210 likes | 312 Views
Michigan Charter School Meeting. How a Sound E-Rate Strategy Can Help Fund and Build 21 st Century Learning Environments April 16, 2007. Intelagent Resources. Founded in 2003 by Remy Bibaud B.S., M.S.
E N D
Michigan Charter School Meeting How a Sound E-Rate Strategy Can Help Fund and Build 21st Century Learning Environments April 16, 2007
Intelagent Resources • Founded in 2003 by Remy Bibaud B.S., M.S. • Provide change management and technology consulting services that create both operational and frontline service level improvements for K20 education, non profit and government clients • Utilize highly qualified subject matter experts (SME’s) to analyze, plan, implement and deploy • Recognized as an emerging leader in strategic technology consulting for education and non profit organizations in Western PA • Pennsylvania certified Women Business Enterprise (WBE)
Clients • Arsenal Family and Children’s Center • Bethlehem Center School District • Boys and Girls Club of Western PA • Butler Area School District • Delaware Valley Charter High School • Diocese of Pittsburgh Catholic Schools • Elizabeth Forward School District • Fox Chapel Area School District • Mon Valley Education Consortium • Moon Area School District • Mt. Lebanon School District • Northside Urban Pathways • Peters Township School District • Pittsburgh Public Schools • Pittsburgh Zoo and PPG Aquarium • Propel Charter Schools • 3 Rivers Connect • tREAT • School District of Philadelphia • Womens Center and Shelter
0 Consulting Services Analysis Deployment Planning Implementation
E Rate Basics • E Rate (Educational Rate) • E Rate is NOT a Grant, it is a Federal program paid for by U.S. consumers Phone Bill: Universal Service Charge= E Rate
E Rate Overview • Provides discounts to E Rate eligible schools and libraries for Telecommunication Services, Internet Access, Internal Connections, and Basic Maintenance • Applicants can be schools, libraries, or consortia, but only eligible recipients of services can receive discounts. Applicants must apply for discounts each year. • Funding is capped at $2.25 billion annually. • Funding Year History 2004: $2,301,688,489.16 committed 2005: $2,040,253,861.30 committed 2006: $1,812,011,867.03 committed to date
E-Rate Eligible Entities • Must meet the statutory definition of elementary or secondary school found in the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. • Must be a non-profit institutional day or residential school, including a public charter school, that provides elementary or secondary education, as determined under state law. • Must not be operating as a for-profit business or have an endowment exceeding $50 million.
Eligible Services Priority 1: Telecommunications Services 1. Local and Long Distance 2. Cell Phone Services 3. Voice, Data, Video 4. Internet Access/Services 5. Web Hosting Priority 2: Internal Connections 1. Internal Connections (switches, hubs, routers, wiring) 2. Basic Maintenance on Internal Connections 3. Wireless Access Points, Wireless Cards 4. % of Distance Education Equipment 5. Consulting Services related to Priority 2 implementation Note: Priority 1 funded first, then Priority 2 funded beginning with neediest applicants (90%, 89%, 88%, etc.)
How is a School’s Rate Determined? If the % of students in your school that qualifies for the National School Lunch Program is… …and you are in an URBAN area, your discount will be… …or if you are in a RURAL area, your discount will be… School’s Priority 1 Rate (90%) School’s Priority 2 Rate (90%)
E-Rate Statistics for MI 2004 Total Funding: $49,978,754.35 2005 Total Funding: $69,723,591.82 2006 Total Funding: $44,174,321.09
Data Accuracy is IMPERATIVE • Your school/district’s F&RL numbers define your E-Rate discount % • E-Rate uses the state’s National Lunch program report to verify your schools discount and accuracy of your % request (Federal TITLE I&II also use this report) • Tips for making sure your numbers are accurate: • Create a streamlined P.R. and Collection process • Dedicate a staff member to these processes • Consider Sibling searches • Positively encourage the return of lunch forms (giveaways, rewards)
Things to AVOID if you are considering E-Rate • Long Term Contracts with telecom vendors (instead go month to month) • Planning construction w/out considering E-Rate for telecom infrastructure • Assigning cabling/phone/telecom vendors w/out competitive bid process • Network hardware acquisitions w/out competitive bid or state/federal contract vehicle
Charter Client A Profile: • Urban Charter School System in Pittsburgh with 5 school sites and 1 central admin • 80, 87 and 90% F&RL Status across school sites • Total prior E Rate funding $26,000+ Goal: To create substantial sustainable funding opportunities that will drive the Charter System’s infrastructure build-out and accelerate infusion of new technologies w/corresponding expanded functionalities. 2006/2007 Year Total Funding Committed to date: Priority 1: $115, 831.80+ (Funds committed 4/26/06) Priority 2: $99,048.76 (Funds committed 1/23/07) TOTAL: $214,880.56+
Charter Client A (cont’d) Goal: To create substantial sustainable funding opportunities that will drive the Charter System’s infrastructure build-out and accelerate infusion of new technologies w/corresponding expanded functionalities. • Construction of 2 new school sites 2007/2008 Year Funding Request: Priority 1: $186,876.10 Priority 2: $257,312.25 TOTAL: $444,188.35
Charter Client B Profile: • Urban Charter High School in Philadelphia with 1 school site • 90% F&RL • Prior E Rate funding $0 Goal: To create substantial sustainable funding opportunities that will drive the Charter school’s infrastructure build-out and accelerate infusion of new technologies w/corresponding expanded functionalities. 2007/2008 Funding Request: Priority 1: $77,576.29 Priority 2: $146,980.41 TOTAL: $224,556.67
Charter Client C Profile: • Urban Charter Middle School and High School in Pittsburgh with 1 school site • 90% F&RL • Prior E Rate funding $0 Goal: To create substantial sustainable funding opportunities that will drive the Charter school’s infrastructure build-out. Focus on Priority 1 ONLY. 2007/2008 Funding Request: Priority 1: $37,649.12 TOTAL: $37,649.12
Planning a Winning Strategy • Identify current infrastructure by site (network equipment, servers, computing devices, and cabling and diagrams or documentation if available) • Determine relevancy to current existing Technology Plan and make provisions for alignment to new initiatives for which E Rate will be leveraged to acquire • Identify available "FAIR-SHARE" funding requirements and any other contributing funding/grants that can be multi-leveraged to accelerate initiative deployment • Discuss immediate and long-term District goals (per budgets, Curriculum, issues, Tech Plans, and obligations) • Identify site-based project liaisons for input and support
How Can we Partner • Charter School Consortia • Service Partner Agreements • Other Ideas?
Additional Information E-Rate http://www.universalservice.org/sl/
THANK YOU Intelagent Resources Contact: Remy Bibaud 412.563.8043 remy@intelagentresources.com