461 likes | 746 Views
NIEeS Workshop Cambridge 3-4 April 2003. Discontinuous Modelling of Structural Masonry and Quasi Brittle Media. N. Bi ć ani ć , C. J. Pearce C. Stirling, C. Davie Computational Mechanics Group Department of Civil Engineering University of Glasgow.
E N D
NIEeS Workshop Cambridge 3-4 April 2003 Discontinuous Modelling of Structural Masonry and Quasi Brittle Media N. Bićanić, C. J. Pearce C. Stirling, C. Davie Computational Mechanics Group Department of Civil Engineering University of Glasgow
Scale of Discontinuties – Macro/Meso/Micro etc Scale of Observation Multi-Scale, Homogenisation Material Heterogenity Continuum Physics RV - Representative Volume
Discontinuous Modelling • of Structural Masonry • (macro discontinuities- existing • and emerging - fracturing associated • with an internal length scale) • Flow through Jointed Rock • (multifield, existing discontinuities) • Lattice Modelling of • Hydraulic Fracturing • (emerging macro discontinuities, • softening, internal length scale)
Structural and Historic Masonry Computational Failure Predictions Nonlinear FE Analysis, including Interface Elements DDA Analysis, with Simply Deformable Blocks. Interface Failure DEM Analysis -Rigid Disk Particles -Spring and Cluster Model
Discontinuous Modelling of Masonry FE + Joint (Interface) Elements DEM + Interface Law DDA + Interface Law Block Spring Interface – Fracture Energy Controlled Softening Block Deformability (Low, High, Arbitrary) Block Fracturing (Through Block) Contact Detection (Search Algorithms) Contact Kinematics, Contact Kinetics
3D Block Spring Model Li, Vance
Discrete Cracking of Masonry Walls (Alfaiate, de Almeida) FE with Multi-Surface Plasticity for Interface -u Fracture Energy Control Masonry Units Elastic
Rigid or deformable blocks Linear and non-linear force-displacement for discontinuities Library of material models for deformable blocks and for discontinuities Lemos 3DEC large displacements (slip and opening) along distinct surfaces in a discontinuous medium
Benchmarks - Masonry Walls on Inclined Plane Pagnoni, Nistico DECICE
Block Deformability Representation Discontinuous Deformation Analysis DDA Lowest order DDA, constant stress field per block of arbitrary shape
Contact Constraints Penalty Format Lagrangian Augmented Lagrangian Mohr Coulomb with Tension Cut-Off
Time Stepping Scheme Dynamic Relaxation Solver Shi (DDA) Newmark Implicit, unconditionally stable scheme
Poor stress representation for Low Order DDA Improvements Block FE Submeshing Block Fracturing Rock Bolts Higher Order DDA Numerical Manifold DDA recast as a special case of Numerical Manifold, Partition of Unity Method
Manifold Method, Partition of Unity Simplex Integration
Masonry Arch Influence of Backfill on the Collapse Load Hinge Hinge Hinge Hinge DDA Analysis of Edinburgh Arch Bridge (φ = 200 – Failure Mode at 31.8kN/m)
φ =20o φ =28o φ =36o 0.8 Pfail 17 kN/m 1.0 Pfail 21 kN/m 1.20 Pfail 25.5 kN/m 1.50 Pfail 31.8 kN/m
Contact Predictor/corrector Steps INITIAL GEOMETRY At start of time step blocks are not in contact. PREDICTOR STEP Displacements of blocks are calculated for current time step. Overlaps are used to detect possible contacts and the nature of pre-existing contacts. CORRECTOR STEP Stiff springs are placed between blocks in contact and friction forces applied to satisfy interface criteria. Multiple contact predictor-corrector steps may be required to determine location and nature of all contacts in a complex system. These are the iterations in DDA.
Contact Predictor StepCalculating the Location of a Contact Inaccurate calculation of point of contact Pc. Can lead to solution oscillations and convergence problems. Traditional Approach (Shi, Jing) More Accurate Approach • Calculate the location of the contact point Pc at the exact time it occurred. • More accurate calculation of contact location results in faster convergence and reduces solution oscillations.
Emerging Failure Mode Identification from the Eigenvalue Analysis of the Linearised K
Changes in Fundamental Eigenvector identifying the eventual failure mode
Modal Decomposition of Incremental Deformation Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 l1 =3.72e3 a1=26.5 l1 =3.44e3 a1=45.8 l1 =0.0 a1=39.6 l2 =7.35e3 a2=47.9 l2 =7.23e3 a2=28.3 l2 =0.0 a2=36.8 l3 =1.90e4 a3=5.6 l3 =9.32e3 a3=9.2 l3 =0.0 a3=23.5 l4 =2.56e4 a4=6.5 l4 =1.89e4 a4=5.6 l4 =8.52e3 a4=0.0
Four Hinges Arch Bridge Failure Bridgemill Arch Bridge – DDA model
Caledonian Canal (Telford) Fort Augustus Wall Collapse and Major Repair • Scottish Lighthouses 3D interlocking stones • Fractured Mudrock Seals
DDA, Keyblock Theory Modelling of Discontinuous Rock Mass HYDRO-DDA Flow through Fractured Media Fractured Mudrock Seals Hydraulic Fracturing
HYDRO (fixed mesh) HYDRO-DDA Interface HYDRO-DDA interface DDA Pressure Equivalent porosity
Fixed fluid mesh DDA Mesh Configuration of discontinuities in solid domain Finite Element Mesh Densification along discontinuities
Permeability mapping Simple permeability mapping , Directly proportional to equivalent porosity The essential behaviour can often be expressed successfully using the simple Kozeny-Carman Relation (through-going pipes) Equivalent porosity
Staggered Approach between Solids & Fluid Domains DDDDA parallels Fluid flow calculation Permeability mapping Transform pressures into Nodal forces Fw(n) DDA mesh Fluid boundary conditions New permeability mapping New fluid flow calculation Transform pressures into Nodal forces Fw(n+1) New DDA calculation New DDA calculation
Model Problem - SHEAR Changes in Flow Pattern though Fractured Seal Layer as a Result of Blocks Movement and Deformation (Changes in Mechanical Boundary Conditions)
Steady State Fluid Fluxes and Effective Permeability for Different Overpressures Effective Permeability for Problems A and B
Hydraulic Fracturing • Viscous fluid flow in the fracture • Leak off of fluid to the rock matrix • Elastic/plastic deformation of rock • Fracture propagation • Proppant transport
Well Bore Stability Horizontal cross-section Hydraulic Fracture Vertical cross-section Lattice Modelling of Continua
Plane Strain Equations Griffiths and Mustoe Lattice Models for Elastic Continua
Viscous fluid flow in the fracture (PFM - Particle Fluid Model) • Leak off of fluid to the rock matrix • Elastic/plastic deformation of rock (PSM Particle Solid Model, Lattice, Softening Plasticity, Fracture Criterion) • Fracture propagation • Proppant transport (Distinct Particles)
Benchmark Problems Lattice Fracture E = 1785MPa n = 0.25Gf = 200.0N/m ft = 0.5MPa lattice size h = 0.5, 0.25, 0.1m Es = f(E, Gf, ft, h)
PSM+PFM PSM+Proppant Particles
Conclusions • Micro vs Macro • Discontinuous Modelling of Masonry • Multi-Physics – Flow through Discontinua • Lattice Modelling for Hydraulic Fracturing