1 / 14

INTEGRATED OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME

INTEGRATED OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME. Integrated operational programme. Thematic operational program in programming period 2007-2013 The managing authority of the IOP is the Ministry for Regional Development Main targets: Modernisation of public administration

prema
Download Presentation

INTEGRATED OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INTEGRATED OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME

  2. Integrated operational programme Thematic operational program in programming period 2007-2013 The managing authority of the IOP is the Ministry for Regional Development Main targets: Modernisation of public administration Increasing the quality and availability of public services Support of territorial development 5. 10. 2014 www.strukturalni-fondy.cz/iop 2

  3. Intermediate bodies of IOP I. 5. 10. 2014 www.strukturalni-fondy.cz/iop 3

  4. Intermediate bodies of IOP II. 5. 10. 2014 www.strukturalni-fondy.cz/iop 4

  5. Priority axes and allocation of IOP www.strukturalni-fondy.cz/iop

  6. Provider of grant and allocation of IOP 5. 10. 2014 www.strukturalni-fondy.cz/iop 6

  7. Benefits/disadvantages of IOPs structure Benefits Concentration of themes into 1 programme Otherwise into 5 or 6 OPs Lower expenditures for administration capacity Linked topics (e.g. Intervention areas 5.2c) + 3.1b) Well experienced managing authority MA of JROP and SPD Disadvantages Multi-targeting of some priority axes=Gift of the Danaans 5 intermediate bodies Only one IB had previous experience with implementation of structural funds Payments through several IBs 7

  8. IUDP Integrated urban development plans • Intervention area 5.2 Improving the environment in problematic housing estates • Global objective: Enhancing of the quality of life and environment for inhabitans of problematic housing estates • Coherent area with at least 500 flats in towns over 20 000 inhabitants • Criteria of a deprivated zone follow Article No 47 of Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006 8

  9. Supported activities Revitalisation of public areas Regeneration of apartment houses Pilot projects focused on solving problems of Roma communities 5. 10. 2014 www.strukturalni-fondy.cz/iop 9

  10. Financial allocation • EUR 192 million is allocated for the intervention area 5.2 from the ERDF 5. 10. 2014 www.strukturalni-fondy.cz/iop 10

  11. Process of implemention of IUDP CRDcontrols realisation of a payment application A town calls for project proposals MA issues a decision on provision of a grant Applicants propose projects to the municipal authority CRD controls admissibility and formal properties of proposals A town choses and approves projects (in compliance with IUDP) 5. 10. 2014 www.strukturalni-fondy.cz/iop 11

  12. Case study – Brno I. • IOP intervention area 5.2c) • 7 projects for regeneration buildings • Allocation - 57 728 925 CZK • Implementation period: 2010-2011 • Activities: complete reconstruction of buildings, measures for energy savings, construction of social apartments

  13. Case study – Brno II. • IOP intervention areas • 5.2c) + 3.1b) • Childcare/Education centre with social programmes for family with children • Implementation: 2011-2012 www.strukturalni-fondy.cz/iop

  14. Thank you for your attention Lumíra Kafková IOP Managing Authority kaflum@mmr.cz

More Related