120 likes | 212 Views
Content of the p resentation. Progress and Crisis (2004-2006 and 2007-2013) Closure & Reporting (2004-2006) Systems and Simplification (2007-2013 and post 2013) Monitoring & Evaluation (2007-2013) Lessons learned and Future (post 2014) Any Other Business and Conclusions. 1.
E N D
Content of the presentation • Progress and Crisis (2004-2006 and 2007-2013) • Closure & Reporting (2004-2006) • Systems and Simplification (2007-2013 and post 2013) • Monitoring & Evaluation (2007-2013) • Lessons learned and Future (post 2014) • Any Other Business and Conclusions 1
2. Closure and Reporting (2004-2006) 2.1. Closure 2
Flexibility rule used as described in the EC closure guidelines 3
Funds overcommitted • 6 MS (CY, HU, LT, LV, PL, SI) have overcommitted up to 10 % • CY, LV, SI have overcommittedmore than 10% in ERAF • HU has overcommittedmore than 10% in ESF • LV has overcommitted more than 10% in FIFG 4
Specific national guidelines for closure – in 8 MS (II) • Final controls by the IBs (CY) • Financial guidelines (SK) • Monitoring (PL, SK) • Verification reports and statements (CY,SI)
Specific problems with closure of the 2004-2006 programming period • 5 MS (EE, MT, LT, PL, SI) have specific problems related to the closure of programmes 7
2. Closure and Reporting (2004-2006) 2.2. Arrangements for post-implementation monitoring 8
Guidelines for post-implementation 3 MS (HU, LV, SI) have guidelines for post implementation 9
Mechanisms to ensure that considerable modifications do notoccur within the 5 yearperiod 10
2. Closure and Reporting (2004-2006) 2.3. Cohesion Fund 11
Financial corrections and hearing procedures in CF, closures of CF projects • 2 MS – HU and LV – have Cohesion Fund projects to be continued after 31.12.2010 • EC has proposed financial coorections in 6 MS (CZ, EE, HU, LT, LV, SK) • 3 MS (LT, PL, SK)had hearing procedures regarding financial corrections 12