1 / 26

Katie Zaback State Higher Education Executive Officers Joseph Curtin

SHEEO Webinar Staffing Trends in Public Colleges and Universities: A National View with a State and an Institutional Level Perspective. Katie Zaback State Higher Education Executive Officers Joseph Curtin Director of Institutional Research for the Utah System of Higher Education

rafael
Download Presentation

Katie Zaback State Higher Education Executive Officers Joseph Curtin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SHEEO WebinarStaffing Trends in Public Colleges and Universities: A National View with a State and an Institutional Level Perspective Katie Zaback State Higher Education Executive Officers Joseph Curtin Director of Institutional Research for the Utah System of Higher Education Michael Torrens Director of Analysis, Assessment & Accreditation at Utah State University June 23, 2011

  2. Overview • Report Overview • Report Findings • A state example of examining fall staff data • Lessons learned from analyzing fall staff data at the institutional level

  3. Funding and Enrollment Trends

  4. Methodology • Staffing data is from IPEDS Fall Staff survey which is conducted in odd years • Also used data from Institutional Characteristics and 12-Month Enrollment Survey • Used staff (headcount) per 100 annual student FTE • Time Period is 2001 to 2010

  5. Key Groupings Note: Other administrative was only included in the 2001 fall staff data collection. In later years the definition was incorporated into the executive/administrative and managerial category which is why it was grouped there.

  6. Overall Staff Trends

  7. Overall Staff Trends by Sector

  8. Overall Staff Trends by Sector

  9. Overall Staff Trends by Sector

  10. Overall Staff Trends by Sector

  11. Overall Staff Trends by Sector

  12. Trends in Full-time/Part-time Status

  13. Trends in Full-time/Part-time Status

  14. Trends in Full-time/Part-time Status

  15. Trends in Staffing Types

  16. Trends in Staffing Types -20%

  17. Composition of Staff by Sector

  18. Composition of Staff by Sector

  19. Simple Explanation: Economic Situation FY 09 -17% Base Starting Point FY 11 Additional Cuts of 2% - $13 M No Additional Cuts -3%Leg. action $93 M 8% ARRA 1 Time Final Cut of 12% FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012

  20. Absorbed enrollment increases Fall 2008 + 11,896 students Fall 2009 + 12,632 students Fall 2010 + 8,156 students Total Students + 32,684 students

  21. What is impact of $93 - million cuts?

  22. faculty

  23. Difficulties with IPEDS Summary Data • Shift in data based on changes in who makes the decisions (within an institutions ) • Clerical & Secretarial now reported in Technical and Paraprofessional • Inconsistent classifications between institutions for the same job title

  24. USU: What Did We Learn • This type of study is a great starting point for discussions and further research; it can either support or dispel widely held assumptions. • Longitudinal IPEDS data studies are sensitive to start/end dates and choice, specification and grouping of data…this can be misleading. • Question: Is the large increase in “Other Professionals” due to structural changes in Higher Ed, or is this category becoming a kind of catch-all?

  25. Visit http://www.sheeo.org/pubs/Fall_Staffing-Final05-24-2011.pdfFor a copy of this report. For Additional Information Contact: Katie Zaback kzaback@sheeo.org 303-541-1638

More Related