1 / 41

Part I: 3-sigma anomaly of W->tau nu decay in new physics beyond SM

Part I: 3-sigma anomaly of W->tau nu decay in new physics beyond SM ----first clean hint of right-handed charge current? (hep-ph/0504123). 朱守华（ Shou-hua Zhu） Peking University July 2005 @ Tsinghua Univ. 3-sigma anomaly of W->tau nu measurements Anomaly in 2HDM and MSSM

piper
Download Presentation

Part I: 3-sigma anomaly of W->tau nu decay in new physics beyond SM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Part I: 3-sigma anomaly of W->tau nu decay in new physics beyond SM ----first clean hint of right-handed charge current? (hep-ph/0504123) 朱守华（Shou-hua Zhu） Peking University July 2005 @ Tsinghua Univ. 3-sigma anomaly of W->tau nu measurements Anomaly in 2HDM and MSSM Anomaly indicates right-handed charge current?

  2. Two destinations of puzzles 1: Puzzles stand for new dynamics • Speed of light as constant • - puzzle • Sun neutrino missing 2: Puzzles stand for ignorance (both theoretical and expt.) • CDF di-jet • Re() in K-system • b-inclusive production

  3. ADL final O prel. Anomaly mainly comes from L3

  4. 3-sigma anomaly of W->tau measurements, hep-ex/0412015 New physics?

  5. 3-sigma anomaly of W->tau nu is especially interesting and important: In SM involved is only pure left-handed charge current Simpler kinematics and less hadronic uncertainties.

  6. Possible explanations in new physics beyond the SM: Oblique-type corrections -> NO! Flavor-dependent interaction! Satisfy neutral-current data (Z-decay) at O(0.1%) Satisfy tau-> nu_tau l nu_l data Tan(beta) enhancement flavor interactions Higgs-fermion Yukawa couplings in 2HDM Chargino(Neutrolino)-fermion couplings in MSSM Positive!

  7. 2-Higgs doublet model (2HDM) Negative except for near-degenerate Higgs mass case: Lebedev etal., PRD62(2000)055014

  8. MSSM Use FeynArts, FormCalc, LoopTools to scan parameter space In most cases, delta_new is negative In all cases

  9. Anomaly in 2HDM and MSSM • It is hard to account for anomaly in two models. • And it is even harder to account for both W anomaly and neutral data.

  10. Anomalous left- and right-handed couplings From W->tau nu_tau data:

  11. Constraints from tau-decay data Delta_L and Delta_R are constrainted by Michel parameters which can be extracted from energy spectrum of daughter letopn in tau->nu_tau l nu_l. PDG(2004)

  12. Allowed small regions at 95% CL dR: 0-> 0.12 dL: 1-> 1.005

  13. Anomalous left- and right-handed couplings for 3rd generation quark : From B->X_s gamma measurements: Re(dR)< 4 10-3 for Wtb F. Larios etal., PLB457 (1999)334 |dR| 0.12 for W ?

  14. Summary for 1st part (questions) Is W->tau nu_tau 3-sigma anomaly the first clean signal for the existence of right-handed charge current? How is this anomaly related to fermion mass generation (flavor physics)? Will parity be restored at high energy? Does anomaly indicate the non-universality of gauge interactions for different generation? X.Y. Li and E. Ma, PRL47, 1788(1981)

  15. Part II:Distinguishing Split from TeV (normal)SUSY at ILChep-ph/0407072, PLB604,207(2004) 朱守华 Shou-hua Zhu Peking University July 2005@ Tsinghua Univ.

  16. Outline Why Split SUSY (SS)? How to distinguish SS from TeV SUSY? Chargino pair production at Linear colliders Summary

  17. Naturalness problem in the SM mHphy= mH0 +c 2+…,  ---new physics scale => New Physics should appear at TeV (TeV/ EW ~10) Solutions (TeV scale New Physics) to Naturalness problem TeV SUSY or little Higgs models Low scale gravity Composite Higgs boson etc. Why Split SUSY? (I)

  18. TeV New Physics is an attracting thing (important basis of future colliders), but …

  19. Akani-Hamed, Pheno2005

  20. S. Dawson, LP2005

  21. TeV SUSY is a beautiful thing (GUT, dark matter, aesthetic …), but …

  22. S. Dawson, LP2005

  23. Shortcomings of TeV SUSY • not yet found Higgs  small hierarchy problem (remind: in MSSM at LO mH<MZ) • excess flavor and CP violation =>”CP problem” • fast dim-5 proton decay etc. • …

  24. Seems MNew Physics >>TeV, did we miss something important? Is that possible that naturalness …?

  25. Failure of Naturalness of Cosmological Constant ->… Why Split SUSY? (II)

  26. Akani-Hamed, Pheno2005

  27. Fine tuning => • God • mechanisms Assuming UNKNOWN mechanism for finely tuned CC is also applied to Higgs sector…

  28. GUT and Dark Matter instead of Naturalness are guiding principles  Split Supersymmetry N. Arkani-Hamed &S. Dimopoulos, hep-ph/0405159 • Split Supersymmetry can get (a) GUT ( slightly improved) (b) Dark Matter density (c) higher Higgs mass (120~160 GeV) (d) cures to most of TeV SUSY diseases etc.

  29. Akani-Hamed, Pheno2005

  30. SS has only onefinely tuned and light Higgs boson while other scalars are ultra heavy. Gaugino and Higgsino might be light. Effective Lagrangian at low energy, besides kinetic terms, after integrating out higher scalar mass: What is Split SUSY?

  31. Precisely measuring Higgsino-gaugino-Higgs vertexes e.g. O(0.1 fb) hep-ph/0407108 Scale of scalars is the most characteristic feature of SS, but directly producing scalars other than light Higgs boson is difficult. How to determine scalar mass? (a) Long-lived gluino as a probe of scalar mass at LHC or How to distinguish SS?

  32. (b) Chargino pair production at Linear colliders can probe the properties of chargino S.Y. Choi et.al. (1999) and (2000) and is sensitve to sneutrino mass. Chargino production at LCs

  33. SS Parameter Space & Mixed Region • Assuming gaugino mass unification and dark matter constraint: 0.094 <DMh2<0.129 G. Giudice & A. Romanino, hep-ph/0406088

  34. Point Pa: Differential  and Forward-backward Asymmetry (11) 10 TeV 1 TeV

  35. Point Pa: total  (11), (12) and (22) are all sensitive to sneutrino mass up to 10 TeV for lower M2 and .

  36. Point Pb: Total  (22) Mode is most promising for higher M2 and.

  37. Chargino pair production can probe the sneutrino mass up to 10 TeV. Need further simulation! It provides a very crucial method to distinguish Split from TeV (normal) SUSY. All three modes (11), (12) and (22) should be analyzed. Current and planning colliders can’t cover all SS parameter space. Summary for 2nd part

  38. Thanks for your attention!

More Related