1 / 47

Sustaining a Financially Vibrant Healthcare Organization Kevin D. Gore, CPA Partner BKD, LLP

June 5, 2013 MS Healthcare Executives Summer Meeting. Sustaining a Financially Vibrant Healthcare Organization Kevin D. Gore, CPA Partner BKD, LLP. The Financial Perspective. Recap of major changes in health care payment reform history Overview of health care sector

raziya
Download Presentation

Sustaining a Financially Vibrant Healthcare Organization Kevin D. Gore, CPA Partner BKD, LLP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. June 5, 2013 MS Healthcare ExecutivesSummer Meeting Sustaining a Financially Vibrant Healthcare Organization Kevin D. Gore, CPA Partner BKD, LLP

  2. The Financial Perspective • Recap of major changes in health care payment reform history • Overview of health care sector • Surviving in today’s world • Opportunities that still exist • Outlook for 2014 and Beyond

  3. The Financial Perspective

  4. Historical Changes in Healthcare Reimbursement • 1966 – Medicare Created • Expanded coverage to the elderly and reimbursed hospital care at “reasonable cost” • 1984 – Inpatient PPS • How are we going to survive without cost reimbursement? • 1992 – Physician Fee Schedule (RBRVS) • What are the physicians going to do? • 1997 – Balanced Budget Act of 1997 • Forecast by many organizations to lead to the closure of up to 15% of the hospitals • 2010 – Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act • Projected to be most significant change since 1966

  5. Balanced Budget Act of 1997 Created the following changes: • Critical Access Hospitals • Prospective payment systems for: • Skilled nursing (RUGs in 1998) • Outpatients (APCs in 2000) • Home health (HHRGs in 2000) • Rehab (CMGs in 2002) • Transfer DRG payment reduction • Rural floor for wage index purposes • Medicare+ Choice

  6. Balanced Budget Act of 1997 • There were forecasts of hospital closures in rural communities throughout the country • The forecasted savings over a 5-year period by the CBO was $160,000,000,000 (billion) and $394 billion over a 10-year period • Hospitals focused on three primary areas: • Consolidations • Integration • Cost reductions

  7. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) • Signed into law on March 23, 2010 (three years ago) • Significant items • Health insurance exchanges (2014) • ACOs and Medicare Shared Savings Program (in process) • Pre-existing conditions coverage • Individual mandate • Expansion of Medicaid with the ability to opt out • Impact is likely to be greater on the delivery of health care than the mechanisms of reimbursement when compared to BBA 97

  8. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare)

  9. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) • CBO projects that ObamaCare will reduce spending by a net $109 billion over a 10 year period • Remember BBA 97 was projected to reduce spending by over $390 billion over a 10 year period

  10. My View on the Health Care Sector Today • Providers have done well managing costs despite decreasing volumes and reduced reimbursement environment • Many benchmarks have approached or achieved pre-recession peaks • Health care reform implementation will continue while many incremental challenges remain • Heavy investment in information technology, physicians, and integration to continue • Rapid pace of consolidation likely to continue • Next challenge is finding the next level of cost savings

  11. Ongoing Challenges • Relatively high unemployment, reduced health insurance benefits • Medicaid funding pressures and growing enrollment • Medicare: weak update factors, RACs, sequestration, and the quality provisions (VBP, HAC penalties, readmission penalties, etc.) • Commercial plans offering smaller rate increases, seeking value-based contracts and pushing high-deductible plans • Many of the “easier” cost cutting tactics already deployed • Inpatient utilization trends remain generally weak • Cost of employing physicians raises fixed costs • Ongoing competition from physician offices and privately owned treatment centers • Rising average age of plant • Public disclosure of “pricing data” by CMS

  12. Medicare Dollars at Risk under Quality Provisions ACA = Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. VBP = Value Based Purchasing.

  13. Some Benchmarks Approaching Pre-Recession Levels Days’ Cash on Hand EBIDA Margin (%) Capital Exp./ Depreciation (%) Debt Service Coverage (x)

  14. Public Scrutiny of Pricing • IP Charge Data released by CMS on May 8 for 100 procedures • OP Charge Data released by CMS on June 3 for 30 procedures

  15. Affordable Care Act and Organic Change • Supreme Court ruling gave hospital leadership more confidence to accelerate reform preparation activities • Reform efforts likely to continue down the path they are on • Lower costs – pressure to lower costs continues unabated • More value-based reimbursement • Continued development of shared risk models • Physician employment trends continue • Focus on improved quality remains • Continued consolidation • Still ample uncertainty • Political opposition • Which states will opt out of or delay Medicaid expansion? • Decision will impact the envisioned reduction in uninsured • Could lead to greater variability in state Medicaid programs and cost structures

  16. Transitioning to the New World after ACA • Value-based orientation replacing fee-for-service. A slow process. • Emerging delivery system: incentivize better care coordination, reduction in practice variation, better quality of care, higher patient satisfaction in lieu of volume-based production • Incentives of current system still support higher volume, market share, key service line growth; are turned upside down in value-oriented system • Can you back-fill lost volume though market share growth? Does volume move to high quality, transparent provider or to lower cost provider? • Moving too quickly to value-based approach costs revenue and pressures margins. Can providers lower costs fast enough to offset revenue loss? • Moving too slowly to value-based approach may leave you vulnerable when delivery system finally reaches ‘tipping’ point You will have to be successful while living in two worlds at once

  17. Surviving in today’s world • Monitor and evaluate the financial stability of the organization • Evaluate the mission and goal of the organization • Consider and discuss the likely merger/consolidation candidates • Review the current reimbursement opportunities • Plan for cost accounting of some sort • Be able to explain the organization’s strategy and preparation for addressing health care reform

  18. Financial Stability Factors Below are some key indicators that every CEO and CFO should be monitoring • Days cash on hand • Days revenue in AR • Debt service coverage ratio • Debt to capitalization • EBIDA • Make sure you select the proper benchmark (for-profit vs. not-for-profit, etc.) • Develop a trend analysis for your organization

  19. Benchmark Information • Days Cash on Hand • (Cash + Unrestricted Investments)/Expenses less depreciation and amortization • Increasing values are favorable • Where is the cash going if decreasing • Internal funding of construction projects • Operating losses • Investment in strategic initiatives • Days cash on hand – provides flexibility and cushion for error

  20. Benchmark Information • Days Revenue in Patient Receivables • Net patient accounts receivable/(Net patient service revenues/365) • Decreasing values are favorable • Measures average time to collect patient receivables • Consider breaking break down into segments • Discharged not final billed • Percent of receivables over 120 days from discharge • Continuing decreases in days revenue in accounts receivable might actually pose problems for an organization as it puts pressure on liquidity

  21. Benchmark Information • Debt Service Coverage Ratio • (Net Income + Interest Expense + Depreciation)/(Debt Principal Payments + Interest Expense) • Increasing values are favorable • Affected by profitability and depreciation changes • Consider including a historical (using current year results) and a maximum annual (using peak debt service) • Maximum annual is a way to project future cash flow/debt service problems • Useful in planning future financings • Benchmark indicates how leveraged is the organization? Can you access the capital market to implement strategy if needed?

  22. Benchmark Information • Debt to Capitalization • Long-term Debt/(Long-term Debt + Net Assets) • Decreasing values are favorable • Higher values indicate a reliance on debt in prior years or a continuing decrease in net assets • Lower values indicate a historical use of equity/profits to finance assets • This measurement needs to be evaluated in connection with these other benchmarks • Debt service coverage ratio • Average age of plant • Larger organizations tend to have higher ratios due to perception of less overall risk due to size • Benchmark is often a limitation on future borrowings if too high

  23. Benchmark Information • EBIDA and EBIDA Percentage • Earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization • Percentage Based on Operating Revenue • Increasing values are favorable • Makes it easier to analyze overall profitability without the effects of financing decisions of the past • A good indicator of the ability of the organization to service debt • Often used in mergers/acquisitions to estimate purchase price

  24. Evaluate the Mission and Goals • One thing is certain, change will continue to occur and the pace is likely to accelerate • What is the most important issue for the organization: • Remain independent • Keep a full service hospital in the community • Provide the community with the best care possible • Be financially sound and prepared for the future

  25. Merger, Acquisition and Consolidation • In a recent study, 8 out of 10 hospital CEOs indicated their board had discussed or performed a formal analysis of options for merger, acquisition or consolidation • If you are not thinking about this issue, then you are behind schedule • What is merger or acquisition and who is likely to consider?

  26. Merger, Acquisition and Consolidation Different forms of Merger/Acquisition • Affiliations • Management contract • Lease arrangement • Purchase

  27. Merger, Acquisition and Consolidation Who is likely to be considering merger, etc.? • Financially challenged organizations • Financially strong organizations • Large health systems • Critical access hospitals • Urban providers • Rural hospitals • Physician practices

  28. Merger, Acquisition and Consolidation Recent Merger Activity • Ascension Health • University of Arkansas and St. Vincent • Wise Regional and North Texas Community Hospital • FTC now closely scrutinizing deals & rejecting some For Profit Companies are Stockpiling Cash • Tenet - $364 million (222% increase) • CHS - $388 million (199% increase) • HCA - $705 million (89% increase) Expectations are high for increased merger activity in late 2013 through 2014

  29. Current Reimbursement Opportunities • Medicare Disproportionate Share payments • Medicare Transfer DRGs • Readmission Reduction Program • Medicare Wage Index • Medicare Bad Debts • 340B Drug Pricing Program • Uncompensated care

  30. Current Reimbursement Opportunities • Get a copy of your Medicare Cost Report when you go home

  31. Medicare Disproportionate Share Change in payment method required by ACA • Projected to reduce Medicare DSH payments by $22.1 billion over 5 years • 75% of the payment will now be based on a new formula based on uncompensated care • Uncompensated care currently will be defined as Medicaid eligible and SSI days • This change will shift reimbursement between providers and create winners and losers • Mississippi projected to lose over $21,000,000 from the reallocation

  32. Medicare Disproportionate Share Opportunities (not for CAHs) • Current system • Review your Medicare cost report • Worksheet E, Part A Lines 30-34 • Ensure you are counting ALL Medicaid eligible days • Review the SSI percentage on line 30 • File a protest on your cost report for the calculation of the SSI percentage and other DSH calculation issues

  33. Medicare Disproportionate Share Opportunities (not for CAHs) • New system (starts in FFY14) • Continue to closely evaluate Medicaid eligibility testing and capturing Medicaid eligible days • Continue to work on identifying SSI patients • Consider working to get patients to apply for SSI • Develop reporting mechanisms to accurately track and record charity and bad debt costs

  34. SSI Trending – Aged Population Source: 2012 Annual Report of the SSI Program

  35. SSI Opportunities for Improvement • Evaluate opportunity by comparing Medicare dual eligible days compared to your SSI days • Request historical SSI detail from CMS at DataUseAgreement@cms.hhs.gov • Train hospital staff to increase applications by instructing/assisting Medicare patients requesting charity to apply for SSI • Attempt to identify those patients that are SSI eligible but that have not applied • Mississippi is a “front door” SSI state – in other words, one application, enroll in SSI then automatic in Medicaid • Work with the local SSA office to enroll patient in SSI

  36. Medicare Transfer DRGs • Medicare reduces the DRG payment if the Hospital transfers a patient to a post acute care setting “too early” • Compares the patient length of stay to the geometric mean length of stay for the DRG • Key factors in this penalty • The actual length of stay is less than the average • The patient actually goes to the post acute care provider • Does not apply to CAH and SCH paid on hospital specific rate

  37. Medicare DRG Transfer • How to identify how big of an impact this is to your organization • Obtain a PSR (Provider Statistical and Reimbursement System) report from your Medicare Administrative Contractor • Inpatient Part A (Report Type 110) • Compare the DRG Weight to the DRG Weight Fraction to identify the reduction in Case Mix • To identify the reduction in payments, divide the Gross Reimbursement by the DRG Weight Fraction and multiply by DRG Weight and compare to Gross Reimbursement

  38. Medicare DRG Transfer Opportunities • Review all patients with reduced DRGs under the transfer rule and make sure the patient actually went to the post acute provider • Requires matching up of the Hospital’s records and the CMS Public Use File • Limited time frame based on changes in ACA that limit filing to one calendar year after date of service

  39. Readmission Reduction Program • Reduced reimbursement on Medicare claims if readmission rates are “excessive” • Started October 1, 2012 and will continue to expand in FFY 2014 • Reduced reimbursement is based on your readmission rate compared to the national average for AMI, Heart Failure and Pneumonia • Recent CMS study indicates that Readmission Rates showed meaningful decline in 2012 • From 2007 to 2011 the average readmit rate was 19% • In 2012, the average readmit rate dropped to 18.4% • In other words, if you are not improving, then you are losing ground

  40. Readmission Reduction Program Opportunities • Ensure your system captures the following information • Specific location of where the patient was discharged (not just nursing home or home health) • Who the discharging physician was and when the discharge occurred

  41. Readmission Reduction Program Opportunities • Analyze the data on patients that are readmitted within 30 days for the following trends • Specific provider patient discharged to • Day of the week patient discharged • Time of the day patient discharged • Analyze the data by condition and by physician • Follow up with any “repeat” offenders – both internal ones and external providers

  42. Other Reimbursement Opportunities • Medicare Wage Index (not for CAHs) • Ensure you are capturing all the appropriate information and pay close attention to this data • It is probably the most important information on your Medicare cost report under the current system • Encourage all hospitals in your CBSA to do the same • Medicare Bad Debts • Continuing reduction in reimbursement % • Compare your Medicare bad debts claimed on your cost report to the Medicare deductibles and coinsurance on your PSR report

  43. Other Reimbursement Opportunities • 340B Drug Pricing Program • Receive OP drugs at significantly reduced prices • Have to qualify for participation • All CAHs and FQHCs • DSH Hospitals • SCH and RRC with DSH % of 8% • Retail pharmacy option • Compliance audits beginning

  44. Other Reimbursement Opportunities • Uncompensated Care • For NFP, important measure in the IRS Form 990 and maintenance of tax exempt status • Utilized in Medicare EHR Incentive Payment Program • Potentially utilized in DSH in 2014 and beyond

  45. Keys to Sustaining a Financially Vibrant Healthcare Organization • Strong financial performance due to robust demand for services and careful cost management • Focus on evidence-based clinical practice built on information resources that are shared across providers within the organization • Operational excellence that emphasizes efficiency and transparency to all stakeholders • Unrelenting focus on delivering outstanding value to people who rely upon the organization to provide a range of health care related services

  46. Industry View for 2014 and Beyond • Many substance and implementation issues surrounding reform • Substance issues: • Uncertainties around the growth or decline of private health insurance • Who will populate the insurance exchanges? • Will the surge of people with insurance in 2014 “flood” providers and boost labor markets? Will this be a temporary issue? • Longer-term, will inpatient volume plummet due to more effective prevention measures and the advent of evidence-based medicine? • Impact of local payor mixes will continue to influence view of reform – either positive or negative • Implementation issues: • Political opposition to the legislation • Which states will participate in Medicaid expansion • Specifics of rules and regulations yet to be published; and • Uncertainty about how health care exchanges will function • We believe implications of initial implementation of individual mandate likely to take a year or two to settle in; longer-term impact from reform may not be apparent until 2016 or 2017 • We believe that many hospitals and health systems will manage under reform effectively, but even the strongest hospitals are, at best, only likely to hold existing margin and liquidity levels, while weaker providers will likely see ongoing margin and balance sheet pressure leading to rating deterioration

More Related