1 / 19

Synopsis of Faculty Promotion Guidelines

Synopsis of Faculty Promotion Guidelines. Salih Duffuaa Systems Engineering Department King Fahd University Of Petroleum & Minerals. Plan of the Presentation. Purpose Criteria Process Tips for Speeding the Process. Introduction.

plato
Download Presentation

Synopsis of Faculty Promotion Guidelines

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Synopsis of Faculty Promotion Guidelines Salih Duffuaa Systems Engineering Department King Fahd University Of Petroleum & Minerals

  2. Plan of the Presentation • Purpose • Criteria • Process • Tips for Speeding the Process

  3. Introduction • The promotion process aims to advise the university on the promotability of a candidate and provide feedback to the candidate through the appropriate dean of his performance in research, teaching and public and university service. The university shall use the promotion process to encourage academic excellence and rectify mediocrity and marginal contribution in a fair and constructive manner. It is to be noted that the University is determined to evaluate the achievements of its faculty by comparison with international standards in all the fields of knowledge, which are relevant to the University program.

  4. Main Elements of Promotion Guidelines • Criteria - Eligibility - Teaching (25%) - Research (60%) - University, Departmental and Public Service (15%) • Process. - Sequence of steps

  5. Eligibility • Degree :PhD • Duration : Four or more years of successful teaching and research at a recognized University, subsequent to attaining the requisite degree, are required; of which at least a one-year service in a Saudi University is required. • Duration: Eight or more years of successful teaching and research work at a recognized Universityat least four years of service in the Associate Professor rank, of which at least a 1-year service in a Saudi University is required

  6. Eligibility • Units of research 4 – units for Associate at least 2 units single authored. At least one unit from journals and at most one unit from conferences. • 6 – units for professorship at least 3 singled authored. At least two units from refereed journals and at most one unit from conferences. In addition to other restrictions.

  7. Research • Quantified by number of units: A unit is a single author publication in one of the coming nine categories. • A scholarly work is to be counted as "1 unit" if it is single authored; "1/2 unit" if it has two authors. If the research was carried out by more than two individuals, it will be regarded as “1/2 unit” for the principal author and “1/4 unit” for each of the others. If another collective work is considered for promotion, then it will count as “1/4 unit” for each researcher.

  8. Research Sub-criteria • 1. Papers in internationally recognized refereed journals; a minimum of one unit is required. • 2. Papers in refereed proceedings in international conferences and specialized symposia; a maximum of one unit is accepted. • 3. Refereed, published, or accepted for publication technical reports from specialized university research centers; a maximum of one unit is accepted. • 4. Refereed textbooks and reference books; a maximum of one unit is accepted. • 5. Refereed authentication reviews of rare books; a maximum of one unit is accepted.

  9. Research Sub-Criteria • 6. Refereed translations of specialized scientific books; a maximum of one unit is accepted. • 7. Refereed books and research reports published by scientific societies/authorities approved by the Scientific Council; a maximum of one unit is accepted. • 8. Inventions and novelties that have patents from recognized patent agencies approved by the Scientific Council. • 9. Distinguished creative activities according to a basis recommended by the Scientific Council and approved by the University Board; a maximum of one unit is accepted.

  10. Teaching Sub-criteria • a- Demonstrated competence in the subject matter in classroom and public presentations (e.g. colloquia, seminars, symposia, short courses, conferences, etc.). • b- Effectiveness in the development and use of innovative methods in teaching such as computer aided instructions. • c- Guidance and leadership in student activities. • d- Initiation and participation in curriculum development (e.g. new courses, new programs, etc.).

  11. Teaching Sub-criteria • e- Effectiveness in the development and use of Instructional Laboratories. • f- Level of participation and effectiveness in the continuing education programs. • g- Textbook authoring. • h- Effectiveness in supervising senior projects, Summer Training and Coop Programs (if applicable). • i- Teaching Load.

  12. Promotability • The candidate will be promoted to the rank of Associate Professor if his total number of points is not less than sixty (60) points, of which at least thirty-five (35) points must be from Research and Scientific Contributions. However, a second condition is that at least two of the three external reviewers (see Appendix A, Sec. 2.4) must recommend promotion of the candidate.

  13. Promotability • The candidate will be promoted to the rank of Professor if his total number of points is not less than sixty (60) points, of which at least forty (40) points must be from Research and Scientific Contributions. However, a second condition is that all three external reviewers must recommend promotion of the candidate. In case two of the three external reviewers recommend promotion and one does not recommend promotion of the candidate, a fourth external reviewer shall be asked to evaluate the candidate's achievements in Research and Scientific Contributions, and his opinion will be final.

  14. Process • Candidate submit his request to Department chairman six months prior to completing the time requirement. • The Dept council or the chairman shall form an Ad-hoc committee to review dossier and confirm eligibility. The committee selects 8 referees for the case. • The college council examines the case and select 8 referees for the case. • The VRGS&SR presents the case for the SC to examine it again and select five referees. Cont…

  15. Process • The SC or who ever it delegates solicit external evaluations and prepare a report regarding the promotability of the candidates • The SC discusses the report and make a decision whether the candidate is promotable or not. • The rector may approve or object to the SC council decision. • If the SC insists regarding his decision the case will be presented to the University Board and the Board decision is final.

  16. Dossier: appendix C • Summary of Experience Record (Resume). • Teaching. • Research. • Professional activities. • University, Departmental and Public Service

  17. Tips • Well prepared Dossier. • Precise and accurate information. • Avoid triviality. • Department committee input. • Chairman input. • Internal committee • Selection of referees.

  18. Quiz • What is the most detrimental element for research in the promotion guideline ?

  19. Questions & Comments Thank You

More Related