1 / 29

Using research and evidence to improve student retention and success Professor Liz Thomas

Overview. Introducing EvidenceNet and the Widening Participation Research Service (WPRS)What the student retention and success synthesis tells usDefinitions and understandings of retention and successWhich students leave higher education earlyReasons for non-completionApproaches to improving st

regis
Download Presentation

Using research and evidence to improve student retention and success Professor Liz Thomas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Using research and evidence to improve student retention and success Professor Liz Thomas

    2. Overview Introducing EvidenceNet and the Widening Participation Research Service (WPRS) What the student retention and success synthesis tells us Definitions and understandings of retention and success Which students leave higher education early Reasons for non-completion Approaches to improving student retention and success Introduction to the Theory of Change model of improving retention and success Applying this model to participants own area of work

    3. Introducing EvidenceNet and the Widening Participation Research Service

    4. EvidenceNet EvidenceNet is a service to promote and explore the use of practice- and research-based evidence in teaching and learning in Higher Education. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ourwork/research/evidencenet

    5. Widening Participation Research Service (WPRS) The WPRS aims to support all staff in Higher Education with a widening Participation remit. It provides access to research information, services and resources thereby supporting the embedding of diversity and widening participation throughout the student lifecycle.

    6. The Organisation Directory details national and international organisations related to widening participation. The Literature Database includes recent journal articles and reports concerning widening participation. The Practice Directory provides details of specific projects in the field of WP.

    7. Current topics: New to WP? Retention and student success Vocational learners Mature learners

    8. Planned topics: Inclusive learning and teaching Improving the success of black and minority ethnic students US research on student retention and persistence Models of student support Disabled students Impact of class, gender and ethnicity on access and success Flexible learning and widening participation

    9. The WPRS will form a key strand of the Higher Education Academy’s EvidenceNet; this will ensure its on-going sustainability. EvidenceNet is in at the end of the first phase of development. Phase 1 will be launched at the Academy's Annual Conference in June 2009. This will include: a searchable repository of resources, events and networks from the Academy and beyond. a star rating feature to enable users to rate resources.

    10. What do we already know?

    11. Widening Participation Research Service (WPRS) Student retention and success synthesis (Jones 2008) http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ourwork/institutions/wp/wprs

    12. Limitations: emphasis on academic achievement, rather than more subjective views of success. Ignores students who leave before 1st December Limitations: emphasis on academic achievement, rather than more subjective views of success. Ignores students who leave before 1st December

    13. Who leaves HE? What is the relationship between WP and retention?

    14. Government reports National Audit Office (NAO): retention has not improved between 2002 and 2007 Public Accounts Committee (PAC): concerned this is due to WP and thus greater diversity might worsen retention rates

    15. MPs’ interpretation (PAC report) Increasing and widening participation in higher education attracts more students from under-represented groups who are more likely to withdraw from courses early. These students may need more support to complete their courses. Universities need to understand the needs of their changing student populations. PAC recommendation 2

    16. Expert opinion (PAC report) The Department recognises the tension between widening participation and non-completion, and the Government’s previous target required progress on both retention and participation. In recent years, retention has held up while participation has increased and the Funding Council sees no reason to think that the retention rates will fall as further progress is made towards 50% participation. (PAC, paragraph 6). Ruth Thompson, Director-General, Higher Education, Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills Professor David Eastwood, Chief Executive, Higher Education Funding Council for EnglandRuth Thompson, Director-General, Higher Education, Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills Professor David Eastwood, Chief Executive, Higher Education Funding Council for England

    17. Research evidence (NAO report) NAO (2002 and 2007) and other studies suggest it is not the background of the students which is most influential, but rather entry qualifications. Entry qualifications also account for much of the institutional differences that can be observed across the sector, hence the NAO (2007) finding that most institutions meet or exceed their benchmarks. Correlation between occupational class and probability of early withdrawal (Smith and Naylor 2001). But, this is not necessarily causal and is likely to be linked to entry qualifications. Much of the expansion has actually been via dumb rich kids, rather than dumb poor kids. There is a real challenge to identify those with potential rather than those who, with all the benefits of a good education and supportive family environment have still failed to achieve suitable A level grades.Much of the expansion has actually been via dumb rich kids, rather than dumb poor kids. There is a real challenge to identify those with potential rather than those who, with all the benefits of a good education and supportive family environment have still failed to achieve suitable A level grades.

    18. Institutional research evidence Institutional research at Roehampton University (Curtis 2007) analysed the planning data for the 2005/06 academic year. The following factors were correlated with non-continuation (statistically significant p. < 0.01): Type of qualifications (those with non-A-levels qualifications were more likely to leave); Level of tariff points (those with lower tariff points were more likely to leave); Gender (males were more likely to leave); Entry (those coming through clearing were more likely to leave). Thus there are challenges to improve retention, but much of this is about institutional decisions, processes etc rather than due to students from lower socio-economic groups Thus there are challenges to improve retention, but much of this is about institutional decisions, processes etc rather than due to students from lower socio-economic groups

    19. Why do students leave higher education?

    20. Why students leave There is rarely a single reason why students leave. Contributing factors are: Preparation for higher education Institutional and course match Academic experience Social integration Financial issues Personal circumstances  

    21. How can we improve student retention and success?

    22. Factors improving retention Pre-entry information, preparation and admission Induction and transition support Curriculum development Social engagement Student support Data and monitoring Institutional commitment to retention and management of the process

    23. Theory of Change Locates work in the literature and existing good practice Identifies 3 inter-connected layers Pre-conditions for improving student retention and success Influential factors Examples of effective practice Summarised visually

    24. Activity Select a host for the table For the theme you have been allocated, identify influential factors contributing to achieving this pre-condition. Identify examples of effective practices you know of or are currently using in your institution. When asked to move, the host should remain with the table. On new table, host will summarise existing thinking. Add further influential factors and examples of effective practice.

    25. Retention Grants Programme

    26. Retention Grants Programme NAO (2007) and PAC (2008): Lack of progress and lack of evidence about what works. Ł1 million (Paul Hamlyn Foundation and HEFCE) to support projects that identify, evaluate and disseminate good practice.  The primary purpose of the programme is to generate robust, evidence-based analysis and evaluation about the most effective strategies to ensure high continuation and completion rates.  

    27. What are we doing? Seven projects have been funded and a support and co-ordination team which aims to: To support individual projects to enhance development, evaluation and collaborative dissemination; To co-ordinate inter-project working to further the learning and dissemination across the 7 funded projects; To undertake meta evaluation and analysis of effective strategies to support retention; To promote dissemination and learning across the HE sector. Briefing No. 1 provides details of the 7 projects.Briefing No. 1 provides details of the 7 projects.

    28. Dissemination Opportunities Student retention and success community of interest Biannual briefings throughout the programme Two day retention convention, Leeds, 3rd and 4th March 2010 Ongoing National Research Seminar Series Final dissemination conference 2012 Publications.

    29. More information: Student retention and success JISC list email info@actiononaccess.org Retention Grants Programme visit the website at http://www.phf.org.uk/landing.asp?id=367 or email lthomas@phf.org.uk Widening Participation Research Service: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ourwork/institutions/wp/wprs or email inclusion@heacademy.ac.uk Email liz.thomas@heacademy.ac.uk or l.thomas@actiononaccess.org

    30. References Curtis, A. (2007) Student Retention Guide for Academic Staff. London: Roehampton University Jones, R (2008) Student retention and success. Research Synthesis. York: Higher Education Academy National Audit Office (NAO) (2007) Staying the course: the retention of students in higher education. London: The Stationary Office House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts Committee (2008) Staying the course: the retention of students on higher education courses. Tenth report of session 2007-8. London: The Stationery Office Ltd Smith, J. and Naylor, R.A. (2001) ‘Dropping out of university: a statistical analysis of the probability of withdrawal for UK university students’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 164, No. 2, pp. 389–405

More Related