1 / 1

Effect of Stress and Glucose on Self-Control Mary Redding and H. Anna Han, PhD

Effect of Stress and Glucose on Self-Control Mary Redding and H. Anna Han, PhD Department of Psychology, St. Mary’s College of Maryland. Results. Introduction. Self-control is the effortful process of refraining from behaviors that may be initially rewarding, but have long-term costs. 1,2,6

paytah
Download Presentation

Effect of Stress and Glucose on Self-Control Mary Redding and H. Anna Han, PhD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effect of Stress and Glucose on Self-Control Mary Redding and H. Anna Han, PhD Department of Psychology, St. Mary’s College of Maryland Results Introduction • Self-control is the effortful process of refraining from behaviors that may be initially rewarding, but have long-term costs.1,2,6 • Ego Depletion explains that a person’s self-control depends on a limited cognitive resource, which can be depleted after use. 1,2,3,4,6 • Stress is a factor that can contribute to self-control failures by consuming the resource required for self-control. 5,6 • Controlled mental processes (such as self-control) require more glucose than automatic processes.3 • Specifically, an increase in blood glucose levels resulted in fewer self-control errors after an initial ego depletion task. 3,4 • Present Research • Further examined the depleting effect of stress as well as the attenuating role of glucose on self-control. • 2 (stress/no stress) x 2 (glucose/ no glucose) design • Reaction times (RT) on the Stroop task was calculated by subtracting the average RT on the congruent trials from the incongruent. • ANOVA showed there was no main effect of stress on self-control F < 1, nor main effect of glucose on self-control, F < 1. Moreover, there was no interaction between stress and glucose F < 1. • By removing the outliers (data with z-scores >4 and <-4) from the data set (n=53), there was no significant main effect of either stress on self-control, F < 1, or glucose on self-control, F < 1. Hypotheses • Participants under stress would have worse self-control performance (slower Stroop RT) compared to those not under stress. • Participants who receive sugar will have better self-control performance (faster Stroop RT) than those who do not. • Stress + no sugar=worst self-control • No stress + sugar= best self-control. Methods • Participants • 58 (45 female, 13 male) students from St. Mary’s College of Maryland. • Students were excluded from participation if they had medical conditions related to sugar or sugar substitutes, such as diabetes. • Procedures • Participants randomly assigned a condition by session. • Participants in the stressful conditions had 4 minutes to complete a solvable anagram task5, while those in the non-stressful conditions had 15 minutes to complete the same task. • After competing the anagrams, the participants in the glucose conditions received regular “Life Savers” brand candy with sugar, and those in the no glucose conditions received sugar-free version. • While participants ate the piece of candy, all participants answered 3 filler questionnaires (were not analyzed) which on average took about 10 minutes (the time to metabolize the sugar). • Self-control was measured by reaction times (RT) on a computerized Stroop task, which randomly presented 16 congruent trials and 16 incongruent trials of a color/word pairing to the participants. • At the end of the study, participants answered the questions from the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale. Conclusions • Results failed to support previous research that stress has detrimental effects on self-control and that glucose would have attenuating effects on self-control. • Limitations • Anagram task as a stress-inducer: The anagrams may have been equally stressful because both stressed and non-stressed conditions had relatively high perceived stress scale scores which were not significantly different between the two conditions. • Form of glucose: One piece of candy may not have been enough to produce an effect (previous studies used 8-oz. glass of sugar water). Also, it may take more than 10 minutes to metabolize the sugar. • Measure of self-control: The Stroop task is normally used in cognitive studies on selective attention, cognitive flexibility or processing speed, for example. • Future Research: • Continue to use anagrams to induce stress, but have a control condition where participants are acclimated to the lab setting and/or an activity that does not require controlled mental processing (i.e. reading a magazine). • Use a larger or more efficient amount of sugar than the one piece of Life Savers’ candy. * References • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351-355. • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265. • Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., et al. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336. • Masicampo, E. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2008). Toward a physiology of dual-process reasoning and judgment: Lemonade, willpower, and expensive rule-based analysis. Psychological Science, 19(3), 255-260. • Mayzner, M. S., & Tresselt, M. E. (1966). Anagram solution times: A function of multiple-solution anagrams. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 66-73. • Oaten, M., & Cheng, K. (2005). Academic examination stress impairs self-control. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(2), 254-279. • Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Longitudinal study of procrastination, performance, stress, and health: The costs and benefits of dawdling. Psychological Science, 8, 454-45. Acknowledgements Special thanks to Dr. Anna H. Han and Angela Draheim for all their help and support.

More Related