1 / 17

Stormwater Study

Stormwater Study. To determine the effectiveness of the campus ’ existing stormwater infrastructure, if NSCC qualifies for a stormwater credit and to propose future measures that will enable NSCC to save money and the environment. Hunter Brown, Laura McFarlane, Krasimira Pesheva.

osborn
Download Presentation

Stormwater Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Stormwater Study • To determine the effectiveness of the campus’ existing stormwater infrastructure, if NSCC qualifies for a stormwater credit and to propose future measures that will enable NSCC to save money and the environment. Hunter Brown, Laura McFarlane, Krasimira Pesheva

  2. NSCC pays $80,000.00/yr in Stormwater/drainage fees. Photo courtesy of City of Seattle, www.seattle.gov Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) has a Stormwater Facility Credit Program wherein NSCC can receive a credit for up to 50% off of their annual bill by managing all of its stormwater onsite.

  3. Currently, NSCC has a number of rain gardens, greenbelts and retention areas built to manage and slow the flow of water off of its impermeable surfaces. Photo by Hunter Brown Photo by Hunter Brown Photo by Hunter Brown

  4. Our goal was to determine the infiltration rate of the retention pond for the stormwater runoff from the south east parking lot in order to determine the ponds management capabilities. Image by Hunter Brown

  5. To calculate the infiltration rate we used the Falling Head Percolation Test Procedure from the King County Surface Water Design Manual. As per the County’s instructions we dug 3 test pits, evenly distributed within the basin of the retention area. Image by Hunter Brown

  6. The test pits were dug down to the depth of the most limiting soil horizon beneath the surface which was glacial till; dense clay inundated with rocks. Photo by Hunter Brown The glacial till is located 1-4 inches below the top soil. Photo by Hunter Brown

  7. The test pits ranged in depth from between 12 and 18 inches below the surface. Photo by Hunter Brown A 6 inch diameter pipe, 12 inches in length, was used in each test pit to maintain a consistent surface area and volume for calculating the infiltration rate. Photo by Hunter Brown

  8. Because the limiting horizon was glacial till, we saturated each test pit with water for 23 continuous hours prior to running our test. Photo by Hunter Brown Photo by Hunter Brown

  9. Measurements were taken at 30 minute intervals until the drop in water did not vary by more than a 1/16th of an inch for two successive water level drops within a 90 minute time period. Table by Hunter Brown

  10. The Percolation Rate for each test pit was calculated by dividing the time interval used between measurements (30 min) by the magnitude of the last water level drop (our final measurement, 150-180 min). Table by Hunter Brown The percolation rates of the three test pits vary by more than 20 minutes/inch, thus they cannot be averaged and we are unable to determine the actual infiltration rate of the retention pond.

  11. In the process of conducting our test it was discovered that the retention pond was connected to a catch basin as a fail safe in the event of overflow. The benefit of this is that a further study of the retention ponds infiltration rate can now be done on a large scale by utilizing water flow meters. Meters should be placed at both of the inlet pipes as well as at the outlet pipe where it drains into the catch basin. This study should also utilize information from the on campus weather station in order to quantify and determine the effectiveness of the retention pond and compare the expected input with the measured input. The study should take place throughout fall, winter and spring. Further research must also be done to determine all of the sources flowing into the retention pond. While it may be safe to assume that only the Outfall drains feed the pond it is possible that one or more the catch basins to the south may also flow into the pond. Figure Modified by Hunter Brown

  12. Photo courtesy of Seattle Daily Photo, www.seattle-daily-photo-blogspot.com The vast majority of the permeable surfaces on campus sit on glacial till which isn’t very permeable. However, over the 2011-2012 school year geologist John Figge and his class will be taking core samples of the soil and mapping them on a campus grid. Working with his results NSCC should be able to determine which, if any, of the additional proposed future studies and/or projects on the following pages will be worth exploring.

  13. Secondary south eastern parking lot. The photograph on the right was taken from the north end of this parking lot, facing south. As shown in the photo this parking lot has a substantial grade. Ergo, it would be relatively easy and inexpensive to install a series of asphalt berms approximately 1-1/2 inches tall and 3 inches in width along the length of the parking lot to guide the storm water into a series rain gardens, that would also need to be constructed, to the west. Image by Hunter Brown

  14. Converting the existing lawns: To the south of the DSHS and College Center buildings are thousands of square feet of lawn that could easily be converted into rain gardens capable of handling most or all of the rain fall landing on these buildings. The most difficult aspect of this project would be how to divert the water into the gardens. This is something that NSCC should keep in mind for all of its future building projects. Photo by Hunter Brown

  15. Triangle in need of curb cutouts: If future studies revel that the south eastern retention pond is not effectively managing all of the stormwater coming off of the southeastern parking lot then some of the storm water should be diverted to the triangle to the west. This could be accomplished by cutting out sections of the existing curb surrounding the area on the east and southwest sides as well as by creating a larger berm on the western corner. Image modified by Hunter Brown

  16. Northeastern Triangle: This area was engineered to manage the stormwater coming off of both the buildings and the parking lots to the southwest. While we do know that this retention are works, because it has never overflowed, we do not yet know how much storm water it is managing and how much is going into the cities stormwater system. A study of this area utilizing water meters and data from the weather station through fall, winter and spring will be necessary. Image modified by Hunter Brown

  17. Finally, there are also several other areas in and around the various parking lots that could easily have small rain gardens retro fitted into place however their effectiveness would pale in comparison to the previously mentioned suggestions. Additionally, it is our recommendation that all research, work and labour be performed by students at the college to reduce expenses while simultaneously providing hands on experience for the students.

More Related