250 likes | 358 Views
Wildcats, ballots, interdicts and damages. Strike law under siege. Strikes: extent, illegality and violence. Strike rates dropped after 1995 LRA 4 million work days lost pre 1995 to 650 000 in 1997 Started rising again from 2002 20 million work days (public sector strike) in 2010
E N D
Wildcats, ballots, interdicts and damages Strike law under siege
Strikes: extent, illegality and violence • Strike rates dropped after 1995 LRA • 4 million work days lost pre 1995 to 650 000 in 1997 • Started rising again from 2002 • 20 million work days (public sector strike) in 2010 • 2 million work days in 2011 • Illegal strikes • Illegal strikes dropped significantly after 1995 • Started rising from 2002 • 45 of 99 strikes in 2012 illegal • Violence • Last 13 years • 181 killed/313 injured/3000 arrested for pubic violence • 2009 to July 2011 • 1377 arrested for public violence/217 charged/9 convicted
Outline • International law and the Constitution • LRA’s approach to strikes and pickets • Increase in extent and illegality of strikes and violence • Legislative responses • Judicial responses
International law and the Constitution • Constitutional Court in Numsa v Bader Bop • Whether minority union can strike for organisational rights • Section 23 guarantees a worker’s right to join a union a union and the right to strike • Interpreted in the light of ILO Conventions 87 and 98 and the principles developed by the ILO supervisory machinery • Constitution and International law constitutes the framework to evaluate responses to illegal strikes
International law framework • SA has ratified Convention 87 on Freedom of Association • That Convention has been interpreted to include the right to strike even thought the right is not specifically mentioned • By the ILO Committee on Freedom of Association, an ILO body established to hear and recommend action in respect of Freedom of Association complaints • By the ILO Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations • The observations and decisions of these two committees hold- • The right is not absolute • The right may be curtailed in relation to circumstances, participants, object, and procedure • If curtailed, there must be compensatory guarantees
LRA’s approach to strikes • LRA drafted in accordance with Convention 87 and section 27 of Interim Constitution (now section 23) • To give effect to the right to strike • To encourage orderly, rational and lawful strikes • To harness it principally to collective bargaining • To limit the economic and social damage
LRA’s approach to strikes • Simple strike procedure • To limit interdicts on technicalities • Separate procedures for secondary strikes and protest action • Compulsory conciliation • To facilitate negotiation • Agreed picketing rules • Regulation of replacement labour • Prohibition of strikes in essential services and minimum services
Legislative responses • Threatened legislative responses • Declaring education to be an essential service • Making a strike ballot a requirement for a protected strike • LRA amendments • Only members can now picket (removal of supporters) • Court power to suspend strike or picket or suspend use of replacement labour • Restructuring of the essential services committeewith the power to appoint panels • Power of a panel to determine a minimum service in the absence of a collective agreement
What is an Essential service? • Committee on Freedom of Association definition • A service the interruption of which would endanger the life, personal safety or health of the whole or part of the population • Examples: air traffic control, telephone services, fire-fighting services, health and ambulance services, the security services, water and electricity services • What is not an essential service • Radio & TV, petrol sector, ports, banks, computer services, postal services, refuse collection….education sector • But the CFA has held that it is permissible to limit the right to strike of school principals or vice-principals
What is a minimum service? • The Committee on Freedom of association has recognised that minimum services may be established in essential services and in public services of fundamental importance • Minimum service must be- • Limited exclusively to the operations strictly necessary to meet the basic needs of the of the population or minimum requirements of the service • One that is defined with the participation of the unions involved • Disagreements must not be resolved by the government but by an independent body • CEACR has considered that it is permissible to have a minimum service for public education.
LRA and essential and minimum services • Essential services • CFA definition • Police • Parliament • Minimum services • Only within an essential service • By collective agreement ratified by the essential service committee
Education • Constitutional right to education – section 29 of the Constitution • Constitutional right to education is concerned with education as a whole • Such as closing schools or failing to establish schools where no schools are available • Beauvallon Secondary School case • Access to schools – refusing to allow learners to enter schools on grounds of language • Mikro case and Ermelo Hoerskool case
Education • A strike although it interrupts education does not deny learners their right to education • No different from public holidays, World Cup extension of holidays, sick leave • Not an essential service because the interruption of education does not in the ordinary course endanger the health and safety of the population • However a case may be made out for a minimum service to ensure that learners that come to school are supervised for their protection • That would be permissible under section 72 of the LRA
Strike ballot • LRA’s approach to strike ballots • Constitution of every registered trade union must require a ballot of affected members before a strike • No member may be disciplined for failure to participate in a strike if no ballot was held or, if held, a majority of those who voted did not vote in favour • The failure to hold a ballot does not constitute grounds for any litigation affecting the legality or protected status of a strike • LRA amendment to make it a requirement for a protected strike withdrawn
Strike ballot • Committee of Freedom of Association • Permissible to require a strike ballot of members • Permissible to set the quorum provided that it does not require an absolute majority of workers affected • Normally set at the majority of those who voted rather than the majority of members affected • In other words the amendment would have been ILO compliant
Picketing • LRA’s approach • Registered union can authorise a picket by members and supporter to peacefully demonstrate support for a protected strike • Held in any public place outside employer premises or with the employer’s permission inside the premises • If requested, Commission must facilitate agreed picketing rules failing which must determine the rules • Disputes concerning picketing to be referred to CCMA and if not resolved to the Labour Court
Picketing • LRA amendments • Only members can now picket in terms of the LRA • Supporters would not be protected unless they were given permission under the Regulation of Gatherings Act • Court’s power to suspend a strike, picket, lockout or use of replacement labour in picketing disputes • Although picketing disputes are broadly defined, the power to suspend a strike should only be used in cases of violence or intimidation • Suspension of picketing could be justified in cases of violence or intimidation or in the absence of picketing rules • Although suspension of picketing should go together with an order to prohibit the use of replacement labour to ensure that the power dynamic is not affected by the intervention
Picketing • Effect of suspension of a strike • Courts are likely to interpret the effect of suspension as a temporary lifting of protection for the duration of the suspension • If not, a failure to return to work would nevertheless be a breach of contract and if deliberate contempt of court • If not, a continuation of the strike by the union would be contempt of court
Picketing • Committee on Freedom of Association • Prohibition of picketing only justifiable if strike ceases to be peaceful • Permissible to prohibit pickets from disturbing the public order or threatening non-strikers • ‘The exercise of the right to strike the freedom of non-strikers… as well as the right of management to enter the premises of the enterprise’.
Judicial response: interdicts • Interdicts • Although interdicts are an important tool of ensuring the rule of law, their use in industrial relations is often an exercise of power play • Increases the pressure on unions and members to return to work or settle because • Non-compliance constitutes an additional ground for dismissal • Contempt carrying with it the threat of imprisonment or a fine • The indiscriminate use of interdicts threatens the legitimacy of the courts and the law as a whole
Judicial response: interdicts • LRA’s approach • Permissible to interdict unprotected strikes • Notice has to be served on the union • As the number of illegal strikes have increased, so has the resort to urgent interdicts • Courts should be aware of the effect of an interdict particularly a temporary interdict on the power dynamics
Judicial response: contempt • Ram Transport v SATAWU and others • Commission of criminal acts and other strike related misconduct in breach of an order of court will be subject to the ‘severest penalties’ the court can impose • Security Services Employers Organisation v SATAWU and others • Disobedience of court order inimical to the foundational values of the Constitution
Judicial response: compensation • Committee on Freedom of Association • No penalty for a legitimate peaceful strike • Compensation must be proportional • LRA’s approach • Compensation taking into account • Attempts to comply • Whether premeditated • Whether in response to unjustified conduct of the employer • Compliance with interdict • Interests of orderly collective bargaining • Duration of the strike • Financial position of employer, union and employees
Judicial response: compensation • Rustenberg Platinum Mines v Mouthpiece Workers Union • 15 million lost profits - R100 000 compensation ordered • Algoa Bus Company v SATAWU • R460 000 loss – R100 000 compensation ordered against employees who participated
Judicial response: delictual damages • LRA’s approach • Protected strike and conduct in furtherance of a protected strike is not a delict or breach of contract • Does not apply to conduct which constitutes an offence • Mondi v CEPPWAWU • Confirms that labour court can hear a delictual claim