Leadership Team Meeting

1. October 30, 2013 Leadership Team Meeting

2. Bell Ringer Choosefour formative assessment practices that research reviews suggest lead to improved student achievement.

3. Clear Learning Goal • Use formative assessment to differentiate teaching and learning • Develop deeper knowledge of questioning and engagement

4. Clear Learning Goals • Demonstrate the fundamentals of free throw shooting to successfully hit a shot

5. Free Throw Shooting

6. Directions • Write down the fundamental steps needed to successfully hit free throws

7. Free Throw Shooting

8. Steps • Feet shoulder width apart • Determine your ritual • Reach for the rim, inside the rim or back of the rim • Balance the ball on your fingertips • Arms in L shape • Follow the motion through the body • Follow through

9. With a shoulder partner physically practice steps to fundamentally shoot free throws correctly

10. Formative Assessment • Feet shoulder width apart • Determine your ritual • Reach for the rim, inside the rim or back of the rim • Balance the ball on your fingertips • Arms in L shape • Follow the motion through the body • Follow through

11. Go to the gym

12. Assessment Results • ___________ out of ___________ made their first free throw attempt • ___________ out of ___________ made their second free throw attempt • ___________ out of ___________ made their summative free throw attempt

13. Next Steps • Do we move on? • What about students that have mastered the skill or the ones who need much remediation? • Did our formative assessment align with our Clear Learning Goal & what we taught? • Did we put you in the game situation?

14. Next Steps cont’ • Did we have mastery of the formative before we did the summative? • Did we get the problem fixed so could have growth? • Did we individualize or regroup?

15. How did you organize the cards? • Reflecting on this list, which skills are not applicable in science education?

16. Do Categories Matter?

17. Program Review (PR) Scoring Guide

18. Program Review Calculations Each of the 3 Program Review areas (Arts & Humanities, Writing, and Practical Living) is comprised of 4 standards (Curriculum/Instruction, Formative/Summative Assessment, Professional Development, and Administrative Support). Step 1: Average the characteristic scores for a score for each standard. • Scores range from 0-3 for each standard • 0 – No Implementation, 1– Needs Improvement, 2 –Proficient, and 3 Distinguished Step 2: Add the 4 standard scores to get a single number for each Program Review area. • Scores range 0-12 for each Program Review area • The cut score 8 is Proficient and 10.8 is Distinguished Step 3: Add the three Program Review area scores for a total Program Review score. • Scores range between 0-36 Step 4: Divide the total number by 24 (proficient (8) x 3 areas = 24). • This number yields the percent of the 23 points earned (number of points possible in Unbridled Learning accountability model for PR when Learners and PR are combined).

19. Program Review Data Release Calculation Example

20. Program Review Data Release Combining Next-Generation Learners and Program Reviews *Combined Overall Score used to calculate new 70th and 90th percentile cut for summer 2014 targets

21. Exit Slip Reflect on conversations around formative and summative assessments. What adjustments do you need to implement to develop enduring skills in students?