610 likes | 777 Views
55 TH ANNUAL SAMUEL C. HARVEY MEMORIAL LECTURE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION Saturday, October 14, 2006. CAREERS IN CANCER EDUCATION: INFINITE OPPORTUNITIES DURING CHANGING TIMES. Ajit K. Sachdeva, M.D., F.R.C.S.C., F.A.C.S. Director, Division of Education
E N D
55TH ANNUAL SAMUEL C. HARVEY MEMORIAL LECTURE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION Saturday, October 14, 2006 CAREERS IN CANCER EDUCATION: INFINITE OPPORTUNITIES DURING CHANGING TIMES Ajit K. Sachdeva, M.D., F.R.C.S.C., F.A.C.S. Director, Division of Education American College of Surgeons
Samuel C. Harvey, M.D., Ph.B., F.A.C.S. 1886 - 1953
SAMUEL C. HARVEY, M.D., Ph.B., F.A.C.S. • A consummate surgeon, scholar, educator, role model, historian, and philosopher • Chairman, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine for 23 years • President, American Surgical Association; First Chairman, Coordinators of Cancer Teaching • Introduced active learner-centered education (“Yale System”) • Enjoyed a cigar or pipe, a book, and a desire to stay longer in bed!
A CAREER IN CANCER EDUCATION A History of the Future • It is October 2016 • A Surgeon-Educator, Dr. John Smith, has been invited to deliver the 65th Annual Harvey Memorial Lecture at the AACE Meeting in San Diego • Dr. Smith reflects on the past 10 years, that have shaped his career as a cancer educator
2006: A MILIEU OF CHANGE IN CANCER EDUCATION • Unprecedented scientific and technologic advances • Changes in clinical practice • Different roles of physicians and other health care professionals within high performance teams • Intense focus on competence, accountability, and patient safety
2006: A MILIEU OF CHANGE IN CANCER EDUCATION • Impact of new regulations and mandates • Definition of the six core competencies • Restrictions on resident duty hours • Emphasis on increasing efficiencies and documenting outcomes of educational interventions • Change in demographics of the workforce • Advances in medical and health sciences education
THE PARADIGM SHIFT Continuing Medical Education Continuous Professional Development
KEY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TRADITIONAL CME AND CPD CME CPD • • Episodic interventions for • Lifelong learning for group of learners individual learners • • Teacher-centered and • Learner-centered and teacher-driven learner-driven • • Principal focus clinical • Comprehensive in scope • • Lecture formats • Variety of learning commonly used formats and media used • • Mostly conducted in • Conducted in different formal settings venues Sachdeva, Arch Surg, 2005
CYCLE OF PRACTICE-BASED LEARNING AND IMPROVEMENT Identify Area for Improvement Check for Improvement Engage in Learning Apply New Knowledge and Skills to Practice Sachdeva & Blair, Surg Cl N Am, 2004
KEY CONCEPTS IN CPD AND PBLI Key Concepts • Based on specific individual learning needs identified through review of clinical practice and benchmarking data • Ongoing, contextually relevant education • Emphasis on helping clinicians achieve requisite levels of competence and performance and not on punitive measures • Focus on expertise and mastery
NEW DIRECTIONS IN MEDICAL EDUCATION • Learner-centered educational approaches • Experiential teaching and learning methods • Structured clinical skills teaching, learning, and assessment • Structured technical skills teaching, learning, and assessment
ASSESSMENT OF THE CLINICAL SKILLS OF ENTERING SURGICAL RESIDENTS • Model: 18-station OSCE (9 couplets) • Length of SP stations - 15 min. • Length of PN stations - 7 min. • Total testing time - 3.3 hours • Results: Overall reliability = 0.91 • ANOVAs revealed significant variation in individual residents’ clinical skills as assessed by SPs (F = 4.56, p < 0.01), PNs (F = 11.09, p < 0.001), or both (F = 10.9, p < 0.001) Sachdeva et al, Surgery, 1995
ACS OSCE FOR ENTERING SURGICAL RESIDENTS TO ADDRESS PATIENT SAFETY
OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED ASSESSMENT OF TECHNICAL SKILLS (OSATS) • Model: R-1 to R-6 surgical residents (n=48) • 8 bench model simulations Length of each station - 15 min. Total testing time - 2 hours Specific checklists and global ratings completed by surgeons Results: Reliability = 0.78 for checklists and 0.84 for global ratings Construct validity demonstrated Reznick, et al, Am J Surg, 1997
ACS/VA STRUCTURED EDUCATION MODULE TO ADDRESS MANAGEMENT OF ADVERSE SURGICAL EVENTS • Model: R-2 and R-3 surgical residents (n=7) participated in a 3-part exercise involving pre-operative meeting with standardized patient and spouse; intraoperative management of massive hemorrhage from IVC in a bench model simulation; post-operative meeting with the standardized spouse. Debriefings and review of videotaped performance of residents conducted by faculty Brewster, et al, Am J Surg, 2005
ACS/VA STRUCTURED EDUCATION MODULE TO ADDRESS MANAGEMENT OF ADVERSE SURGICAL EVENTS • Results: Residents performed at or above the expected levels; SP ratings higher than faculty ratings (p<0.05); residents found model realistic, challenging, and a beneficial learning experience Brewster, et al, Am J Surg, 2005
SPECTRUM OF SIMULATION IN MEDICAL EDUCATION • Computer-based simulations • Standardized patients • Part-task trainers • High and low fidelity simulators • Virtual reality
POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF SIMULATION IN MEDICAL EDUCATION • Acquisition and maintenance of competence; demonstration of optimum performance; achievement of excellence • Improvement in patient safety and outcomes of surgical care • Increase in the efficiency of educational processes; assurance of educational outcomes • Demonstration of greater accountability to the public and large consumer groups
USE OF HIGH FIDELITY MEDICAL SIMULATORS TO FACILITATE LEARNING Important Considerations • Curriculum integration • Range of difficulty level • Repetitive practice • Feedback • Multiple learning strategies • Clinical variation • Controlled environment • Individualized learning Issenberg, et al, Med Teach, 2005
CURRENT LIMITATIONS IN THE USE OF SIMULATION IN MEDICAL EDUCATION • Prevalence of weak curricula; technology driving the educational opportunities • Insufficient fidelity of simulation for certain procedures • Problems relating to costs, logistics, access • Absence of large-scale research to evaluate the added value of simulation in medical education
ON-LINE CLINICAL INFORMATION Important Considerations • Credibility of source • Relevance • Unlimited access • Speed • Ease of use Bennett, et al, JCEHP, 2004
ON-LINE CONTINUING EDUCATION COURSES Factors that Encourage Participation • Quality of content • Interactivity; case-based formats • Ease of accessibility and use • Convenience in obtaining continuing education credits Casebeer, et al, JCEHP, 2004
OPPORTUNITIES TO ADVANCE CANCER EDUCATION: 2006 - 2016 • Greater focus on CPD and PBLI efforts • Verification and documentation of knowledge and skills following participation in educational programs • Regional support for innovative educational interventions; establishment of learning communities • Enhancement of e-learning programs
OPPORTUNITIES TO ADVANCE CANCER EDUCATION: 2006 - 2016 • Focus on interdisciplinary work • Emphasis on communication skills and professionalism • Need for leadership to catalyze change • Importance of mentorship in career development • Involvement of patients as partners in health care • Pursuit of innovative research to advance the science of cancer education
INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAMWORK IN PATIENT CARE Characteristics of High Reliability Organizations • Hypercomplexity of systems • Task interdependence • Mitigation of the impact of hierarchy • Distributed decision-making • High degree of accountability • Immediate feedback Baker, et al, Health Research and Educ Trust, 2006
INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAMWORK IN PATIENT CARE Team Competencies • Team leadership • Mutual performance monitoring • Mutual support • Adaptability • Shared mental models • Team orientation • Mutual trust Baker, et al, Health Research and Educ Trust, 2006
INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAMWORK IN PATIENT CARE Skill Requirements • Technical expertise • Problem-solving and decision-making skills • Interpersonal skills Katzenback & Smith, Harvard Bus Rev, 2005
INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAMWORK IN PATIENT CARE Special Challenges • Exemplary communication skills and professionalism • Active listening skills • Negotiation and conflict management AAMC ETE Course, 2006
TEAM COMMUNICATION IN THE OPERATING ROOM Key Elements • Situational awareness • Problem identification • Decision-making • Workload distribution • Time management • Conflict resolution Davies, ACTA Anesth Scand, 2005
TRAINING IN INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAMWORK TO ENHANCE PATIENT CARE • Role modeling in real environments • Discussions of care vignettes • Experiential courses • Standardized, immersive experiences with feedback
IMPACT OF EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION ON PATIENT CARE • Delivery of optimum patient care • Promotion of patient safety • Increase in patient compliance • Enhancement of doctor-patient relationship • Reduction of liability risk • Improvement in time efficiencies
STANDARDIZED COMMUNICATION TO ENHANCE PATIENT SAFETY • Situation • Background • Assessment • Recommendation Leonard, et al, Qual Saf Health Care, 2004
BARRIERS TO SAFE PATIENT HAND-OFFS • The physical setting • The social setting • Language barriers • Medium of communication Solet, et al, Acad Med, 2005
U.S. AND CANADIAN PHYSICIANS’ ATTITUDES AND EXPERIENCES REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF ERRORS TO PATIENTS • Involvement in serious error, 55%; minor error, 73%; near-miss, 62% • Support for disclosing serious errors, 98%; minor errors, 78%, near-misses, 35% • 66% agreed that disclosing serious errors would decrease risk of lawsuits • 74% thought disclosing serious errors would be very difficult Gallagher, et al, Arch Int Med, 2006
IMPACT OF EXEMPLARY PROFESSIONALISM ON PATIENT CARE • Ethical practice of medicine • Delivery of optimum patient care • Fulfillment of responsibilities to patients, the public, and society • Enhancement of the doctor-patient relationship
EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS TO ENHANCE COMMUNICATION SKILLS AND PROFESSIONALISM • Behavioral approaches • Cognitive approaches • Social approaches Underlying Principles
• Cope with change • Cope with complexity • Set a direction • Plan and budget • Align people • Organize and staff • Motivate and inspire • Control and problem-solve DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LEADERS AND MANAGERS Leaders Managers Kotter, Harvard Bus Rev, 1998
•“Twice-born” • “Once-born” • Risk-takers • Risk-averse • Imaginative and inspiring • Rational and controlled • Proactive in establishing • Reactive in establishing goals based on desires goals based on necessity DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LEADERS AND MANAGERS Leaders Managers Zaleznik, Harvard Bus Rev, 2004
• Develop fresh approaches • Address problems by to problems, explore new coordinating and options balancing opposing views • Send messages • Send signals • Very comfortable with • Most comfortable solitary activities working with others • Relate to others in intuitive • Work with others in and empathetic ways traditional ways DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LEADERS AND MANAGERS Leaders Managers Zaleznik, Harvard Bus Rev, 2004
CREATING A CULTURE THAT SUPPORTS EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP • Developing and pursuing a clearly defined plan for leadership succession • Using challenging opportunities and specific assignments to develop the skills of individuals with leadership potential • Providing longitudinal educational experiences and mentoring to develop leadership skills • Recognizing and rewarding mentors Kotter, Harvard Bus Rev, 1998
PROGRESSION OF THEEDUCATIONAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEACHER AND LEARNER Didactic Supervisory Collaborative Consultative Magill et al, Med Teach, 1986
CHARACTERISTICS OF A MENTOR • Wise and trusted advisor, listener, counselor and supporter • Encourages reflection • Promotes personal growth and satisfaction • Benefits from greater self-awareness, new insights, and improvement O’Donnell, J Cancer Educ, 1995
KEY FEATURES OF MENTORSHIP • Grounded in a developmental-contextual framework • Long, comprehensive, intense professional relationship • Involves teaching and learning activities; career advancement; personal support • Both mentee and mentor reap great rewards, are transformed in the process • One-on-one; may include multiple mentors Sachdeva, J Cancer Educ, 1996
STAGES OF SUCCESSFUL MENTORSHIP Initiation Cultivation Separation Redefinition Kram, Acad Manag J, 1983
FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT TO IMPLEMENT INNOVATIVE MEDICAL EDUCATION • Offer training in new teaching, learning, and assessment methods • Focus on the effective use of cutting-edge educational technologies • Recognize and reward surgical faculty for their educational accomplishments
RECOGNITION AND REWARDS FOR SURGEON-TEACHERS AND SURGEON-EDUCATORS • Master • Educator Educator Master Teacher Teacher Sachdeva, et al, Acad Med, 1999