1 / 16

Space Reallocation and the Faculty of Arts

Space Reallocation and the Faculty of Arts. Responding to the Acquisition of 3465 Durocher. Background. June 15, 2006: University confirms acquisition of 3465 Durocher and informs Faculties of Arts, Law and Education of subsequent space reallocation

odetta
Download Presentation

Space Reallocation and the Faculty of Arts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Space Reallocation and the Faculty of Arts Responding to the Acquisition of 3465 Durocher

  2. Background • June 15, 2006: University confirms acquisition of 3465 Durocher and informs Faculties of Arts, Law and Education of subsequent space reallocation • Designed to be consistent with 2 concepts of University Master Plan • Remove non-academic functions from central campus • Geographic consolidation of Faculty activities • Principal Move: Accounting from Ferrier to 3465 Durocher

  3. Summary of Space Changes to Faculties

  4. Challenges and Opportunities • Immediate Challenge • Relocate current and planned activities from NCDH and 3715 Peel • Determine best use of Ferrier space • Opportunity • Think comprehensively about use of space • Leverage reallocation budgetary envelope to Faculty’s advantage • Principles • Avoid multiple moves • Group units in an intellectually coherent manner

  5. Process • June to December • gathering technical information, identifying alternatives and evaluating feasibility of alternatives • September to January • Presentation to every Faculty and Chairs meeting as plans developed • Special meeting of Chairs on space • Presentation to Faculty Space Committee and two presentations to Faculty Planning Committee • 3 meetings with AUS executive and AUS town hall • English-French Working Group on Arts Building • Special meeting on classroom design • Numerous individual/group consultations and site tours with those affected

  6. Summary of Major Moves • To Peterson • CDAS, IDP Advising, IOWC, STANDD, Indigenous Rights, CIREQ • [Archeology Lab, Technology & Citizenship, Experimental Econ lab, Social Stats lab, QICSS lab] • To Arts • French Department from Peterson • Conversion of classrooms and VRC to offices and common space • To Ferrier 3 • Arts Computer Labs from Leacock • History offices from Leacock and associated projects from NCDH • To Ferrier 2 • Arts Computer Techs from Leacock • AHCS: Associated research projects and VRC from Arts • To Leacock 1 • Classroom capacity from Arts and multi-use student rooms

  7. Cost Estimates • Ferrier: 521,031 • 327,541 for computer labs • Leacock 1 and 2: 956,316 • 210,515 for Leacock 2 • Arts West: 398,430 • Arts: 1,107,003 • 429,932 for electrical upgrade • Total: 2,982,780

  8. Notes on Costs • Total includes Facilities Management 35% mark up for professional fees, project contingency, project administration • Electrical upgrades in Arts probably should have been done long ago, and will certainly have to be done in the future • Leacock 2 renovations are not critical • Computer lab estimates lower than expected

  9. Appendix Detailed Lists of Relocations By Building

  10. Relocation of 3715 Peel

  11. Relocation: NCDH

  12. Relocation: NCDH(Continued)

  13. Relocation: 3465 Peel/3475 Peel

  14. Relocation: Peterson

  15. Relocation: Leacock

  16. Relocation: Arts/Dawson

More Related