E N D
1. Middlesbrough Primary Care Trust Prevention –
Children protected and well looked after
2. Who we are – Peter Kelly, Director of Health Improvement and Public Health
Louise Wallace, Head of Planning (Health Improvement)
3. Key Drivers NHS Plan – Health Inequalities Children
Planning and Priorities Guidance –
• Improvement, Expansion and Reform 2003/ 2006
South Tees Child Protection Guidelines
Laming Report – Victoria Climbiè
Children Looked After – National Guidance 2003
Emerging Children’s National Service Framework
Supporting Families (DoH) 1998 Sure Start
Children’s Act
4. Services for Children and Families provided by Middlesbrough PCT Health Visiting (approximately 60 staff)
School Nursing (approximately 30 staff)
Physiotherapy
Speech and Language Therapy
Contraception and Reproductive Health
Child Protection Named Nurses
5. Redesigning Services Main motivation –
‘To provide an excellent service to all patients’
Duty of PCT to improve health of local people and reduce health inequalities
Belief that redesigning services will strengthen opportunities to support families in their own communities preventing crisis
6. Public Health Nursing Health Visitors and School Nurses should be:
‘Preventing ill health and promoting health for individuals, families and communities.) (Botes 1998)
Evidence to support this (Acheson Public Health Report 1998):
– Inequality in health is related to poverty
– recognition of the social factory influencing
health
– work with families to enable them to improve the
future generation’s health
7. Current Model Health Visitors practice-focused
School Nurses link to cluster of schools
West Middlesbrough Neighbourhood Trust’s School Nursing team
Six Sure Starts
Acute operational issues
8. Inequality in Current Service Provision Health Visitors workload –
• Historical allocation
• Provision bears some relationship to
volume – but does not relate well to
need
9. Examples Number of patients per Health Visitor varies from:
2600 : 1 – 6900 : 1
Number of ‘needy’ children per Health Visitor ranges from:
8 : 1 – 44 : 1
10. Examples Number of families with cause for concern ranges from:
3 : 1 – 100 : 1
Inequalities
Post natal depression
Immunisations
11. The Local Service 27% of the Health Visiting and School Nursing workforce retire within five years
Have a multi-skilled workforce (21 different recognised qualifications/ skills)
Acute problems in some practices
12. GP practices in Middlesbrough are not equally spread
Families registered with GPs are scattered across the town
The Health Visitor can visit every area in one week
Targeting resources is very difficult
13. Options Re-distribute existing workforce
Level up the workforce
Do nothing
Change model of service delivery
14. The Re-distribute Option
Move Health Visitor from five or six practices with ‘best provision’ to those five or six with poorest provision
15. The ‘level-up’ Option
7 extra HVs takes everybody up to median (224K)
18 extra takes everybody to upper quartile level (576K)
61 extra takes everybody to best level (1952K)
16. Do Nothing Option Inequality in provision will continue
System remain inflexible, continue to be difficult to cover maternity leave, sickness and vacancies
Risk to patients
Risk to health visitors
17. The Proposed Public Health Model in Middlesbrough Health Visitors will move from GP bases
Locality bases will be set up
Shared/ Community caseloads will be implemented with full team involvement
All families will have a named Health Visitor
Equity within caseloads will be a priority
18. Issues that can be addressed in the Locality Teams Equity
Communication
Immunisations
Flexibility
Understanding and responding to need
Partnership working with other agencies
19. What are the benefits of new Model? Staff will complete a Health Needs Assessment of a community, identifying issues for those in areas with high Child Protection rates
Staff will be working on the ground more closely with other agencies such as Social Services and Sure Start
Staff will be easily accessible, drop in services etc.
Prevent crisis before it occurs
Understanding and responding to need
Partnership working with other agencies
20. Other PCT Services to compliment the Model Child Protection aims to protect children, but also tries to keep families together. This is a Key Issue in the Children’s Act
Child Protection nurses offer advice, supervision and support to colleagues within MPCT
Offer advice to ensure appropriate use of multi-agency services
21. Strategically, Peter Kelly is named Director within MPCT for Children’s Services and Child Protection
Led for MPCT on South Tees Area Child Protection Committee
Chair of Internal PCT Child Protection Committee involving managers and clinicians. Key area of work for this group is to implement Laming Report recommendations
22. Middlesbrough Primary Care Trust aims to provide an adequate, accessible and timely therapeutic service for Child Protection to ensure the long term emotional well being, mental health and welfare of children
23. Other Services Chris Nugent (HV) appointed as PCT Co-ordinator for Children Looked After
Based with the Leaving Care Team in One Stop shops, to be accessible to young people
Health Assessments offered by PCT
0 – 5 years every six months
5 – 19 years every year
24. Conclusion Prevention is better than cure
Targeting service at need
Working closely together in a multi-agency, multi-disciplinary way
Good communication
Open, accessible staff
Excellent processes and procedures to ensure
Children are protected and Well Looked After