1 / 14

2006 Security and Emergency Management Conference

2006 Security and Emergency Management Conference. Towards a Standard for Education Campus Security Stephen WATSON MACE MISE MRMIA. Why we need Standards. Guidance and Information for Industry Professionals and other Stakeholders;

orenda
Download Presentation

2006 Security and Emergency Management Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2006 Security and Emergency Management Conference Towards a Standard for Education Campus Security Stephen WATSON MACE MISE MRMIA Fences or Flowers

  2. Why we need Standards • Guidance and Information for Industry Professionals and other Stakeholders; • Uniformity and Conformity of Practice and Procedure within the sector. Fences or Flowers

  3. Fences or Flowers • Benefits of an Open Campus: • Promoting a learning environment; • Promoting the values of Higher Education – demonstrating what is taught! • Open to the Community and a part of the Community. Fences or Flowers

  4. Campus Protective Security • Primary Barrier is usually the building perimeter; • Many buildings built in the 1960’s through 1980’s; • Building Fabric and Teaching Utilities renovated and upgraded but some (most?) security features remain as original. Fences or Flowers

  5. Other Campus Security Issues • Changes in what is being taught (technology and use of technology); • Changes in building use; • Contents are more portable and negotiable on illicit markets; • Changes in Public Liability risks. Fences or Flowers

  6. Trends in Crime • BOCSAR and ABS reported crime statistics show a general downwards trend in relevant crime within the community; • Downward trend not evidenced on TEF Campuses. Fences or Flowers

  7. How the need has developed • Risk Transference • A Target Rich Environment for Criminals: • Laptop Computers; • Light Projectors; • New Millenium Equipment protected by 1970’s Technology. Fences or Flowers

  8. Absence of a Relevant Single Comprehensive Standard • The Absence of a Relevant Single Comprehensive Standard has led to a diversity of less than optimal responses to protective security risk situations largely attributable to inputs by Key Stakeholders (Budget Issues). Fences or Flowers

  9. Why we need a Standard for Education Campus Security • Cost effective application of Protective Security Measures; • Guidance for Industry Professionals; • Guidance for “Other Stake Holders”. Fences or Flowers

  10. Some Similar and Relevant Standards • AS 4485: Security for health care facilities; • AS/NZS 4360: Risk Management; • AS 2201: Intruder alarm systems; • AS 4421: Guards and patrols; • AS/NZS 7799: Information security management. Fences or Flowers

  11. What do we need in the Standard • Intrusion Detection; • CCTV; • Access Control Systems; • Lighting, Line of Sight and related CPTED provisions; • Protective Barriers; Fences or Flowers

  12. What do we need in the Standard • Pedestrian Safety; • Emergency Response – First Aid to Fire and Major Disaster response; • Lockers and other private uncontrolled secure spaces; • Other matters determined by proper consideration. Fences or Flowers

  13. How do we advance towards a Standard for TEF Security? • Agreement that we need a Standard; • Sufficient consensus on content to commence development; • Request to Standards Australia. Fences or Flowers

  14. Thank You Questions - Please Fences or Flowers

More Related