400 likes | 517 Views
Getting Your Students Speaking. Harnessing the power of blended learning and new technologies. Giving Students A Voice. From Input To Uptake. Online Resources. What’s On Tap. Potential Why get students speaking online? Types of delivery options Best practices
E N D
Getting Your Students Speaking Harnessing the power of blended learning and new technologies Giving Students A Voice From Input To Uptake
Online Resources
What’s On Tap • Potential • Why get students speaking online? • Types of delivery options • Best practices • Blended ideas / activities • Websites / Tools • Q and A Overview
New Possibilities What If?
Why? Why the need for students to speak online? Rationale
Merrill Swain • Output reinforces fluency by • Practice • Noticing + CF • Hypothesizing • Habituation Rationale
More Reasons Motivation Repetition Feedback / Monitoring Evaluation Self Directed Learning Efficacy / Fairness Low Affective Filter Rationale
What options are available? What types of blended learning can teachers implement? Options
What options are available? Synchronous Asynchronous Options
What options are available? Audio / Video Video only Audio only Websites Devices Lab / Class / Home Options
Standards What is the Gold standard? Best Practices
Standards Make it official Give Ss choice Demo in class Provide a model Hardware Set standards Best Practices
Lesson Planning How can teachers make this part of their online learning? Activities & Ideas
Lesson Planning Performances / Role plays Record the Textbook Reading for the class Picture Prompts / Response Mimicking | Singing Skype in the Classroom Opinions / Presentations Student Feedback Activities & Ideas
Online Resources
EnglishCentral Top 3
Voicethread Top 3
Voxopop Top 3
Bubblejoy Video Postcards
Eyejot Video email
Audioboo Audio Only
Chirbit Audio Sharing
Evoca Audio Drop Box
Vocaroo No Frills Audio
Fotobabble Speaking Photos
Mailvu Video Email
Intervue Video Convo
Lingt LMS Courses
Present.me Flipped Curriculum
Screenr Website
SingSnap Songs Singing
Woices Location Based
Wetoku Duo Interviews
Scribblar Real Time Whiteboard
Skype in the Classroom Record! Real Time Convo
Tutorials PD
Further Thoughts Discussion Q and A on technology Let’s Talk
http://eltandtech.pbworks.com ddeubel@gmail.com http://bit.ly/h4geqP Contact More....
Further Reading Brown, Jeremy, Noticing: Is it a valid concept? TESL-EJ, 2002 Heift, Trude, Corrective Feedback and learner uptake in CALL, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004. Long, M.H., Problems in SLA, 2006 Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63–90. Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Paninos, D., & Linnell, J. (1996). Language learners’ interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of language learners? TESOL Quarterly, 30, 59–84. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Research
Further Reading Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 137-174). Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). New York: Routledge. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371–391. Taddarth, Assma, Recasts, Uptakes and Learning: Effects and Relationships. 2010 References