1 / 22

Reliability Standards Committee 2009 Scope and Plan

Reliability Standards Committee 2009 Scope and Plan. Judith James Manager, Reliability Standards. 2009 RSC Scope and Plan for Regional Standards. Coordinate Texas RE Regional Standards development with the development of standards appearing in the NERC work plan.

plato-diaz
Download Presentation

Reliability Standards Committee 2009 Scope and Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reliability Standards Committee2009 Scope and Plan Judith James Manager, Reliability Standards

  2. 2009 RSC Scope and Plan for Regional Standards • Coordinate Texas RE Regional Standards development with the development of standards appearing in the NERC work plan. • Reliability Standards Committee set the example of how to systematically view NERC standards for viable and reasonable regional needs and standards.

  3. NERC Development Plan--location

  4. 2009 RSC Scope and Plan for Regional Standards • Goals that this plan will support: • Help to identify variances early to be included in the continent-wide standard instead of going through regional process. • Ensure that topics addressed by the reliability standards parallel changing industry needs within our region. • Start dialogue with NERC drafting teams to strengthen the relationship with the industry that will ensure adequate regional input to standards development. • Identify potential regional market/operational issues that need to be addressed. • Increase level of awareness for RSC and the ERCOT region’s industry overall. • Empower RSC and the industry to use the standards development process to enhance existing standards---not just creating more rules to follow.

  5. NERC Projects initiated in 2006

  6. NERC Projects initiated in 2007

  7. NERC Projects initiated in 2008

  8. NERC Projects anticipated to commence in 2009

  9. NERC Projects anticipated to commence in 2010/11 • 2010-01 Support Personnel Training • 2010-02 Connecting New Facilities to the Grid • 2010-03 Modeling Data • 2010-04 Demand Data • 2010-05 Protection Systems • 2011-01 Equipment Monitoring and Diagnostic Devices

  10. Plan and Schedule for RSC Evaluation of Projects in 2009 • RSC evaluate proposed standards by dividing 39 NERC projects up into 10 meetings this year (about 4 projects per meeting) • Evaluate by using segment presentations. • Goal: Get through 39 projects this year with an initial cut on whether a potential regional variance or regional standard may be necessary for individual NERC standards that are currently under development within each project.

  11. Plan and Schedule for RSC Evaluation of Projects in 2009 • Seven segments plus ERCOT---eight segments. • Four presentations per RSC meeting---one presentation by each of four different segments. • Alternate next month with four new segments so that no segment has a presentation two months in a row. • Each presentation is a high-level analysis, review, and initial determination as to whether a regional standard or variance may be applicable or necessary for development. • Assign SAR development.

  12. Consumer Date • 2006-01 System Personnel Training 3/4 • 2007-01 Under Frequency Load Shedding 5/6 • 2008-08 EOP Violation Severity Levels Revisions 7/1 • 2009-04 Phasor Measurements Units 9/2 • 2010-04 Demand Data 11/4

  13. Cooperative Date • 2006-04 Backup Facilities 3/4 • 2007-23 Violation Severity Levels 5/6 • 2008-02 Under Voltage Load Shedding 7/1 • 2009-03 Emergency Operations 9/2 • 2011-01 Equipment Monitoring and Diagnostic Devices 11/4

  14. Independent Generator Date • 2006-09 Facility Ratings 3/4 • 2007-09 Generator Verification 5/6 • 2008-01 Voltage and Reactive Control 7/1 • 2007-12 Frequency Response 9/2 • 2010-02 Connecting New Facilities to the Grid 11/4

  15. Independent Power Marketer Date • 2006-03 System Restoration and Blackstart 3/4 • 2007-04 Certifying System Operators 5/6 • 2008-06 Cyber Security — Order 706 7/1 • 2009-02 Real-time Tools 9/2 • 2010-05 Protection Systems 11/4

  16. Independent Retail Electric Provider Date • 2007-02 Operating Personnel Communications Protocols 4/1 • 2007-07 Vegetation Management 6/3 • 2007-11 Disturbance Monitoring 8/5 • 2007-17 Protection System Maintenance & Testing 10/7

  17. Investor Owned Utility Date • 2006-07 Transfer Capabilities: ATC, TTC, CBM, and TRM 4/1 • 2006-08 Transmission Loading Relief 6/3 • 2007-03 Real-time Operations 8/3 • 2008-05 Credible Multiple Element Contingencies 10/7 • 2009-05 Resource Adequacy Assessments 12/2

  18. Municipal Date • 2007-06 System Protection Coordination 4/1 • 2009-01 Disturbance and Sabotage Reporting 6/3 • 2007-14 Permanent Changes to CI Timing Table 8/5 • 2010-01 Support Personnel Training 10/7 • 2010-03 Modeling Data 12/2

  19. ERCOT Date • 2006-02 Assess Transmission Future Needs 4/1 • 2006-06 Reliability Coordination 6/3 • 2007-05 Balancing Authority Controls 8/5 • 2007-18 Reliability-based Control 10/7 • 2008-12 Coordinate Interchange Standards 12/2

  20. Your Presentation Should Include • Overview of the project—introduction of major issues that project addresses. • Project schedule---where is it now? • Name of team member from ERCOT Region. • Summary of project highlights, successes, setbacks. • Any potential reliability/operational/market issues for the ERCOT region. • Comparison of ERCOT regional operations as applies to the project v. other regional operations. • High level review of regional standard applicability if any, including relationship to any protocols. • Is regional standard/variance necessary---first cut decision?

  21. Presentation • Your presentation is not a final decision. • It will be just a first cut, initial, very preliminary, brainstorm if you will, on whether a regional standard may be applicable for your particular project/set of standards. • Presentation about 15 to 30 minutes, depending on the project.

  22. Questions?

More Related