1 / 19

Bicycle Parking: Levels of Service

Bicycle Parking: Levels of Service. John Luton, Executive Director Capital Bike and Walk Society Victoria, BC. Institute of Transportation Engineers Quad Conference Victoria, BC April 2008. Thanks.

omer
Download Presentation

Bicycle Parking: Levels of Service

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bicycle Parking: Levels of Service John Luton, Executive Director Capital Bike and Walk Society Victoria, BC Institute of Transportation Engineers Quad Conference Victoria, BC April 2008 www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  2. Thanks • Development of detailed bike parking guidelines and the level of service concept have been aided by: • Bunt Engineering – supported presentation at ITE in Portland and have been using consultant services to develop site specific solutions – very useful in identifying elements that needed definition • Mountain Equipment Co-op – sponsors of our bicycle parking manual • Translink – co-sponsors of the bicycle parking manual and supporters of our “Bicycle Parking On-line” project – now in development www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  3. Summary • Illustrate bike parking • Assess state of the art • Propose a system • Summarize elements • Describe Process • Invite Feedback www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  4. State of the Art www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  5. Why a grading system? • Provide a simple system of rating racks and assessing plans • Potentially provide more specific guidance for LEEDs systems? % of single point? • Rate efficiency of installations www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  6. Current Info • Guidance for advocates and practitioners • Numerous other sources • Ongoing requests for evaluations of individual racks, site plans etc. www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  7. Principles of Good Design • Works for a variety of bicycle types • Intuitive – use is obvious • Supports bike frame at two points in a horizontal plane • Accommodates common locks • Provides security for frame and wheels • Minimizes tangling or damage to bikes • Minimizes hazards or obstructions in pedestrian environment • Space efficient • Aesthetic www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  8. Examples Racks rated A • Meets all tests www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  9. Example 2 Rack rated B • Meets tests but falls short on aesthetics, finish • Corkscrew rack pretty but can tangles bikes www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  10. Example 3 Rack rated C+ • Functional rack but falls short on some elements • Used as intended, only bikes at ends are properly supported • Meter rack still allows bike to pivot and fall www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  11. Example 4 Rack rated D • Minimally functional but missing important features of good racks • Fails to support at two points • Inefficient footprint www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  12. Example 5 Rack rated F • Fails to satisfactorily provide essential elements of a functional bike rack www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  13. Rating site design • Identifying critical elements of successful site design • Points system proposal: Public short term bike parking • 20 points good racks • 15 points proximate to destination • 15 points informal surveillance • 10 points efficient footprint • 15 points weather protected • 25 points aesthetics, pedestrian friendly etc., finish, maintenance, security www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  14. Example 1 Successful installation • Good rack • Destination accessible • Visible • Minimal hazards • Possible rating of 85 (no weather protection) www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  15. Example 2 Bad installation • Poor rack choice • Poor location • Space inefficient • Possible rating of 30 (racks may hold some bikes, near destination but not ideal, some surveillance, footprint doesn’t quite work, but well maintained) www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  16. Efficiency Ratings • Simple percentages • Informs points system Example • 30 % Efficient Rack • Concrete feet prevent bikes close enough to lock • Half of rack facing wall not accessible • 3 of 10 spaces rack is designed for can be used www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  17. Process for confirming ratings • Meeting with practitioners • Presentations to cycling committees and organizations • Focus group workshops • Surveys and on-line feedback www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  18. In Progress • Workplaces and Residential Bike Parking • Different needs, different standards • Next steps: Bicycle Parking On-Line • Manual • Case studies • New ideas and unique solutions www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

  19. Questions and Answers? www.capitalbikeandwalk.org

More Related