economic activity ? Restrictions may be imposed, provided that 3) art.49 not discriminatory ? 4) art. 46 justified by the Treaty ?  Yes : 2) goods or service ? 5) necessary and proportionate ? art.30 E-Gaming: the European regulatory perspective E C T R E A T Y I N F O S O C I E T Y • The Internal Market Strategy for Services • remove all remaining barriers in the Internal Market • Directive 98/48 : e-gaming is an information society service • e-gaming regulation must be notified • Electronic commerce  Directive : Internal Market clause • Member States may not impose additional obligations • Proposal for a Directive on Services in the Internal Market • Create a real Internal Market – Home Country control

3. first I-gaming case brought before the EC Court Opinion of Advocate-General Alber (13.03.2003): the Italian legislation in the field of sports betting imposed a discriminatory measure and - in view of the facts of the case - failed the required justification on grounds of general interest The Gambelli Case - Background

4. Is it a landmark decision? application by analogy to “remote gambling” Confirmation of the Schindler decision § 59 “Article 4 of Law No 401/89, constitute a restrictionon the freedom of establishment and on the freedom to provide services.” § 60 & 65:“the restrictions must be justifiedby imperative requirements in the general interest, be suitable for achieving the objective which they pursue and not go beyond what is necessary in order to attain it. They must in any event be applied without discrimination” §66: “It is for the national court to decide whether …. satisfy those conditions. To that end… “ Nothing new under the sun? The Gambelli Case - Decision

5. § 66: “... To that end, it will be for that court to take account of the issues set out in the following paragraphs.” Consistent gaming policy? Directing the discretional power of the national court Reasons of justification Discriminatory character Proportionate & necessary The Gambelli Case - Decision

6. The Court does formally conclude that the Italian legislation is infringing one of the ground principles of European Community law BUT: says not formally whether justified (outside its competence?) However, by directing the national court, its conclusionshould be similar to the opinion of A.G. Alber Internal Gaming Market? Too soon to cheer? Initiative from the European Commission Gambelli Case: final considerations

7. 1. Electronic Commerce Directive Free provision of information society services and the internal market clause Article 1.5: excludes gaming activities from the coordinated field Review every two years Initiative of the EU Commission?

8. Press release 21 November 2003 First Report on application of the Electronic Commerce Directive Applying to e-commerce the Internal Market principle of the freedom to provide services, is already "having a substantial and positive effect” Initiative of the EU Commission

9. “Online gambling, which is currently outside the scope of the Directive, is anew area in which action may be required because of significant Internal Market problems - see for example Case C-243/01s of the European Court of Justice (ECJ press release CJE/03/98), concerning criminal proceedings in Italy against persons collecting Internet bets on behalf of a bookmaker legally licensed in the UK.The Commission will examine the need for and scope of a possible new EU initiative. In addition, the Commission is examining a number of complaints it has received concerning cross-border gambling activities. “ Initiative of the EU Commission?

10. Proposal for a Directive on Services in the Internal Market create a real Internal Market for services, including gambling services Application of the country of origin principle (Home Country control) Cf. article 3 of the e-commerce Directive a UK established bookmaker will only be subject to UK legislation and Italian authorities must recognize the adequate character of the protection offered in the UK. Therefore, they cannot impose additional restrictions on the operation of the UK bookmaker. Exception for “sensitive areas”, including gambling services development of specific rules by 2010. From 2005 on present harmonized EU-wide rules on gambling services Commission will launch a study on the current legal and market situation 1991: Gambling in the Single Market Now time to react and set up representative organisation Initiative of the EU Commission

11. to get positive feedback from all the stakeholders legal arguments & market reality (cross-border) I-gaming operators = cowboys of a new economy ? well-organized response will be more effective than the efforts of individual operators Prevent potential conflicts of interest Counter lobby effort of the state owned gaming organizations Need for a representative organistation? Yes, • By 2010 EU gaming market will be restructured • time to start a dialogue with the Commision

12. I thank you for your attention ! ? Thibault.Verbiest@ulys.net www.ulys.net