640 likes | 878 Views
Public and Private School Choice in Greater Hartford: A Brief Overview and Computer Mapping Analysis Jack Dougherty and Naralys Estevez Trinity College, Hartford CT presented at the “Who Chooses Schools and Why?” conference October 11, 2005 http://www.trincoll.edu/depts/educ/css.
E N D
Public and Private School Choice in Greater Hartford: A Brief Overview and Computer Mapping AnalysisJack Dougherty and Naralys EstevezTrinity College, Hartford CTpresented at the “Who Chooses Schools and Why?” conferenceOctober 11, 2005http://www.trincoll.edu/depts/educ/css
School choice over time 1) private & parochial schools
School choice over time 1) private & parochial schools Source: State of Connecticut, Report of the Board of Education to the Governor, 1930-31
School choice over time 2) residential choice
School choice over time 2) residential choice
School choice over time 2) residential choice
School choice over time 2) residential choice
School choice over time 2) residential choice
School choice over time 2) residential choice Hartford Courant, May 1, 1960
School choice over time 2) residential choice Hartford Courant, May 1, 1960
School choice over time 1) private and parochial schools 2) residential choice
School choice over time 1) private and parochial schools 2) residential choice Both forms of school choice required special access (wealth, racial privilege, religious identity), so “choice” was not freely available to all.
5 new programs expanding school choice - but designed for different purposes
1) Capitol Region Choice Program • Since 1998, state-sponsored program to reduce racial isolation and promote higher achievement through voluntary transfers between urban and suburban public school districts (K-12); administered by CREC • Revision of Project Concern (1966-1998) • Approximately 1000 student participants on space-available basis, with lottery • To be expanded under Sheff settlement
1) Capitol Region Choice Program • Since 1998, state-sponsored program to reduce racial isolation and promote higher achievement through voluntary transfers between urban and suburban public school districts (K-12); administered by CREC • Revision of Project Concern (1966-1998) • Approximately 1000 student participants on space-available basis, with lottery • To be expanded under Sheff settlement
2) Magnet Schools • In response to 1996 Sheff decision, state support for interdistrict magnet schools to reduce racial & economic isolation and promote higher achievement • Magnet schools “attract” families with curricular themes
2) Magnet Schools • In response to 1996 Sheff decision, state support for interdistrict magnet schools to reduce racial & economic isolation and promote higher achievement • Magnet schools “attract” families with curricular themes • Currently 19 interdistrict magnets in Hartford region; most managed by CREC or HPS • To be expanded under Sheff settlement
2) Magnet Schools Comparison of Learning Corridor magnet schools, 2004-05
2) Magnet Schools Comparison of Learning Corridor magnet schools, 2004-05
Comparison of Learning Corridor magnet schools, 2004-05 HMMS MMS Student Participation (by town) GHAMAS GHAA
3) Charter Schools • 1997 state law allows independent public schools, accountable to charter-granting agency • License to innovate to improve student achievement and make efforts to reduce isolation; enrollment by lottery if necessary • Currently 2 charter schools in Hartford area
3) Charter Schools • 1997 state law allows independent public schools, accountable to charter-granting agency • License to innovate to improve student achievement and make efforts to reduce isolation; enrollment by lottery if necessary • Currently 2 charter schools in Hartford area
3) Charter Schools • 1997 state law allows independent public schools, accountable to charter-granting agency • License to innovate to improve student achievement and make efforts to reduce isolation; enrollment by lottery if necessary • Currently 2 charter schools in Hartford area
3) Charter Schools • 1997 state law allows independent public schools, accountable to charter-granting agency • License to innovate to improve student achievement and make efforts to reduce isolation; enrollment by lottery if necessary • Currently 2 charter schools in Hartford area
3) Charter Schools • 1997 state law allows independent public schools, accountable to charter-granting agency • License to innovate to improve student achievement and make efforts to reduce isolation; enrollment by lottery if necessary • Currently 2 charter schools in Hartford area
3) Charter Schools • 1997 state law allows independent public schools, accountable to charter-granting agency • License to innovate to improve student achievement and make efforts to reduce isolation; enrollment by lottery if necessary • Currently 2 charter schools in Hartford area
4) Children’s Educational Opportunity Foundation of Connecticut (CEO)
4) Children’s Educational Opportunity Foundation of Connecticut (CEO) • Operating since 1998 in Hartford, a privately-funded school choice program for low-income families (no more than 200% above federal poverty guidelines)
4) Children’s Educational Opportunity Foundation of Connecticut (CEO) • Operating since 1998 in Hartford, a privately-funded school choice program for low-income families (no more than 200% above federal poverty guidelines) • Up to $1700 scholarship to subsidize private or parochial school tuition for grades K-5; renewable up to grade 8
4) Children’s Educational Opportunity Foundation of Connecticut (CEO) CEO Students 2004-05 • Operating since 1998 in Hartford, a privately-funded school choice program for low-income families (no more than 200% above federal poverty guidelines) • Up to $1700 scholarship to subsidize private or parochial school tuition for grades K-5; renewable up to grade 8
4) Children’s Educational Opportunity Foundation of Connecticut (CEO) CEO Students 2004-05
4) Children’s Educational Opportunity Foundation of Connecticut (CEO) CEO Students 2004-05
5) Mayor Perez’s Independent Schools Initiative • Announced July 2005, a privately-funded school choice program designed to increase college attendance rate for Hartford high school students • Pledges from 17 independent college prep schools for $11 million in scholarships and financial aid to be phased in over 4 years • Approx 200 Hartford students enrolled under partnership --Courant July 22, 2005
5) Mayor Perez’s Independent Schools Initiative • Announced July 2005, a privately-funded school choice program designed to increase college attendance rate for Hartford high school students • Pledges from 17 independent college prep schools for $11 million in scholarships and financial aid to be phased in over 4 years • Approx 200 Hartford students enrolled under partnership --Courant July 22, 2005
• Capitol Region Choice Program • Magnet Schools • Charter Schools • CEO Foundation • Mayor’s Independent Schools Initiative
What do we currently know about these five choice programs? • Capitol Region Choice Program • Magnet Schools • Charter Schools • CEO Foundation • Mayor’s Independent Schools Initiative
What do we currently know about these five choice programs? Individual levels of knowledge are high for specific programs, but relatively few studies have been published & shared with the broader community
Question: Who chooses schools and why? - insights from prospective parent interviews
Question: Who chooses schools and why? - insights from prospective parent interviews • Trinity students conducting interviews with prospective parents at magnet school open house, January 2005
Question: Who chooses schools and why? - insights from computer mapping (GIS)
How does computer mapping work? Choice program agrees to share applicants’ street address data (restricted access to protect individual family confidentiality)
How does computer mapping work? Street map