Please could you sit with people who are NOT from the same School or Service as you. Thanks

1. Please could you sit with people who are NOT from the same School or Service as you. Thanks

2. English Language Requirements What should Exeter be asking for? Chris Longman (HuSS and Education Enhancement)

3. Session overview • Do we have a problem? What issues are there for students and staff regarding language competence? • How do we evaluate the language competence of international applicants? • How does Exeter compare with our peer competitors? • If we raise our requirements, what will the consequences be? • What possible recommendations can we make regarding English language requirements at Exeter?

4. Do we have a problem? In pairs / small groups, discuss the experiences you have had with international students whose first language is not English. In terms of their linguistic competence… • How do the int’l students themselves cope? • What issues do you as educationalists have? • How do ‘home’ students react to and interact with international students in class? 5 minutes

5. Do we have a problem? Comments by international students whose first language is not English: • Time • Difficulties in expressing views • Comprehension • Concentration • Confidence & demotivation • Perception that the University is dishonest

6. Do we have a problem? Comments from staff • Adjustment for linguistically challenged students creates perception of dumbing down • Management of small group discussion problematic • Interpreting questions and comments in class often difficult • Marking often takes much longer and is problematic when meaning is obscured by poor English

7. Do we have a problem? Comments from home students (from undergraduate and PGT surveys) • Difficulties with comprehension of international students, esp. in small groups often leading to poor class dynamics • Perception that University chasing international fee-paying students and is prepared to sacrifice quality of applicants for financial reasons

8. Quality Review Working Party QRWP survey analysis from PGT survey “[I]t was felt that international students with poor language skills were unable to participate adequately and that this impacted on the learning and assessment of others.”

9. How do we evaluate the English language competence of our applicants? • International English Language Testing System (IELTS) • Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) • INTO internal testing • + others

10. IELTS • 2 types of test – one designed for university entrance, one for vocational use • Tests 4 skills • 2 ½ hours, • Including face-to-face interview, and • 2 writing tasks 150 words and 250 words • 9 point band scale • 1 = non-user • 9 = expert user

11. IELTS (cont.)

12. What does IELTS say? IELTS Guide for Educational Institutions 2009

13. Prof. David Ingram “As one of the people who developed the original specifications for the various IELTS levels, my own advice has always been that the minimum desirable level for students entering academic programs is an overall band score of 7.” http://www.abc.net.au/rn/arts/ling/stories/s1404921.htm

14. What does Exeter require? UG, PGT and PGR (most programmes) • 6.5and no less than 6.0 in the writing section and no less than 5.0 in any other section • Some programmes ask for more (eg MBA and MA English Studies – IELTS 7.0) • Some programmes ask for less (eg programmes in some sciences ask for overall 6.0)

15. What do top universities require?

16. What do our top-10 competitors require?(main focus: Humanities and Social Sciences)

17. What do our top-10 competitors require?

18. So how does Exeter compare? Exeter appears to have the least stringent requirements. It is certainly not as demanding as the majority of our competitors who … • Usually differentiate between UG and PG • Ask for minimum of 6.0 in all components if the overall requirement is 6.5 • Frequently ask for 7.0 in linguistically more demanding programmes

19. So why don’t we raise our requirements? • After all, we are raising our academic requirements for all our students, and … • We are raising our game across the board in terms of research, teaching and professional support to be considered an internationally recognised, UK Top-10 university • So, in pairs / small groups, quickly discuss what reasons we have for not changing

20. Final comments before voting • Are we being honest? • Setting our students up to struggle • Pressure on academic and support staff • Alienating home students from our internationalisation agenda • Jeopardising the integration of all our students

21. We should reconsider our current English language requirements • Strongly Agree • Agree • Neutral • Disagree • Strongly Disagree

22. Possible recommendations • Status quo • Small rise in University requirements (eg 6.5 with min. of 6.0 in all components • Greater rise (eg from 6.5 to 7.0)

23. At what University level should we act? • At individual programme level • At College level • At University level • Common University level, but with option for individual programmes to opt-out

24. Which academic levels should we change, if any? • Neither UG nor PG • Leave UG as it is but raise PG requirements • Raise both UG and PG • Leave UG and PGT as they are but raise PGR requirements

25. Should the University offer to pay for all Int’l sts whose first language is not English to do a month’s pre-sessional at INTO? • No • Yes, but only if they already meet the university's minimum language requirements  • Yes, irrespective of whether they meet the university's minimum requirements  

26. Thank you for listening and participating