1 / 34

Technion

Israel Institute of Technology. Technion. Faculty of Electrical Engineering. Project A 044167. Summer 2001. 3D Geometric Objects Search. Project team: Lyakas Alexander 307666883 Instructor: Dr. Sigal Ar. • Given a collection (database) of objects.

patty
Download Presentation

Technion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Israel Institute of Technology Technion Faculty of Electrical Engineering Project A 044167 Summer 2001

  2. 3D Geometric Objects Search • Project team: • Lyakas Alexander 307666883 • Instructor: Dr. Sigal Ar

  3. • Given a collection (database) of objects • Choose a search object • Find objects that are similar to the search object • The search is iterative and interactive • A user marks some objects as ‘GOOD’ or ‘BAD’ • The search program tries to refine the search by considering the user’s feedback The Main Idea

  4. The Main Idea – Cont.

  5. An Example

  6. An Example – Cont.

  7. Starting the Project • The following components available from Iterative and Interactive Search for Objects by Moty Golan & Oren Kerem based on Similarity Between Three-Dimensional Objects – An Iterative and Interactive Approach by Michael Elad, Ayellet Tal, Sigal Ar. • Two databases: 3D colorless models & 2D images • A search program

  8. Project Requirements • Test the approach with 3D colored models • Improve the search program • Design & perform system tests with real users

  9. Project Requirements - Cont. • Build a database of 3D colored models • Gather 3D colored objects from the WWW • Perform preprocessing calculations, i.e. present each object in a way that will enable searching

  10. Project Requirements - Cont. • Improve the search program • Adding a new database must not influence the search program’s code • Add features needed for testing

  11. Project Requirements - Cont. • Test the system with real users • Design the tests • Perform tests with volunteers • Draw conclusions

  12. • To calculate feature vectors we used moments of different orders on • colored points in 3D • colored normals in 3D • colorless points in 3D • colorless normals in 3D Working with Objects • Each object is presented as a numerical vector, AKA ‘feature vector’

  13. • Consider two objects represented as feature vectors: • We can compare them using the (square of) standard Euclidean distance: • By adding weights and a bias value we can refine the distance function: Comparing Objects

  14. Data Preprocessing • Convert the objects to the format convenient to be sampled • Perform sampling • Correct normals directions • Normalize rotation and scale • Create icons for all objects • Calculate features vectors

  15. • The sampling workflow: • Choose a triangle to sample Sampling • Before sampling each object is presented as colored triangular mesh Ensure uniform sampling • Sample a point, normal and color from the chosen triangle • Do this as many times as needed (10,000 in our case)

  16. • The pqr-th moment (of a 3D object) is defined as: • We approximate moments as: • Feature vector of level 3 in ‘colorless 3D’ look like: Calculating features • The order of the moment is p+q+r

  17. • The object-based solution introduces the DBLINK class • Database-specific information is stored inside DBLINK objects only • One DBLINK object for each database – stored on disk The Search Program • The extendibility requirement – adding new database must not influence the search program code

  18. The Search Program – Cont.

  19. • Automatic Screen Shooting • Before search refinements – with user’s ‘GOOD/BAD’ markings • When the new results are displayed Saving Test Sessions Results • Manual Screen Shooting

  20. Testing the system • Several volunteers that had no previous knowledge about how the system works • Tests were done for several test objects • For each test object – all search configurations were tried • The testers gave feedback on the search results

  21. Test Example 1

  22. Test Example 1 - Cont.

  23. Test Example 1 - Cont.

  24. Test Example 1 - Cont.

  25. Test Example 1 - Cont.

  26. Test Example 1 - Cont.

  27. Test Example 2 - Cont.

  28. Test Example 2 - Cont.

  29. Test Example 2 - Cont.

  30. Test Example 2 - Cont.

  31. Test Example 2 - Cont.

  32. Testing Results Example

  33. • In most cases the search converged • not always with good search results… • ‘Normals’, level 4 worked good • but slow… • So should the colors be considered? • … Conclusions • Searching for objects having a ‘family’ was successful with most configurations • No search configuration worked well for all objects

  34. The End • See the project book for many skipped details

More Related