340 likes | 895 Views
Cellular Response to DNA Damage - Repair. ENVR 430: Health Effects of Environmental Agents October 9, 2009 John R. Ridpath Rosenau 347 966-6141. DNA Background. DNA encodes all genetic information Original assumption: blue-print for life must be fundamentally stable
E N D
Cellular Response to DNA Damage - Repair ENVR 430: Health Effects of Environmental Agents October 9, 2009 John R. Ridpath Rosenau 347 966-6141
DNA Background • DNA encodes all genetic information • Original assumption: blue-print for life must be fundamentally stable • Physicist Erwin Schrödinger (in his monograph “What is Life”, 1944): suggested changes could occur to the “hereditary code script” • It was known x-rays could break chromosomes • Schrödinger said the lesions could be replaced by “ingenious crossings” with the unharmed chromosome – we now call this DNA repair mechanism homologous recombination • DNA primary structure elucidated in 1953
Terminology Remedial • Mutation – heritable change in sequence of genome • Mutant – organism that carries one or more mutations • Genotype – genetic information organism encodes in its genome • Phenotype – ensemble of observable characteristics of an organism • Mutagen – agent that leads to an increase in the frequency of occurrence of mutations • Mutagenesis – process by which mutations are produced
DNA Damage • Our genome (primary structure of DNA) is continually beset with insults caused by a myriad of agents, both endogenous and exogenous to the cell.
After DNA Damage, then What? Acute Long-Term DNA repair Healthy Cancer Mutation Aging Cell death Degenerative disease Slide courtesy of Brian Pachkowski
Sources of DNA Damage • Endogenous sources • Spontaneous hydrolysis of bond between base and sugar of backbone; 18000 purines (A & G)/cell/day lost • Deamination of cytosine to uracil; 100-500/cell/day • Oxygen radicals (ROS) react with bases; Ex: 8-oxoG, 1000-2000/cell/day • Replication errors; enough errors to be devastating • Methylating agents (Ex: SAM); react with all bases, 1200/cell/day
Sources of DNA Damage • Exogenous sources • Ionizing radiation; radioactives, cosmic rays • Man-made chemicals react with and alter DNA structure and chemistry • UV radiation from sun; fuses adjacent bases (thymine dimers)
DNA Repair • DNA repair “…connote(s) cellular responses to DNA damage that result in the restoration of normal nucleotide (base) sequence and DNA structure…” * * Friedberg, et al., DNA Repair and Mutagenesis, 2nd ed.; ASM Press; Washington, D.C., 2006; p 4.
DNA Repair Pathways Slide courtesy of Brian Pachkowski
Direct Reversal of DNA Damage • Repairs: pyrimidine dimers (UV), methylated bases • How: enzymatic reaction – just changes it back • DNA methyltransferases: proteins that remove methyl groups from bases • Cryptochrome: human enzyme that reverses pyrimidine dimers • Fidelity: Most efficient, most accurate repair – single enzyme, single step • Consequence of failure: • Dimers; interference with replication and transcription • methylated bases; GC → AT transitions, heritable mutations
Direct Reversal of DNA Damage • The proteins MGMT and ABH2 are used to directly remove methyl groups in direct reversal Wyatt and Pittman, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2006, 19, 1580-1594
Mismatch Repair • Repairs: improperly paired nucleotides and insertion/deletion loops during replication • How • searches for signal that identifies newly synthesized strand; template strand contains methylated bases, new strand is not immediately methylated • degrades this strand past mismatch • resynthesizes the excised strand • Consequences of failure: increased susceptibility to cancer, especially hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC)
Me Mismatch Repair 5’ 5’ 5’ 3’ G G G G T GATC GATC GATC GATC CTAG 3’ 5’ 5’ 3’ • Enzyme complex recognizes G:T mismatch in hemimethylated DNA • Excises mismatched nucleotide (T) on unmethylated strand and reinserts correct nucleotide
Base Excision Repair • When thine eye offends thee … • Repairs • oxidized/reduced bases (Ex: 8-oxoG, 1000- 2000/cell/day) • alkylated bases • deaminated bases • mismatched bases (replication errors) • missing bases [apurinic, apyrimidinic (AP) sites] • How: removes offending base and replaces with correct base • Fidelity: excellent
Base Excision Repair • Consequences of failure • Base substitution → transitions, transversions → point mutations • AP sites • Single strand breaks that may lead to double strand breaks
Base Excision Repair Short patch Long patch Adapted from Sancar, et al., Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004. 73:39-85
Nucleotide Excision Repair • Repairs: cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD), bulky adducts (i.e., B[a]P), AP sites, intercalated compounds, DNA interstrand crosslinks • How • Recognition and verification of base damage • Incision of DNA strand on either side of damage • Excision of oligonucleotide fragment generated by incisions • Repair synthesis to fill the gap • Ligation of nick in DNA
Nucleotide Excision Repair • Fidelity: Excellent • Consequences of failure • Interference with replication, transcription
Nucleotide Excision Repair Recognition and verification of damage Adapted from Sancar, et al., Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004. 73:39-85
Nucleotide Excision Repair Recognition and verification of damage
Nucleotide Excision Repair Incision on either flank of affected strand
Nucleotide Excision Repair Excision of affected oligonucleotide and resynthesis of strand PIC 4
Nucleotide Excision Repair Ligation of nick in DNA strand by DNA ligase I (not specifically shown) PIC 5
Double Strand Break Repair • Two types of DSB repair • Homologous recombination (HR) • Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) • DSB Caused by: ionizing radiation/ROS, replication fork encountering single-strand break, other repair mechanisms • Experimental evidence suggests NHEJ is the primary mechanism used early in the cell cycle (G1) while HR is used later (S/G2)
Double Strand Break Repair • Consequences of failure • Sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) • Aneuploidy – loss or duplication of chromosomes or chromosomal segments (proposed as the initiating event for cancer)
Double Strand Break RepairHomologous Recombination • Repairs: DNA double-strand breaks • How • Utilizes another DNA molecule that has a similar (homologous) or identical DNA sequence (sister chromatid) • One strand on each side of the break in the damaged molecule is degraded to leave 3’ single strands • One of the single strands then invades the homologous nucleotide sequence of the other DNA molecule using it as a template to reconstruct the damaged molecule • Fidelity: Virtually error free, especially if sister chromatid is used
DSB X X Damage removal, resection strand invasion Displaced yellow strand is captured by blue strand Double-strand Break Repair by Homologous Recombination Crossovers (Holliday junctions) are then resolved Homologous DNA strand Slide courtesy of Jeff Sekelsky
Double Strand Break RepairNon-homologous end joining • Double strand break repair the easy way – just deal with it • How • Protect and trim the ragged ends • Bridge the gap • Ligate the nicks • Fidelity: poor – deletions can result in loss of coding information
Non-homologous End Joining Adapted from Sancar, et al., Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004. 73:39-85
Examples of Human Genetic Diseases Caused by Dysfunctional Repair Pathways
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP) • SNP: a change in a single nucleotide on one allele when a gene on both alleles is compared • Occurrence in human genome: approximately one in every ~1330 bases • An allele is defined as polymorphic if it appears in > 1% of the population • Can alter protein function including that of repair proteins (Ex: XRCC1 used in BER) DNA strand 1 differs from DNA strand 2 at a single base-pair location (a C/T polymorphism).
Mutator Phenotype • Most cancer cells exhibit greater numbers of mutations than would be expected randomly • Mutator phenotype: results from mutations in genes that are responsible for genomic stability (i.e., genes for repair proteins, genes responsible for the proper segregation of chromosomes during mitosis) • Allows for accumulation of massive numbers of mutations • Can have a cascade effect if even more repair proteins become mutated