1 / 32

Evaluation of Shrimp By-products for Pigs in Central Vietnam

Evaluation of Shrimp By-products for Pigs in Central Vietnam. Dr. Le Duc Ngoan Dept. of Animal Sciences, Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry. RESEARCH SITE. Hue City Central region. INTRODUCTION.

reegan
Download Presentation

Evaluation of Shrimp By-products for Pigs in Central Vietnam

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation of Shrimp By-products for Pigs in Central Vietnam Dr. Le Duc Ngoan Dept. of Animal Sciences, Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry

  2. RESEARCH SITE Hue City Central region

  3. INTRODUCTION • In Vietnam pig production plays an important role (population 19.3 mill. animals, 1999) • Majority of slaughtered pigs produced on small-scale farms • Cheap local materials used as energy sources • Protein supplement bought relatively expensive • To develop cheap and locally available protein-rich feed sources • Shrimp by-product may be an alternative

  4. SHRIMP PRODUCTION IN VIETNAM • Shrimp - the best food from fishery & expensive • The World market & consumption increases • Vietnam is the 5th largest shrimp producers • Dramatically increasing during ‘90-99 about 14% annual (83,000 in 1990 & 211,8000 ton in 1999) • Farming & natural catching many species • Mainly processing for export => By-products

  5. Shrimp by-products

  6. Shrimp By-products Produced & Sold by Hue Seafood Processing Factory • In 1995, 237 tons SBP produced, and • 125 tons utilized as feed by mainly sun-drying • 48% used in rainy season (Oct- Mar) • Dry or ?

  7. OBJECTIVES • To assess the flesh and by-product yields of the most abundant shrimp species, and chemical composition and amino acid profile of shrimp by-products (SBP); • To identify the most appropriate ensiling techniques for preserving SBP; • To provide information on total tract and ileal digestibility of nutrients & ileal digestibility of individual amino acids; • To evaluate the effects of replacing fishmeal by SBP on the performance and carcass traits of pigs.

  8. Investigation on Anatomical Proportions and Chemical and Amino Acid Composition

  9. Anatomical proportions & chemical composition: Species Penaeus monodon Giant Tiger prawn Metapenaeus affinis Pink (Jinga) shrimp Penaeus semisulcatus Green Tiger prawn • Grow in both saline and brackish waters, and harvested at different times of year • Buy from local market in different months

  10. Anatomical Proportions & Chemical Composition: Measurements • Length & body weight: washed and dried on soft paper prior to weighing, and the head and shell with tail removed to weigh different body proportions • Chemical composition and amino acid profile of shrimp by-products • Effect of heat treatment on proximate composition and amino acid profile

  11. Mean Body Weight and Flesh & By-product Yield • Average flesh & by-product yield 56.7 & 43.3% • Peneaus species generated lower by-product yield

  12. Chemical Composition of Shrimp By-products (%)

  13. Some Essential Amino Acid Contents Compared to Fishmeal(1)

  14. Dumped into hot water of 800C for 5 min. following the procedure of the factory Not affected by heat treatment Effect of Heat Treatment on Chemical (%) & Amino Acid Composition (g 16 g-1 N)

  15. Experiment on Ensiling Technique

  16. Ensiling process

  17. Experimental Design • Two additives at different proportions: Molasses and CRM • Ratios of SBP to Molasses 6:1, 4:1 & 3:1 (wet weight) • SBP to CRM: 3:1, 2:1 & 1:1 (wet weight of SBP, dry weight of CRM) • Measurements of DM, CP, NH3-N and pH at 0, 7, 14, 21 & 56 days, in triplicate

  18. Sample preparation

  19. Effect of SBP to Molasses Ratio on pH, CP and NH3-N • Silage with a ratio 6:1 & 4:1 spoiled after 14 days • Values on the chart for the silage with ratio 3:1

  20. Effect of Shrimp By-product to Cassava Root Meal Ratio on pH, CP and NH3-N • Silage with a ratio 3:1 & 2:1 spoiled after 14 days • Values on the chart for the silage with a ratio of 1:1

  21. Digestibility Trials

  22. Total Tract Digestibility: Design • Two digestibility trials carried out: on intact pigs & cannulated pigs to evaluate digestibility of OM & CP • First trial: 6 intact pigs arranged 3 dietary treatments: • FM diet: CRM, rice bran & FM, • SEM diet: CRM, rice bran & SBP ensiled with molasses • SEC diet: CRM, rice bran & SBP ensiled with CRM • Second trial: 4 pigs fitted PVTC fed 4 diets • Basal diet: CRM & rice bran • FM diet: basal diet & fishmeal • FSB diet: basal diet & fresh SBP • ESB diet: basal diet & SBP ensiled with molasses

  23. Total Tract Digestibility: Results • On intact pigs: Digestibility of OM & CP and N-retention significantly higher for the FM diet than SEM & SEC diets • On cannulated pigs: Digestibility of OM & CP significantly lower for ESB diet than for FM & FSB diets

  24. Ileal Digestibility of Amino Acids • 4 PVTC-cannulated pigs fed 4 diets: • Basal diet: rice bran & CRM • FM diet: basal diet & fishmeal • FSB diet: basal diet & fresh SBP • ESB diet: basal diet & SBP ensiled with molasses • Higher ileal digestibility of most AA in FM, FSB & ESB than the basal diet • No difference in the digestibility of individual AA between FM, FSB & ESB, except for Thr, Ala & Gly

  25. Cannulating pigs

  26.  Growth Performance Trial

  27. Growth Performance Trial: Design • 36 pigs in 3 treatments, 3 replicates, 4 pigs/replicate • Animals fed one of three diets, including • control diet (FM diet) and • 2 test diets based on the control diet with replacement of 50 (FM-ESB diet) or • 100% (ESB diet) of FM protein by SBP ensiled with molasses • Measurements: daily gain, FCR, some carcass characteristics

  28. Feeding pigs with ESM

  29. Growth Performance Trial: Results

  30. CONCLUSIONS • Protein-rich feed source, potentially useful. Low Methionine content limits its use. High chitin content  limiting factor for nutrient utilisation. High content of Ca limits the level of inclusion. • Shrimp by-product successfully preserved by ensiling with molasses at a ratio of 3:1 or with cassava root meal at a ratio of 1:1. • Fresh shrimp by-product could replace some of thefishmeal protein in diets for pigs. • High levels (above 7% DM) of inclusion of ensiled shrimp by-product in pig diets reduced body weight gain and feed intake.

  31. Further Studies on Shrimp By-products Have been done (‘01-02): • Using SBP for laying hens (Luong Phuong & Tam Hoang breeds) • Using SBP for broilers Propose to continue: • Introducing to farmers (Training materials, courses..)

  32. Thank you very much Tack så mycket Xin caïm ån

More Related