180 likes | 500 Views
12 th U.S./North American Mine Ventilation Symposium. John Ascuaga’s Nugget Casino Resort Reno, NV, USA June 11, 2008. Conveyor Belt Entry Fire Hazards and Control. Michael A. Hockenberry U.S. Department of Labor - MSHA Approval & Certification Center Triadelphia, WV, USA
E N D
12th U.S./North American Mine Ventilation Symposium John Ascuaga’s Nugget Casino Resort Reno, NV, USA June 11, 2008
Conveyor Belt Entry Fire Hazards and Control Michael A. Hockenberry U.S. Department of Labor - MSHA Approval & Certification Center Triadelphia, WV, USA hockenberry.michael@dol.gov 304-547-2075 Harry C. Verakis U.S. Department of Labor - MSHA Approval & Certification Center Triadelphia, WV, USA verakis.harry@dol.gov 304-547-2082
Outline • Introduction • Conveyor belt fire incident data • Common ignition sources of belt fires • Typical combustible materials located in belt entry • Fire prevention, detection, and suppression • Regulatory requirements • Impact of belt fires • Summary
Introduction • Conveyor belt entry fires are a major safety and health risk • Quick detection and response is critical to control and extinguishment • MSHA reporting criteria has recently changed • 30 CFR Part 50 • Changed in December 2006 from 30 minutes to the current 10 minute criteria in UG coal mines • Fire meeting this criteria must be reported to MSHA within 15 minutes
Conveyor Belt Fire Incident Data • Belt fires represent 15-20 percent of all underground coal mine fires • 1980 to 2005 - 63 belt entry fires • Friction heating accounted for 36% of belt entry fires • 18% fires caused by friction at belt drive • 18% fires caused by friction along belt • Frictional heating most common ignition source of belt entry fires
Conveyor Belt Fire Incident Data Conveyor Belt Entry Fires: Ignition Sources
Conveyor Belt Fire Incident Data • Aracoma Alma fire not included in previous slide data, occurred after data was published • Aracoma Alma belt fire caused by belt rubbing structure – frictional heating • Aracoma fire - Ignition source consistent with data (36% of fires caused by frictional heating along conveyor belt) • 7 conveyor belt fires reported from 1/1/2006 to 5/16/2008 (including Aracoma 1/19/06) • 3 - frictional heating • 2 - electrical • 1 - rollers/bearings • 1 - unknown
Belt and Other Combustible Fire Hazards • Abundant fuel load in belt entry • Conveyor belt • Coal (run of the mine coal and fine coal) • Hydrocarbons (grease and oil) • Roof control (wood supports) • Fires in belt entries can propagate quickly • Amount of available fuel • Fire resistance of conveyor belting • Width, thickness, and construction of conveyor belt • Ventilation
Belt and Other Combustible Fire Hazards • Belt entry fires have consumed up to 610 m (2000 ft) of conveyor belting in one event • Previous large scale testing • Air ventilation optimum flame propagation is ≈ 300 fpm • Measures to reduce belt entry fires • Increasing fire resistance of conveyor belt • Maintain equipment, i.e. belt drives, belt rollers, take-up units, alignment, etc • Decrease amount of combustibles in entry such as spillage, coal fines, and rib sloughage • Most often cited safety standard 30 CFR 75.400 – accumulation of combustible materials
Fire Protection Requirements • Several MSHA regulations addressing conveyor belts – 75.1100 Subpart L • Slippage and sequence switches • Fire resistant conveyor belting • Fire detection and warning systems • Fire fighting equipment • Fire suppression systems • Ventilation – Part 75 Subpart D • All minimum standards intended to reduce fire incidents, alarm, and control
Fire Protection Requirements • Fire Suppression Systems (belt drive area) • Automatic sprinkler system • Water spray system (deluge type) • Automatic dry chemical system • Foam generating systems • Properly designed and maintained • Adequate, reliable water supply
Fire Protection • Importance of properly designed suppression system • Width of conveyor belts have gradually increased • Once 30” to 42” belt • Currently some belt widths are 72”, 84”, 96”, and 108” • Increased fuel load = increased hazard • Belt width directly impacts suppression system design • Ventilation, entry size, belt width can all impact effectiveness of fire suppression system • Current large scale fire testing • Partnership between NIOSH and MSHA • Evaluating the suppression performance of different types of fire suppression systems under ventilated conditions (to 1400 fpm)
Fire Detection • Importance of early detection • Detection systems • Carbon Monoxide detection • Smoke • Heat • Various fire signature detection • Incipient fire stage = greatest opportunity for extinguishment
Impacts of Conveyor Belt Fires • Historically have resulted in injuries and loss of life • Monetary Impact – dependant on fire size • Lost production days • Equipment damage • Extended work hours • Extinguishment cost (suppression agents) • Sealing of area or mine • Rehabilitation costs • Marianna mine fire – March 1988 • Fire fighting efforts alone cost $5 to $6 million • Not including other associated costs
Summary • Conveyor belt fires have resulted in injuries, fatalities, and have a large economic impact • Statistically belt entry fires account for 15-20% of total fires • 36% belt entry fires due to frictional heating • Fire Protection Requirements • Measures taken to reduce or extinguish conveyor belt fires • Improve fire resistance of conveyor belt • Conveyor system maintenance • Minimize amount of combustibles in entry • Properly designed and maintained detection • Properly chosen and maintained fire hose, couplings, thread compatibility • Fire suppression systems
Conveyor Belt Entry Fire Hazards and Control THANK YOU Michael A. Hockenberry U.S. Department of Labor - MSHA Approval & Certification Center Triadelphia, WV, USA hockenberry.michael@dol.gov 304-547-2075 Harry C. Verakis U.S. Department of Labor - MSHA Approval & Certification Center Triadelphia, WV, USA verakis.harry@dol.gov 304-547-2082