1 / 12

Peer reviewed manuscript | Journal Submission | Qualitative research journal

Journal submission is a detailed and time-consuming process. Each journal has distinct submission requirements, and every aspect of a journalu2019s requirements must be determined and satisfied even if changes to your manuscript are required. This service will save you time and frustration.<br>Visit us @ https://pubrica.com/services/publication-support/journal-submission/<br><br>

pubrica
Download Presentation

Peer reviewed manuscript | Journal Submission | Qualitative research journal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IN ACADEMIC JOURNALS, HOW ARE MANUSCRIPTS USUALLY PEER-REVIEWED? • An Academic presentation by • Dr. Nancy Agnes, Head, Technical Operations, Pubrica • Group: www.pubrica.com • Email: sales@pubrica.com

  2. Introduction • In academic journals, manuscripts are typically peer-reviewed through a rigorous evaluation process involving external experts in the field. • The peer review process helps ensure the quality, validity, and significance of the research before it is accepted for publication. • Here is a general overview of how manuscripts are usually peer-reviewed: contd...

  3. SUBMISSION: • After a researcher submits their manuscript to a journal, it undergoes an initial screening by the journal's editorial team. • They assess whether the manuscript meets the journal submission scope and guidelines. • It proceeds to the peer review in the science stage if it passes the initial screening. contd...

  4. REVIEWER SELECTION: • THE JOURNAL'S EDITOR(S) IDENTIFIES POTENTIAL REVIEWERS WITH EXPERTISE IN THE SUBJECT AREA RELEVANT TO THE MANUSCRIPT. • REVIEWERS ARE TYPICALLY RESEARCHERS, SCHOLARS, OR EXPERTS WHO HAVE PUBLISHED IN THE FIELD THEMSELVES • REVIEWER INVITATION: • REVIEWERS ARE INVITED TO ASSESS THE MANUSCRIPT BY THE EDITOR(S). • THEY CAN ACCEPT OR DECLINE THE INVITATION BASED ON THEIR AVAILABILITY AND EXPERTISE. contd...

  5. PEER REVIEW PROCESS: • REVIEWERS EVALUATE THE MANUSCRIPT FOR ITS SCIENTIFIC RIGOUR, METHODOLOGY, ORIGINALITY, CLARITY OF WRITING, AND CONTRIBUTION TO THE FIELD. • THEY PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES, AND AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT. • THIS ASSESSMENT MAY BE DONE THROUGH A SINGLE-BLIND REVIEW (WHERE THE REVIEWERS KNOW THE AUTHOR'S IDENTITY BUT NOT VICE VERSA) OR A DOUBLE-BLIND PEER REVIEW (WHERE THE IDENTITIES OF BOTH AUTHORS AND REVIEWERS ARE CONCEALED). contd...

  6. REVIEWER COMMENTS: • REVIEWERS TYPICALLY PROVIDE DETAILED COMMENTS, SUGGESTIONS, AND CRITIQUES TO THE EDITOR(S) REGARDING THE MANUSCRIPT'S STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES. • THEY MAY RECOMMEND ACCEPTANCE, REVISION, OR REJECTION BASED ON THEIR ASSESSMENT. • AUTHOR REVISIONS: • IF REQUESTED, THE EDITOR(S) COMMUNICATE THE REVIEWER'S COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS TO THE AUTHOR. • THE AUTHOR THEN REVISES THE MANUSCRIPT ACCORDINGLY, ADDRESSING THE REVIEWER'S CONCERNS AND MAKING IMPROVEMENTS. contd...

  7. EDITOR'S DECISION: • THE EDITOR(S) CONSIDER THE REVIEWER'S COMMENTS, THE REVISED MANUSCRIPT, AND THEIR ASSESSMENT TO DECIDE THE MANUSCRIPT. • THE DECISION CAN BE ACCEPTANCE, ACCEPTANCE WITH MINOR REVISIONS, ACCEPTANCE WITH MAJOR REVISIONS, OR REJECTION. • MULTIPLE REVISIONS AND REVIEWS MAY SOMETIMES BE REQUIRED BEFORE REACHING A FINAL DECISION. • PUBLICATION: • ONCE A MANUSCRIPT IS ACCEPTED, IT MOVES FORWARD IN THE PUBLICATION PROCESS, WHICH INCLUDES COPYEDITING, TYPESETTING, AND FORMATTING. • FINALLY, THE MANUSCRIPT IS PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL, MAKING IT ACCESSIBLE TO THE ACADEMIC COMMUNITY. contd...

  8. It's important to note that the peer review process can vary slightly between journal format and disciplines. • Some journals may also incorporate additional steps, such as a second round of review or an editorial board meeting to discuss the manuscript's fate. • The overall goal of peer review manuscripts is to ensure the quality and integrity of published qualitative research journals by subjecting them to rigorous evaluation by experts in the field. • To know more about Journal submission, check our study guide, What Are The Process Involved In Journal Submission? contd...

  9. In academic journals of scientific research, manuscripts are typically PubMed peer-reviewed through anonymous evaluation by independent experts in the same or related field as the author(s) of the manuscript. • The peer-review process helps to ensure the quality and validity of research published in academic journals. • ·Check our sample work to know and learn more about "Journal submission report". contd...

  10. About Pubrica • Pubrica adheres to the highest standards and regulations of journal publishing ethics in all phases of services and operations. • Pubrica follows the International Council of Medical Journal Editors' (ICJME) authorship rules, and the scope of services will be continuously updated in accordance with the Committee of Publication Ethics (COPE) and International Society of Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP) principles.

  11. Contact Us UNITED KINGDOM +44 1618186353 INDIA +91-9884350006 EMAIL sales@pubrica.com

More Related