1 / 12

T1008 status

T1008 status. W.Baldini for the SuperB -IFR Group. R&D for the SuperB Instrumented Flux Return. Muon Identification E< 5GeV Superconducting solenoid F lux R eturn I nstrumented with active material

Download Presentation

T1008 status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. T1008 status W.Baldini for the SuperB-IFR Group

  2. R&D for the SuperB Instrumented Flux Return • Muon Identification E< 5GeV • Superconducting solenoid Flux Return Instrumented with active material • Plastic scintillator bars readout through WLS fibers and Silicon Photo-Multipliers (SiPM) • Baseline layout to be tested on beam with a prototype • TDR to be written in spring…

  3. The IFR Baseline Detection Technique • Magnet Flux Return instrumented to detect Muons and KL • BaBar-like detector with hexagonal barrel and two encaps • Plan to re-use BaBar IFR structure, adding iron to improve μ-ID • Scintillator as active material to cope with higher flux of particles • Minos-like scintillator bars readout through WLS fibers and Silicon Photo-Multipliers • 8-9 active • layers Endcap Barrel μ

  4. The Prototype Iron Active Layers (Pizza Boxes) Prototype • Iron: 60x60x92 cm3, 9 slots for the active layers • up to 9 active layers readout together • 4 Time Readout (TDC-RO) “standard “ • 4 Binary Readout (BiRo) “standard” • 4 special modules to study different • fibers or SiPM geometry Active Layer (“pizza box”)

  5. Summary of activities • Installation: March 1-4 • Security walkthrough: March 5, first beam: March 3 • Trigger timing and apparatus setting up • Data taking summary: • 8,6,5 GeV • Cherenkov scan • Muons: • Selected with Cherenkov (C1) • Selected with downstream scintillators (S3 and S4) • Pions • Selected with Cherenkov (C1) • Control triggers • No Cherenkov • Only Electrons (C2) veto • Still 16 hours of beam (until 6 am)

  6. Cherenkov scans • For us is of fundamental importance to collect clean samples of muons and pions • very important to understand how well the cherenkov tags the particles • scan needed for each beam momentum: 8,6,5 GeV/c

  7. Cherenkov pressure scan: 8 GeV (N2) July-11 scan Pion peak Muon peak March-12 scan

  8. Cherenkov pressure scan: 6 GeV (N2) July-11 scan March-12 scan

  9. Cherenkov pressure scan: 5GeV March-12 scan

  10. Event samples… Hit channel time (samples of of 12.5 nsec) Detector hit map for a sample of Muons at 8 GeV

  11. Event samples… Hit channel time (samples of of 12.5 nsec) Detector hit map for a sample of Pions at 8 GeV

  12. Summarizing….. • We have taken data at 8,6,5, GeV • Now the Cherenkov seems to be more efficient at 6 and 5 GeV than in October (something happened in the meanwhile?) • 24h running since Friday • Apart from a few interruption at the beginning (March 6-th) the beam was very stable • We plan to take data until tomorrow morning (8am?) then move the equipment out of the area

More Related