80 likes | 100 Views
Slow Wires, Hot Chips, and Leaky Transistors: New Challenges in the New Millenium. Norm Jouppi Compaq - WRL. Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are the views of Norm and are not statements by Compaq Computer Corporation. Slow Wires. Wires have been slow before (Cray’s computers)
E N D
Slow Wires, Hot Chips, and Leaky Transistors: New Challenges in the New Millenium Norm Jouppi Compaq - WRL Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are the views of Norm and are not statements by Compaq Computer Corporation
Slow Wires • Wires have been slow before (Cray’s computers) • It is not the end of the world • Cray-1 core < 1.5M transistors • Designers need to pay attention • Machine architecture is affected • Opportunity for innovation: • CMP makes more sense • Formerly slow inter-chip MP communication gets faster
Hot Chips • Chips have been hot before • E.g., 115W BIPS-0 • It is not the end of the world • Designers need to pay attention • Opportunity for innovation: • Low-power computing (i.e., running off a battery) will not scale well • Now pick only 1 (instead of 2) out of 3: • More function • Lower power • Higher clock speed
Background: Leaky MOS Transistors • Two types of leakages • Subthreshold conduction • Leakage between source and drain • Like having a dimmer light switch • Carver Mead has been exploiting for years • Many possible ways to “fix”: SOI, low temp, … • Gate oxide leakage • Leakage between gate and source or drain • Like having a “hot” light switch handle • Over last 25 years, Tox = Le / 45 • Tox = 2.1nm for 0.10um process • Alternative gate dielectrics?
Prognosis: Leaky Transistors • Transistors have been leaky before (BJTs) • It is not the end of the world • Designers need to pay attention • Opportunity for innovation: • New CAD tools at the circuit level • Need separate gate processing for memory core • Traditional memory may not scale as well • Exacerbates the power problem
Real Problem: Design Complexity • Design team size > 250 people for flagship uP • Design team growing 1/feature size • Designs take longer and have fewer changes • Hennessy’s verification to design team ratio • ROI negative: • 200people x 3years x 167K$/personyear = 100M$ • NRE/unit = 1K$ for 100,000 units • “Consolidation” has been and will continue • In the number of architectures • In the number of distinct designs
Increasing NRE - Example: Mask Cost • A mask set used to cost less than $25K • EUV mask sets may cost >1M$ • Raises barrier to implementation in latest tech • Standard uP: flagship, DSP, embedded • Standard RAM: DRAM, Non-Vol, SRAM? • FPGA’s • ? ASICs • SOC • Custom-fit • ? VLSI project chips via maskless tech
Summary • + Lots of opportunities for research • - ROIC (human, $) for implementation decreasing • More and more things will be technically feasible but economically unjustifiable