1 / 18

GCMs Validation Towards Realistic Impacts Assessment

GCMs Validation Towards Realistic Impacts Assessment. Data. Knowledge. Mpelasoka F., Bates B., Jones R. and Whetton P. | CSIRO Atmospheric Research. Creditability of GCMs. GCMs validation is hard and perhaps even a poorly defined problem

portia
Download Presentation

GCMs Validation Towards Realistic Impacts Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GCMs Validation Towards Realistic Impacts Assessment Data Knowledge Mpelasoka F., Bates B., Jones R. and Whetton P. • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  2. Creditability of GCMs GCMs validation is hard and perhaps even a poorly defined problem • Increasing confusions and uncertainties as models become complex (Rind, 1999; Petersen, 2000) • Inadequacy of traditional objective skill measures for diagnostics relevant to impacts assessment • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  3. Objectives To validate GCMs in terms of signals interpretable in the context of climate impacts • To examine time series structures for climate elements of interest • To evaluate covariance across spatial and temporal scales at which impacts occur • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  4. Strategy: Eigen-AnalysisBased Validation Singular Spectral Analysis (SSA) Scheme • Local assessment of time series structure Common Principal Components (CPCs) Model • Variability assessment of spatial and temporal eigenvalues • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  5. Basic SSA Scheme STEP 1 + STEP 2 :DECOMPOSITION STAGE STEP 3 + STEP 4:RECONSTRUCTION STAGE • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  6. CPCs Model Covariance matrices have different eigenvalues but identical eigenvectors (Flurry, 1984) • Implies multiple data sets share common components, but each set has different eigenvalues associated with those components • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  7. GCMs and Data GCMs:Mk3 (CSIRO, Australia) and HadCM3 (Hadley Centre, UK) • Mk3 horizontal resolution: 3.73 x 3.75 deg • HadCM3 horizontal resolution: 2.50 x 3.75 deg Data:Daily series of gridded simulated and observed variables for 1971-2000 • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  8. Test Site • Murray-Darling (M-D) Basin • Area = 1 060 000 km2 • Mean Precip = 508 000 GL/Yr • Runoff = 23 850 GL/Yr • Most precipitation is evaporated • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  9. Seasonal Distribution Observed Mk3 GCM M-D Basin: JJA 1971- 2000 Potential Evaporation • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  10. Seasonal Distribution Observed Mk3 GCM M-D Basin: JJA Precip 1971-2000 • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  11. Seasonal Distribution Observed HadCM3 GCM M-D Basin: JJA Precipitation 1971-2000 • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  12. Seasonal Distribution Observed HadCM3 GCM M-D Basin: DJF Tmax 1971-2000 • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  13. Local Assessment (SSA) Observed Mk3 GCM Bourke: JJA precip series structure (1971-2000) • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  14. Local Assessment: ‘Base’ Signal Observed Mk3 GCM Bourke: reconstructed JJA 1971-2000 precip ‘BASE’ signal • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  15. Local Assessment (Q-Q Plots) ‘BASE’ signals ‘PERTURBATIONS’ Bourke: Independent comparison of base and perturbations JJA precip signal distributions • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  16. Spatial Variability: Partial Eigenvalue Spectrum JJA precip variance DJF precip variance Partial eigenvalues of M-D Basin observed precip (95% confidence limits) versus partial eigenvalues of CSIRO Mk3 simulation • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  17. Concluding Remarks Averages-based validation • Tends to mask much needed detail relevant to realistic impact assessment (variability and extremes) • Different explanation might account for the same observations Eigen-analysis based validation • Considers structure and variability across a spectrum of spatial (global, regional, local) and temporal (inter-decadal, inter-annual, seasonal) scales • Pinpoints the causes of mismatches between observations and GCM outputs, leading to GCM improvement • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

  18. Acknowledgements • Climate Impacts LINK Project, UK (HadCM3 data provision) • Janice Bathols and Harvey Davies - CSIRO, AR (NAP software application support) • Lorraine Bates and Geoff Hodgson - CSIRO, LW (GIS technical advisory support) • | CSIRO Atmospheric Research

More Related